Cyberdemon
Register | User Profile | Member List | F.A.Q | Privacy Policy | New Blog | Search Forums | Forums Home
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > Woman takes her own life--asks not to be revived
Should the doctors have saved her?
Yes
No
Not sure!
View Results [Edit Poll (moderators only)]
Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Author
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:04. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Hellbent
Forum Staple


Posts: 2233
Registered: 06-00


http://news.aol.com/article/coroner...t-kerrie/697884

(Oct. 1) -- Doctors who let a 26-year-old woman die after she swallowed antifreeze acted within the law, a coroner has ruled.
Kerrie Wooltorton, of Norwich in eastern England, is believed to be the first person to use a living will to commit suicide, The Guardian newspaper reported Thursday.
She wrote the document on Sept. 15, 2007, three days before she poisoned herself. She called an ambulance, which took her to Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. There, she gave doctors a letter addressed to "To whom this may concern."

"If I come into hospital regarding an overdose or any attempt of my life, I would like for NO life saving treatment to be given," she wrote in the letter, which Sky News printed on its Web site.

"I am aware that you may think that because I called the ambulance I therefore want treatment, THIS IS NOT THE CASE! I do however want to be comfortable as nobody wants to die alone and scared and without going into details there are loads of reasons I do not want to die at home which I realize you will not understand and I apologise for this," she wrote. Wooltorton had been depressed over her inability to have a child, an inquest into her death heard. Doctors said they feared they would be charged with assault if they treated her because she had made her wishes clear, The Telegraph reported.


"It is a double-bind for doctors. She was very clear in her wishes. To have forced treatment on her would have been unlawful," hospital spokesman Andrew Stronach said, according to the Norwich Evening News.

Her family has said doctors should have tried to save her, despite her written instructions. But the doctors said Wooltorton was considered mentally competent to decide on treatment -- or refuse it.

"Please be assured that I am 100% aware of the consequences of this and the probable outcome of drinking antifreeze, eg death in 95-99% of cases and if I survive then kidney failure, I understand and accept them and will take 100% responsibility for this," she wrote.

Greater Norfolk Coroner William Armstrong said Monday that the hospital could not be blamed for Wooltorton's death. "She had capacity to consent to treatment which, it is more likely than not, would have prevented her death," he said. "She refused such treatment in full knowledge of the consequences and died as a result."

Living wills are commonly associated with people who are terminally ill and wish to refuse treatment, or people who would not want to be kept alive if they were mentally incapacitated in some sort of accident. In England, living wills were introduced under the 2005 Mental Capacity Act.

The ProLife Alliance called for a change in the law.
"A lot of people who attempt to commit suicide are thankful they have been revived the next day," said the group's chairwoman, Dominica Roberts.

Old Post 10-03-09 07:11 #
Hellbent is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Technician
Still no custom title


Posts: 2631
Registered: 08-04


It was very selfish for that woman to ask to die in the company and burden of strangers, not to mention strangers who took an oath to save lives.

Old Post 10-03-09 08:13 #
Technician is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Danarchy
YOU CAN'T CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS!


Posts: 14186
Registered: 01-01


Can't have a child so you kill yourself? It's like binary Darwinism.

Old Post 10-03-09 08:18 #
Danarchy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Starke Von Oben
Junior Member


Posts: 247
Registered: 09-09


This is utter madness.

I can understand if she was terminally ill and had deliberated upon the matter for a long time, but the inability to bare children is not an excuse. The idea that she was mentally competent is alarming, since she clearly needed some form of counselling - anyone who wants to die simply because they can't have what they want cannot be seen as sound of mind.

I believe it should be the individuals right to choose when they die, but this case isn't one of them.

Old Post 10-03-09 14:08 #
Starke Von Oben is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Eponasoft
Junior Member


Posts: 215
Registered: 07-09


For many people, the ability (or inability) to have children is an issue so important that it is literally life or death. And I know because I'm this way. For many years, I was incapable of getting anyone pregnant (due to an accident when I was a teenager), and I wanted children more than anyone. Now that I have children...if my children died, I would want the same. From a biological point of view, we exist simply to reproduce; that is our only purpose in life. When one cannot fulfill the most basic of human requirements, life has no meaning. So really, what she did was not all that unusual, and was totally understandable on a biological level. However, that ProLife Alliance should stay the fuck out of other people's business and stop trying to push their agenda.

__________________
Like most noobs, I too have a megawad project in progress...but unlike most noobs, I am keeping it very secret. Wait a sec...oh snap...!

Old Post 10-03-09 15:11 #
Eponasoft is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Scet
Junior Member


Posts: 225
Registered: 05-06



Eponasoft said:
From a biological point of view, we exist simply to reproduce


Only partially true, we exist to affect the environment around us. This can be done without reproduction. I'd say the point of life is to consume, reproduce, and be consumed. Even if you don't reproduce, you still had some affect on the ecosystem, all though it isn't as apparent as having children would be.


Eponasoft said:
However, that ProLife Alliance should stay the fuck out of other people's business and stop trying to push their agenda


I'm also getting tired of these "life is precious" christfags, because from a realistic perspective it isn't. Billions of organisms die every die, but you don't see them crying about that. Death is just as natural and necessary as birth.

Old Post 10-03-09 15:31 #
Scet is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Ralphis
Banned


Posts: 8179
Registered: 09-02



Scet said:
christfags...Death is just as natural and necessary as birth.


I don't believe you, show me

Old Post 10-03-09 15:37 #
Ralphis is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Scet
Junior Member


Posts: 225
Registered: 05-06



Ralphis said:
I don't believe you, show me


I don't believe you're serious.

How about you show me what makes life "sacred".

Old Post 10-03-09 15:55 #
Scet is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Starke Von Oben
Junior Member


Posts: 247
Registered: 09-09



Eponasoft said:
For many people, the ability (or inability) to have children is an issue so important that it is literally life or death. And I know because I'm this way. For many years, I was incapable of getting anyone pregnant (due to an accident when I was a teenager), and I wanted children more than anyone. Now that I have children...if my children died, I would want the same. From a biological point of view, we exist simply to reproduce; that is our only purpose in life. When one cannot fulfill the most basic of human requirements, life has no meaning. So really, what she did was not all that unusual, and was totally understandable on a biological level. However, that ProLife Alliance should stay the fuck out of other people's business and stop trying to push their agenda.


As a parent myself I understand that if my children died I would be distraught - that is natural. However if, before my children were born, I realised I couldn't have them I wouldn't kill myself over it. After your accident when you thought you couldn't get someone pregnant, were you suicidal over it? It's probably different for men however, and I may be another opinionated incompetent judge in all of this.

Ultimately life goes on, and this woman was only 27 years old. She should have had counselling. Biologically speaking it is unnatural to kill yourself over such an issue, since human beings are adaptable by nature and do not kill themselves when they approach hurdles in their life. If that were true then suicide rates would sky-rocket, since existence is ultimately one of suffering compared with the small sparks of happiness that occasionally jump up. I agree that the ultimate goal of life is to procreate and continue existence (they very survival of the species is at stake, according to Schopenhauerean thought). However I do not believe that is the reason for existence in itself. Life for beings with self awareness extends far beyond the limits of mere reproduction.

Old Post 10-03-09 15:57 #
Starke Von Oben is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
myk
Super Charge


Posts: 13106
Registered: 04-02


This case isn't too different from when someone refuses treatment for cancer or some other lethal affliction. It's only a bit trickier because of the immediate self-cause.

Incidentally, my sister-in-law's brother has a malignant tumor, and the other day he refused to be operated. The doctor agreed not to operate, as in the quoted article above.


Scet said:
I'm also getting tired of these "life is precious" christfags, because from a realistic perspective it isn't.
You're just justifying your own execution with that. The point of the right to life is a sort of projection. It's there for the same reason murder is a sin or illegal. We don't want to die, so we try to respect each others' lives. Death is pretty easy to inflict, and irreversible, so we have to be careful about what we allow.

The reason why there may be exceptions, such as in this case or with abortion, is mainly because the death is self-inflicted, not because we computed a statistic and, after finding many people or living beings die daily, we callously concluded human life isn't worth much. If one has a right to life, no other could have a right to one's own death but oneself.

The "pro-life" people have their share of dumb arguments and positions, but those "Darwinist" "it happens in nature, so it's right" arguments are just as lame, if not worse, or are at least food for their fire. It's a strain of the "I saw it on TV" syndrome.

Old Post 10-03-09 16:09 #
myk is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Patrick
someone employed to clean and maintain a building


Posts: 1937
Registered: 02-07


I find this perfectly acceptable. If you want to die, then by all means die. My only qualm is that you should really, really, really think about it and consider if why you kill yourself is really worth it. If you want to die becaues of say, a bad breakup, you should really think it out because it isnt worth it. If its because you have cancer and have nothing to live for anyways, take the time to make amends with everyone then do as this lady did.

Old Post 10-03-09 16:33 #
Patrick is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Aliotroph?
postCount++


Posts: 588
Registered: 03-02


The doctors did right. The woman probably did something dumb, but meh. People have that right.

Old Post 10-03-09 16:41 #
Aliotroph? is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Scet
Junior Member


Posts: 225
Registered: 05-06



myk said:
It's there for the same reason murder is a sin or illegal. We don't want to die, so we try to respect each others' lives.


I never said people should just go around killing each other. Simply that there's more to life than reproduction and that death is a part of life. I guess since I think people have the right to suicide, I must be some evil "darwinist".

Old Post 10-03-09 17:01 #
Scet is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
AndrewB
What's the worst that could happen? A girl is emotionally destroyed? I can live with that.


Posts: 3798
Registered: 05-00


The doctors did the right thing. There is nothing wrong with the laws as they stand. If the laws were changed to force doctors to rescue these types of patients, then it would simply force these people to commit suicide in private, which I'm sure they would. I can't see how anyone would benefit from that.

I also live in a part of the world where this type of suicide is legal. Also, the idea that "if you want to end your life then you can't possibly be of sound mind" is ridiculous. People who say this are almost invariably committed to the religious idea of "sanctity of life".

Old Post 10-03-09 17:47 #
AndrewB is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Zaldron
Sex Cauldron


Posts: 9910
Registered: 08-00


Doctors did the right thing, although I'm mildly irked at the use of resources better dedicated to tend those with intentions to live. Then again, she's got a valid point: there needs to be a reasonably decent way to take your life that is constructed as a true and solid State organism or at least with consent from it..I'm not going to say "with honor", as dying is often a matter of pain, tears, crapping your pants and farting venomous fumes while sporting a clowny rictus and an inappropriate attire. But surely there has to be something better than swelling up in the dark corner of a desert house.

Regardless of motive or principles, there should be a right to die in decency. Considering how we do have such a thing as the right to live a decent life (either as a semantic atomic statement or the compound effect of all rights), which is by itself the hardest thing for a State to provide, I don't see why this should be a big deal. "Reasons" are not to be regarded in the creation of rights. The moment you add a component of "validation" to a particular individual's access to any given right, you invalidate the concept itself. Rights are not earned, given away, taken from you or modified according to your actions, repulsive as they may be.

Old Post 10-03-09 18:03 #
Zaldron is offline Profile || Blog || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
myk
Super Charge


Posts: 13106
Registered: 04-02



Scet said:
I never said people should just go around killing each other.
And why not? Unless life is precious, after all...


Simply that there's more to life than reproduction and that death is a part of life.
Yeah, but the dilemma lies in decisions about life and death, made by people.

In a case like the one presented in the article it's very hard to know what the consequences of one choice or the other are. It puts the responsibility of the doctors in the balance, both in that they try to save lives and in respect to professional accountability. It also puts us in the face of the fickleness of life. One day someone wants to kill herself, the next perhaps she'd be happy to be alive. People make mistakes they regret all the time.


I guess since I think people have the right to suicide, I must be some evil "darwinist".
I wasn't disagreeing with that in particular, but with the reasoning. My point was that if one has a right to suicide, it's because one has a right to live, and that right is there because life is priceless. A "right to suicide" is tricky because it could be abused, and it could make it harder to save people where some boldness or intrusiveness by those trying to save them could otherwise perhaps have freed them from a temporary suicidal period.

Old Post 10-03-09 18:14 #
myk is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Ralphis
Banned


Posts: 8179
Registered: 09-02



Scet said:


I don't believe you're serious.

How about you show me what makes life "sacred".



I never said it was, so why are you quoting the word sacred?

Old Post 10-03-09 18:59 #
Ralphis is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Patrick
someone employed to clean and maintain a building


Posts: 1937
Registered: 02-07


I like to think of this in terms of ownership. The most important think we own which cannot willingly be taken from us is our life. It is unlawful for anyone to take someone else's property, including life. Now if you want to take your own life, that's fine because its yours to decide on how you treat it. Just remember that once it's gone, you can't have it back :P

Life==property. Do what you want with your own property.

Old Post 10-03-09 19:00 #
Patrick is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Coopersville
#1 in da hood, G


Posts: 2342
Registered: 10-01


She wrote 'do not revive' in her will, and that's that. But I do agree that it was selfish to bring the doctors into this, since it's obviously a gaping moral and legal grey area not worth risking someone's hard earned career for.

Old Post 10-03-09 20:00 #
Coopersville is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Eponasoft
Junior Member


Posts: 215
Registered: 07-09



Starke Von Oben said:

After your accident when you thought you couldn't get someone pregnant, were you suicidal over it?


Well, it certainly didn't help my already bad situation. I did attempt suicide not long afterward, though it was not the direct cause. Fortunately, I survived, and was able to have children after almost 15 years of recovery and healing.

I don't think that counseling would have helped this woman. She likely had nothing "wrong" with her that was out of the ordinary. But without knowing the whole story, it's hard to know for sure...we can only speculate. Besides, why couldn't she have children? Did she have no ovaries? Was her uterus incapable of supporting a zygote? Or was it that she simply couldn't find anyone to have sex with? I guess only she knew.

__________________
Like most noobs, I too have a megawad project in progress...but unlike most noobs, I am keeping it very secret. Wait a sec...oh snap...!

Old Post 10-03-09 20:46 #
Eponasoft is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Snarboo
Senior Member


Posts: 1781
Registered: 09-04


She could have adopted a child if she really wanted one. It's not the same, but there are a lot of needy children out there.

As for the original issue, I'm not sure how I feel about it. I believe a person has the right to their own life, even if that means taking it, but at the same time I know that a lot of those who try and take their life but survive regret it later. It was also selfish, as Technician said, for her to do so in the company of trained professionals whose very job is to prevent her from dying.

Old Post 10-03-09 20:49 #
Snarboo is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Eponasoft
Junior Member


Posts: 215
Registered: 07-09



Snarboo said:
She could have adopted a child if she really wanted one. It's not the same, but there are a lot of needy children out there.

So very true. But not a lot of people think about doing that...we're not really mentally designed to take "ownership" of someone else's child. My wife and I are considering becoming foster parents here in PR, as there are a lot of kids that need homes.

__________________
Like most noobs, I too have a megawad project in progress...but unlike most noobs, I am keeping it very secret. Wait a sec...oh snap...!

Old Post 10-03-09 21:08 #
Eponasoft is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Snarboo
Senior Member


Posts: 1781
Registered: 09-04


That's why I'm wondering if maybe she did need counseling, as a counselor could have pointed that out to her. Did she not have any friends, family to talk to?

Old Post 10-03-09 22:39 #
Snarboo is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Visplane Overflow
Banned


Posts: 154
Registered: 08-08


Suppose a person wants to kill themself. We can't see into the future; maybe this person can be helped - maybe someone can talk them out of suicide and then that person goes on to live a happy, productive life. Obviously it was appropriate to help this person, even if they didn't want it.

Maybe their situation isn't fixable. Maybe suicide really would end their suffering. Is it right to assume that the latter is always true? Why? That's a pretty callous and immature attitude if you ask me. (nobody asked me)

I've never known anyone that seriously contemplated suicide, but I've had friends with self-destructive habits, and I've helped them. They didn't want my help, but they're better off now. Why would anyone find it so wrong to at least try to help someone in trouble, no matter what?

By the way, human life is precious. Goes with that whole 'no two people are the same' thing. Don't go all nihilist on me now.

Old Post 10-04-09 11:09 #
Visplane Overflow is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Ichor
The Mysterious Red Square


Posts: 6612
Registered: 07-02


Did anyone else read the title as "Woman takes her own life, then asks not to be revived"?

Old Post 10-05-09 12:34 #
Ichor is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Use3D
Forum Spammer


Posts: 3516
Registered: 04-02



Scet said:

I guess since I think people have the right to suicide, I must be some evil "darwinist".



Why? People have no control over how, when and where they are born, why should they control how, when and where they die? Because they can? tsk tsk.

Old Post 10-05-09 17:31 #
Use3D is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Nomad
Senior Member


Posts: 1041
Registered: 04-04



Snarboo said:
She could have adopted a child if she really wanted one. It's not the same, but there are a lot of needy children out there.


Unfortunately it's not always that easy to adopt. Especially if she's single. Adoption agencies are often very strict about how and who they adopt to.

Old Post 10-05-09 18:58 #
Nomad is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Snarboo
Senior Member


Posts: 1781
Registered: 09-04



Nomad said:
Unfortunately it's not always that easy to adopt. Especially if she's single. Adoption agencies are often very strict about how and who they adopt to.
That's true. It was just something I was thinking of when the story mentioned she couldn't have children.

Old Post 10-05-09 19:04 #
Snarboo is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
40oz
Formerly JohnnyRancid


Posts: 2326
Registered: 08-07


I'm not sure you are allowed to write a will like that in the United States, because it has to be approved by a court to go into effect, and I'm pretty sure anything illegal in your will (such as requiring those to assist in your suicide) would not be approved.

Old Post 10-05-09 19:40 #
40oz is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Nomad
Senior Member


Posts: 1041
Registered: 04-04


You can have a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) order placed in your will in the US. However, I think it only covers certain things like cardiac arrest.

Old Post 10-05-09 20:17 #
Nomad is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy Report to mod || IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:04. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > Woman takes her own life--asks not to be revived

Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are OFF
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - Doomworld >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Forums Directory