myk
The Disciple of Lüt

Posts: 10005
Registered: 04-02 |
Bloodshedder said:
Originally, deathz0r said ZDoom 1.22, and after I called him a retard, he said change it to 1.23b33. I think the latest version, or even 63a, would be a better choice.
I'd say the latest version not branded as "beta" (2.1.6 seems to apply) for new wads, but if it's clear the wad was made a while back and then uploaded an older version might apply. Still, it's up to the ZDoom wad author to specify with what versions it was tested under, otherwise it may turn out buggy with any other versions. The reviewer won't be trying the wad in a dozen versions, in any case.
Quasar said:
Maybe the wads should be fixed and reuploaded, then they could be reviewed for real. As a source port author, I am also very tired of the false compatibility statements.
Agreed, but in the author's defense, they say "Tested with: ZDoom/GZDoom", so I don't think these wads should have been nonreviewed because of this. Their gross bug (incompatibility with the aimed engine model) should be clearly noted, maybe in bold type or capital letters, but unless it doesn't say what they were tested with, they should not be dumped without a review. Had the TXTs not said "reviewed with" I would have agreed with a nonreview, but these uploads are NOT that case.
|