Mancubus
Register | User Profile | Member List | F.A.Q | Privacy Policy | New Blog | Search Forums | Forums Home
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Doomworld News > Plutonia 2 reviewed
Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Author
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:10. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Do0minat0r
Loser


Posts: 161
Registered: 06-09


Ismaele has posted a detailed review of Plutonia 2 at his Outpost of Doom website. He gave it 8/10, saying that it is a fun wad that keeps the atmosphere/gameplay of the original Plutonia. A few flaws and bugs that he says should have been caught during playtesting helped lead him to take two points off the final score.

Last edited by Do0minat0r on 08-14-09 at 12:48

Old Post 08-14-09 12:39 #
Do0minat0r is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Craigs
The only idiot here besides Csonicgo


Posts: 2428
Registered: 11-05


Not sure if that 8 means much though. From what I've seen so far, he gives all of the wads he reviews fairly high scores. Perhaps I missed one, but a brief glance at the list of reviews showed that the lowest score any of them got was a 6.

Old Post 08-15-09 08:22 #
Craigs is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Do0minat0r
Loser


Posts: 161
Registered: 06-09



Craigs said:
Not sure if that 8 means much though. From what I've seen so far, he gives all of the wads he reviews fairly high scores. Perhaps I missed one, but a brief glance at the list of reviews showed that the lowest score any of them got was a 6.


Look at the wads he's reviewed. I don't think I'd give any of them lower scores either, or if I would, it's just by matter of opinion. I can't find any downright bad wad in his entire list.

In fact, the one he gave a 6, Genesis of Descent, I'd rate considerably higher. It even won a Cacoward back (I think) in '07! Meanwhile, I can actually find a considerable number of wads he's reviewed that I'd consider worse that Genesis. But as I said, that's all a matter of opinion, and I think every level on his list is at least OK.

EDIT: In fact, I took a count and over 25 of his 92 wads reviewed have received Cacoward recognition (or top 10 in years '03 and prior). Another 2-4 or so (not exactly sure) received honorable mentions.

So the whole message here is I think he doesn't bother with bad levels (at least in terms of reviewing them).

Last edited by Do0minat0r on 08-15-09 at 10:37

Old Post 08-15-09 10:04 #
Do0minat0r is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Jimmy91
rhymes with Midi91


Posts: 1106
Registered: 04-06


A nice honest review, I think. :)

Old Post 08-15-09 12:23 #
Jimmy91 is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
kaneda
Newbie


Posts: 4
Registered: 08-09


doesn't work with jDoom (1.9 beta6 or whatever I just downloaded yesterday...)


:(

Old Post 08-15-09 18:00 #
kaneda is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Gez
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 6458
Registered: 07-07



kaneda said:
doesn't work with jDoom (1.9 beta6 or whatever I just downloaded yesterday...)

Doomsday doesn't support about 99% of the Boom additions. The developers are busy rewriting large parts of the port's architecture, and they'll look at adding Boom support afterwards. In the meantime, you can try Risen3D, it's based on an older version of jDoom but it does support Boom.

Old Post 08-15-09 19:11 #
Gez is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
esselfortium
Cumulonimbus Antagonistic Posting


Posts: 5152
Registered: 01-02



Gez said:

Doomsday doesn't support about 99% of the Boom additions. The developers are busy rewriting large parts of the port's architecture, and they'll look at adding Boom support afterwards. In the meantime, you can try Risen3D, it's based on an older version of jDoom but it does support Boom.



Plutonia 2 is a vanilla wad, though.

__________________
Released: Seventeen More Times (album) - Listen free online! | Vaporware Demo | SpaceDM9 | A Terrible Flood (album) | SpaceDM5 | Greenwar 2 | 32in24 series | Claust1024 | Testing Facility
In Progress: Vaporware | KDiKDiZD | TSoZD | ???
Resources: EDF Monster Library | Mapping Tips | CC4-tex | EsselTX

Old Post 08-15-09 19:16 #
esselfortium is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Creaphis
I will deliberately take a contrary position just for the sake of writing incredibly long arguments


Posts: 3953
Registered: 10-05


He gave a 10 to "Final Heretic - Chapter One: The Docks". This, under his rating system, indicates that "you can't do better". Alright, I accept that a rating is an opinion, but a reader still assumes that the holder of that opinion has some capacities of aesthetic judgment.

Old Post 08-16-09 00:15 #
Creaphis is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Zaldron
Sex Cauldron


Posts: 9916
Registered: 08-00



Creaphis said:
He gave a 10 to "Final Heretic - Chapter One: The Docks". This, under his rating system, indicates that "you can't do better". Alright, I accept that a rating is an opinion, but a reader still assumes that the holder of that opinion has some capacities of aesthetic judgment.

If 10 meant you can't do better no game would ever get a 10. It means the media, whatever the art form, will go down as a personal favorite of him for the years to come.

For example, I'd give a ten to Deus Ex while accepting all of its constituents could be improved 1000x.

Old Post 08-16-09 01:20 #
Zaldron is offline Profile || Blog || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Creaphis
I will deliberately take a contrary position just for the sake of writing incredibly long arguments


Posts: 3953
Registered: 10-05


But no matter what a 10 stands for, I wouldn't even give The Docks a 5.

Old Post 08-16-09 02:23 #
Creaphis is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
kaneda
Newbie


Posts: 4
Registered: 08-09



Gez said:

Doomsday doesn't support about 99% of the Boom additions. The developers are busy rewriting large parts of the port's architecture, and they'll look at adding Boom support afterwards. In the meantime, you can try Risen3D, it's based on an older version of jDoom but it does support Boom.



I will try that, thx!

Old Post 08-16-09 04:23 #
kaneda is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Do0minat0r
Loser


Posts: 161
Registered: 06-09



Creaphis said:
But no matter what a 10 stands for, I wouldn't even give The Docks a 5.


It's just his opinion, not anybody else's (and you certainly have the right to disagree with him), and I think for the most part, he is giving fair scores out in his reviews. I certainly don't see anything in his list that is just downright bad, and that alone makes the fact that he has given a minimum assesment of 6 believable. Of course others are bound to potentially find a few stuff in the list that they think is worth fewer points, but that's a matter of opinion. I certainly can't find that much in his list that I think is worth less, and I even can find some reviews he wrote that I think are underrated. It looks like he just doesn't bother spending time to review bad levels, which I find perfectly reasonable, since all you'd be doing is telling people why they should not play the level. So I don't see anything wrong with his reviews - after all, I'm sure I could find reviews I disagree with on any other review site as well.

Old Post 08-16-09 04:41 #
Do0minat0r is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
40oz
And who knows, maybe I'm wrong. But that's extremely unlikely because I'm always right.


Posts: 4850
Registered: 08-07


then how did this become news'd?

Old Post 08-16-09 04:51 #
40oz is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
kristus
Megablast!


Posts: 9570
Registered: 07-00



Creaphis said:
But no matter what a 10 stands for, I wouldn't even give The Docks a 5.

Indeed, definitely makes you question his judgement. :p

Old Post 08-16-09 05:06 #
kristus is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DuckReconMajor
Forum Spammer


Posts: 3555
Registered: 01-09



40oz said:
then how did this become news'd?
That's what I wondered. I just figured everyone would jump on me so I had my post deleted.

Old Post 08-16-09 06:43 #
DuckReconMajor is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
myk
webbed digits


Posts: 14316
Registered: 04-02


Thanks for the review, Ismaele.

By the "then," Johnny's sounds like a rhetorical question: "If, as you say, this is just another opinion, why is it newsed?"

And, yeah, it's better to just post about talk topics (on topic or deviating) than to "metapost" about what's published.

Old Post 08-16-09 07:13 #
myk is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
GreyGhost
a ghost... only grey


Posts: 5188
Registered: 01-08



DuckReconMajor said:
That's what I wondered. I just figured everyone would jump on me so I had my post deleted.
How dare you! Stating the bleeding obvious then wimping out! Coward! :P

I had my own reservations about the thread's newsworthiness but chose to keep them to myself. Then again - whoever news'd the item probably knew we'd spend the next few days arguing over the review, which almost makes it a surrogate T/nC.

Old Post 08-16-09 07:24 #
GreyGhost is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DuckReconMajor
Forum Spammer


Posts: 3555
Registered: 01-09



GreyGhost said:
How dare you! Stating the bleeding obvious then wimping out! Coward! :P
You people terrify me. I'm not taking that chance.

myk said:
By the "then," Johnny's sounds like a rhetorical question: "If, as you say, this is just another opinion, why is it newsed?"
Though I misinterpreted his intentions, I understood what he meant. I figured with Ismaele's review being newsworthy, he must be a respected reviewer. Then people came in and criticized his criticism and I was confused.

I kinda agree with GreyGhost. Do0minat0r probably got bored of watching speed demos and decided to start a flame war instead. Just look at him, snickering at us as he opens a Reese's cup and puts more butter on his popcorn.

Old Post 08-16-09 09:21 #
DuckReconMajor is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Chrispaks
Mini-Member


Posts: 82
Registered: 12-08


He grades too easily. I only see 9's and 10's domination when I scroll. I always make a '10' worth something. A 10 on my scale would be my only 10, and if I found anything better I would reduce the previous ten to a nine.

Old Post 08-16-09 16:14 #
Chrispaks is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
40oz
And who knows, maybe I'm wrong. But that's extremely unlikely because I'm always right.


Posts: 4850
Registered: 08-07



DuckReconMajor said:
Though I misinterpreted his intentions, I understood what he meant. I figured with Ismaele's review being newsworthy, he must be a respected reviewer. Then people came in and criticized his criticism and I was confused.


Same. I'm not familiar with Ismaele's reviews.

Old Post 08-16-09 16:49 #
40oz is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Scuba Steve


Posts: 3731
Registered: 11-02



Chrispaks said:
He grades too easily. I only see 9's and 10's domination when I scroll. I always make a '10' worth something. A 10 on my scale would be my only 10, and if I found anything better I would reduce the previous ten to a nine.


That's not really fair... there are varying degrees of a "10". I think only 3 wads have ever been given a "10" in the past 5 years when I rate things for the Cacowards (you never see these scores). A 10 I've given one project (I think it was a megawad) was a totally different 10 than the other project received (a couple map project). One was a 10 as far as classic Doom gameplay went, the other was a 10 because it was something entirely different... but still amazing.

Old Post 08-16-09 22:06 #
Scuba Steve is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
myk
webbed digits


Posts: 14316
Registered: 04-02



40oz said:
I'm not familiar with Ismaele's reviews.
Well, there they are for you to see. He's been newsed in the past, as well. I think many of them are pretty meh in their conclusions or focus (and the AV review I just read is just silly... though it seems to be an older review) but at least he generally puts effort into covering all sorts of aspects, thus being thought-provoking by getting relatively specific on what he's talking about, and deals with WADs that draw attention (which is relevant in regard to a news post.)

Old Post 08-17-09 05:04 #
myk is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Butts
Senior Member


Posts: 1470
Registered: 07-07


You see here, I rate things on how much I like it. I think that is the best system to use.

Personally, I thought the detail in plutonia 2 was consistent and appealing, I would have scored it higher (like a 9.5, I really fucking liked how it looked) and probably giving the overall rating a 9.5 or 10, because I really fucking liked it. There is no way to review something purely analytically and unbiased.

Old Post 08-17-09 08:51 #
Butts is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Naan
Junior Member


Posts: 246
Registered: 10-05


Why is "The Docks" so bad?

Old Post 08-18-09 01:03 #
Naan is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
kristus
Megablast!


Posts: 9570
Registered: 07-00


Because it's ugly and it got bad game play.

Old Post 08-18-09 01:27 #
kristus is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Chrispaks
Mini-Member


Posts: 82
Registered: 12-08



Scuba Steve said:


That's not really fair... there are varying degrees of a "10". I think only 3 wads have ever been given a "10" in the past 5 years when I rate things for the Cacowards (you never see these scores). A 10 I've given one project (I think it was a megawad) was a totally different 10 than the other project received (a couple map project). One was a 10 as far as classic Doom gameplay went, the other was a 10 because it was something entirely different... but still amazing.



But that means that you divide it into two categories, and thus you have only one single wad max out in each category-- which sort of follows what my post said by having one max, no?

Old Post 08-18-09 02:17 #
Chrispaks is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
waverider
Mini-Member


Posts: 82
Registered: 01-05


Speaking of Plutonia 2, was there ever an updated release of it? Or is it still version 1.0? And any word on whether or not it will be updated?

v1.0 is truly awesome already, but it would be really cool if maps such as 11 and 27 would be fixed so you can finish them with 100% kills & secrets.

Old Post 08-21-09 13:38 #
waverider is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
t.v.
Junior Member


Posts: 213
Registered: 10-06


There was going to be a fixed version, but there hasn't been any activity since... april? So it's possible it will never be finished...

Old Post 08-23-09 23:04 #
t.v. is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
esselfortium
Cumulonimbus Antagonistic Posting


Posts: 5152
Registered: 01-02


t.v.: That's too bad, but I can understand it. The 1.0 release still blows me away, though (both in terms of its quality and in terms of the gameplay literally blowing me away :P ), so if an update never happens you've still got a fantastic release out there.

__________________
Released: Seventeen More Times (album) - Listen free online! | Vaporware Demo | SpaceDM9 | A Terrible Flood (album) | SpaceDM5 | Greenwar 2 | 32in24 series | Claust1024 | Testing Facility
In Progress: Vaporware | KDiKDiZD | TSoZD | ???
Resources: EDF Monster Library | Mapping Tips | CC4-tex | EsselTX

Old Post 08-24-09 01:30 #
esselfortium is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Scuba Steve


Posts: 3731
Registered: 11-02



Chrispaks said:
But that means that you divide it into two categories, and thus you have only one single wad max out in each category-- which sort of follows what my post said by having one max, no?
Not really. It's really just a gut reaction when I play the project... I never compare one to another and say "Well... that one was better. I don't divide it along lines like, "Doom-like and non doom-like". I regard a 10 as "doing everything right" not "This is the best ever".

Old Post 08-24-09 13:52 #
Scuba Steve is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:10. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Doomworld News > Plutonia 2 reviewed

Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are OFF
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - Doomworld >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Forums Directory