myk
patron mod of ugly ducklings and black sheep

Posts: 10237
Registered: 04-02 |
Darkfyre said:
I not allowed to defend something I put time in to?
You aren't defending anything, heh.
I have just as much right to defend it as you do to bad mouth it.
The idea of reviews and review discussions is of a place where users pour their impressions about wads and addons they play as frankly and clearly as possible, interacting with other users, so that users, and why not the authors, may have a view of what people think about the wads. In cases where there is any criticism (as opposed to when everyone loves an addon), authors getting involved in the discussion of the criticism practically always help drive the threads into a mired argument, because they are 100% biased towards thier own creations. They have around 0% "objectivity" in regard to them, because they are their creators. Do you question positive feedback 10% as much as the negative one? What makes the positive stuff even reasonable? Why not tell the guys that give good but perhaps flimsy feedback stuff like "hey asskisser, I don't give a fuck what you think, I made the wad for myself and if you like it, good for you, what do I care? What you say you saw in the wad that's so good is not there, and you're probably crazy, I made it like this and it means that, instead".
Authors getting involved in the discussions tend to derail and muddle proper input, that isn't aimed necessarily to the author; for the most part it is for other users, the author stands beyond that. He can take the input or leave it, and doesn't have to worry about it because he's not there to try his own wad, nor is he selling the thing.
Because of all this, if you really want to (or need to) "explain" your wad in any way (it might make sense to a small degree though most keen artists let their work speak for itself) I'd suggest a more appropriate place, such as your blog, or a page dedicated to the wad itself.
|