magicsofa
Senior Member

Posts: 1379
Registered: 04-03 |
It was enjoyable. Complaining about unoriginal story is pretty ridiculous. Obviously the basic idea has been done before, there was at least a few original, if minor, ideas. On that note, the following would involve spoilers if they weren't glaringly obvious since the beginning of the film.
What I liked:
- The imagery. Not specifically the CGI, which was effective and not overdone. I'm talking about all visual components. The angles and shot composition were wonderful, and the jungle world was very cool and well constructed.
- The message. Sorry, I am a dirty hippie, and I love trees. I also love seeing the asshole general get his ass handed to him, but it would have been better if the corporate buttmunch was brutally killed because he was far more annoying. Also, it was cool that they chose a hoo-rah jarhead to turn to nature's side or whatever. Makes it accessible to those type :P
- The action as well as other 'physical' scenes (exploration, etc). Cavalry charge could have been better but it is quite satisfying when those hammerhead motherfuckers save the day.
What I didn't care for:
- The characters. Not very substantial.
- The happy-go-lucky falling in love, becoming a part of their tribe, and so on. I'm not saying it shouldn't have happened but it felt like "oh we have to put this in the movie so here it is!" rather than having any kind of twist involved.
- That goddamn corporate buttmunch. Other characters show how the humans didn't care about the na'vi and company, and saw them as savage, and it was fine. But this guy was basically just offensive (such as calling the creatures "the blue monkeys") and he didn't get a cruel, gut-wrenching death. His character could only be legitimate if he got torn limb from limb. But it's a family movie....
It's campy, and it's all about the naturalist message. So don't watch it if you take movies really fucking seriously or if you love global warming.
|