Do0minat0r
Loser

Posts: 161
Registered: 06-09 |
Craigs said:
Not sure if that 8 means much though. From what I've seen so far, he gives all of the wads he reviews fairly high scores. Perhaps I missed one, but a brief glance at the list of reviews showed that the lowest score any of them got was a 6.
Look at the wads he's reviewed. I don't think I'd give any of them lower scores either, or if I would, it's just by matter of opinion. I can't find any downright bad wad in his entire list.
In fact, the one he gave a 6, Genesis of Descent, I'd rate considerably higher. It even won a Cacoward back (I think) in '07! Meanwhile, I can actually find a considerable number of wads he's reviewed that I'd consider worse that Genesis. But as I said, that's all a matter of opinion, and I think every level on his list is at least OK.
EDIT: In fact, I took a count and over 25 of his 92 wads reviewed have received Cacoward recognition (or top 10 in years '03 and prior). Another 2-4 or so (not exactly sure) received honorable mentions.
So the whole message here is I think he doesn't bother with bad levels (at least in terms of reviewing them).
Last edited by Do0minat0r on 08-15-09 at 10:37
|