---

Tormentor667 said:

and if I just got told that my map sucks because "it has not much height variances (it's a flat space station!), not enough open areas and too many reflective floors (it doesn't feature that many GZDoom features at all!)!

---

---

Homer said:
But it's best to accept that not everyone is going to love your wad, but to accept their critisism and take it onboard for your next map.

---

---

gargoylol said:
that's because he's not brainwashed with propoganda.

---

---

Tormentor667 said:

Im always fine with criticism but what I do not like is criticism like "This Map Sucks" and as I stated many times before: Deathz0rs review on Sapphire ended up like this, because the map is from me. No one else that stated on Sapphire was that harsh, and most of them had something good to say about the map (next to the things which were bad)...

---

---

Homer said:
this is just one person who dis-liked it, look at how many have enjoyed the map.

---

---

Fredrik said:
I smell attention envy.

---

---

Graf Zahl said:
I think these times are long gone. And deathz0r's reviews are the major reason for it.

I can't respect someone who insults others' hard work but himself is happy making intentional crap, euphemistically called joke WADs.

---

---

Tormentor667 said:

This isn't what I've said. While I was developing the map, I showed off many screenshots and I involved the feedback I got from several persons.
I even made this map not that hard at all and the ammo/monster balance is very good this time (this is at least what I and my beta testers thought), and if I just got told that my map sucks because "it has not much height variances (it's a flat space station!), not enough open areas and too many reflective floors (it doesn't feature that many GZDoom features at all!), then I feel unfair threatened... :( I mean, it was obvious that I get something like this from deathz0r if he reads "Tormentor667" as the author of the map...he said nothing good about the map...so is it really that bad?!

---

---

@HobbsTiger1 - My betatesters consisted of Enjay, TheDarkArchon, GrafZahl and BioHazard, all persons which heavily focus on gameplay (just play "Thief - Trail of the Arch-Heretic") and all of them told me, that gameplay is well adjusted and fine, so I actually DID focus on that!

---

---

WildWeasel said:
I didn't think the gameplay on Sapphire was that bad compared to, say, TNT:LE. At least it's possible to complete it.

---

---

GrafLolz said:
I can't respect someone who insults others' hard work but himself is happy making intentional crap, euphemistically called joke WADs.

---

---

HobbsTiger1 said:

BTW if I had to sum of Sapphire in one word it would be 'sucks'

Carry on

---

---

Graf Zahl said:
You would. And that's why your opinion is worth shit. Sorry!

---

---

Graf Zahl said:
I reserve intelligence for people who deserve it.

---

---

Graf Zahl said:
I reserve intelligence for people who deserve it.

---

---

Tormentor667 said:
That's very true Homer, but Doomworld is something like a Showcase for new wads, you know...

---

---

HobbsTiger1 said:
For the love of all thing sacred, deal with the fact that you didnt get a good review. If you believe its good thats all that should matter. If you feel a need to be loved (or have something loved) by everyone find a fucking support group. Alternatively go back to the ztheatre, its close enough.

---

---

Job said:
but it could at least be acknowledged that the wad does look good.

---

---

Move on with your lives already. It's petty retardcapades like this that compell more mature, who're generally more productive, members to leave the community.

---