myk
patron mod of ugly ducklings and black sheep
Posts: 10458
Registered: 04-02 |
Kyka said:
The evidence seems to me to be just as scientific and just as hard for intelligent design. The key difference is simply that it is far less widely accepted.
Intelligent design is not science; it's a political mix-up of religion and science.
Its a pity that you gotta use religion as your straw man that you use to knock down to make your point.
By saying I am making a straw man you're assuming you understand religion better than I do and that my argument is misconstruing it. This isn't directly supported in any way by your argument, which makes the call on straw-manning rather presumptuous or inadequate.
Dogma (belief) is religion's main asset, so I don't see how I'm misconstruing anything. I'm saying that science becomes dogmatic if reduced to the objective, and that science is not religion, because to science dogma is largely a development problem, while to religion dogma becomes a problem only when it clashes with societal change or difference, for the most part, and is otherwise essential.
GreyGhost said:
Which one do you think would make the better DooM player - McCain or Obama?
Heh, McCain might actually make a better player... but also a better monster in the game (at least he's ugly enough).
|
07-11-08 09:12 
