Doomworld Forums - What's up with Firefox version numbers?

Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5

Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > What's up with Firefox version numbers?

Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Author

All times are GMT. The time now is 14:55.

Sodaholic
MY POSTS AREN'T THAT BAD!! SERIOUSLY!!!

Posts: 1369
Registered: 04-07

I've noticed that Mozilla has been releasing whole new version numbers much more quickly than they used to, despite being (seemingly) minor changes, just like when they spent more time on single versions. I mean shit, 4 was barely that long ago at ALL, and now we're at 8?

Is there a good reason for speeding up how fast whole new versions are introduced?

4 doesn't seem very different than 8 (on the surface anyway), whereas the transition from 3 to 4 was pretty big.

11-22-11 00:19 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

yukib1t
Will DDR for food

Posts: 2160
Registered: 06-02

Blame Chrome

11-22-11 00:21 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Maes
I like big butts!

Posts: 8662
Registered: 07-06

They decided to go on a constant 6-month major release cycle sometime after 4.0

11-22-11 00:22 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Grain of Salt
Member

Posts: 629
Registered: 12-10

"Firefox 5 was released on June 21, 2011, only three months after the major release of Firefox 4. Firefox 5 is the first release as part of Mozilla's new rapid release plan, matching Google Chrome's rapid release schedule and rapid version number increments."

11-22-11 00:24 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Maes
I like big butts!

Posts: 8662
Registered: 07-06

SODAHOLIC'S IGNORANCE OF WHAT'S GOING ON ON THE INTERNETS IS QUITE BAD!! SERIOUSLY!!!

11-22-11 00:26 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Gez
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!

Posts: 7042
Registered: 07-07

When they reach Firefox 64, will it become a Nintendo-exclusive browser?

11-22-11 00:40 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Snakes
Senior Member

Posts: 1538
Registered: 09-09

What's up with all of the Sodaholic and GoatLord threads lately?

11-22-11 00:45 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

chungy
Doomworld is so about bullshit excuses

Posts: 1458
Registered: 06-05

Meanwhile I have Chromium 15 installed, which sounds just as bad. The rapid release schedule is desirable for progress of web technologies. Keeping traditional versioning schemes doesn't really work with that. Otherwise it'll be 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, etc... until what? 4.32? By then 4.32 might seem like a big enough step from 4.0 to have warranted several "major" version bumps, even though teh change will seem minor compared to 4.31, and that minor compared to 4.30, and so on. (Emacs predates the browsers... it skipped from version 1.12 to version 13 when the authors realized they may never leave 1.x otherwise, essentally that first number became meaningless)

To both Google and Mozilla's credit, they have seriously downplayed the prevalance of the version number. What matters now is that users are up to date, and by most common installation modes, that happens fairly automatic for both of them. How many people can really tell that they're on Firefox 8 without having to open Help>About, or that they're on Chrome/Chromium 15 without opening its about dialog? Probably not many.

11-22-11 00:46 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Sodaholic
MY POSTS AREN'T THAT BAD!! SERIOUSLY!!!

Posts: 1369
Registered: 04-07

Why does Mozilla feel the need to emulate Google in it's numbering scheme? Why not just act independently?

Snakes said:
What's up with all of the Sodaholic and GoatLord threads lately?

What do you mean? Is it that we've been posting more threads lately, or that you find something wrong with the threads/posters themselves? Don't feel afraid to tell me if it's the latter, I prefer to know if people have a problem with me than not knowing at all.

11-22-11 00:59 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

xepop
Junior Member

Posts: 186
Registered: 10-09

3.x was last good one. Then they fucked up.

11-22-11 01:06 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

I'myourtarget
Junior Member

Posts: 167
Registered: 04-11

Sodaholic said:

What do you mean? Is it that we've been posting more threads lately, or that you find something wrong with the threads/posters themselves? Don't feel afraid to tell me if it's the latter, I prefer to know if people have a problem with me than not knowing at all.

Personally, I just find it amusing. Goatlord keeps posting these weird philosophical threads about what we think will happen in the future and whatnot whilst you post threads about your opinions, strange observations, or just somewhat weird questions.

Just my opinion though, and I'm not even sure if I'm even stating my opinion correctly.

...IGNORE MEH.

11-22-11 01:17 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Snakes
Senior Member

Posts: 1538
Registered: 09-09

Pretty much that ^

I was kind of amused at the amount if "What's going on with such n such" theme all of these threads seem to have. Can't recall such an abundance of like-titled threads since the short-lived "Ask me about being" meme popped up in blogs.

11-22-11 01:35 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Sodaholic
MY POSTS AREN'T THAT BAD!! SERIOUSLY!!!

Posts: 1369
Registered: 04-07

I'myourtarget said:
or just somewhat weird questions.

In your opinion, what is the weirdest question I have ever asked on these forums?

11-22-11 01:47 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

GreyGhost
a ghost... only grey

Posts: 5703
Registered: 01-08

Make that the topic of your next thread. :P

11-22-11 02:44 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Technician
Still no custom title

Posts: 5772
Registered: 08-04

Opera is already at version eleven. But to be fair, Opera is much older than Firefox.

11-22-11 02:46 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

hex11
Senior Member

Posts: 1481
Registered: 09-09

So is it getting better, or just more bloated? I'm still at 3.0.18 (but hardly ever use it).

11-22-11 13:18 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

tempun
Member

Posts: 447
Registered: 08-09

Sodaholic said:
Why does Mozilla feel the need to emulate Google in it's numbering scheme? Why not just act independently?

If you think an idea is good, why not borrow it?

11-22-11 15:21 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

tempun
Member

Posts: 447
Registered: 08-09

xepop said:
3.x was last good one. Then they fucked up.

Tried v3.6 now, I can't go back to it from version 8. v3.6 is slower than molasses.

11-22-11 15:23 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

dew
Feral Kid

Posts: 1702
Registered: 05-08

agreed, 2.x and 3.x were slower than iceberg drift and oh god the memory leaks.

11-22-11 15:26 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

I'myourtarget
Junior Member

Posts: 167
Registered: 04-11

Sodaholic said:

In your opinion, what is the weirdest question I have ever asked on these forums?

That one.

Hell, I don't know. There have been a few, but I can't recall any specifics.

11-22-11 15:38 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Sodaholic
MY POSTS AREN'T THAT BAD!! SERIOUSLY!!!

Posts: 1369
Registered: 04-07

tempun said:
If you think an idea is good, why not borrow it?

How on earth is making versions with large gaps in numbering, when in fact they're only rather minor updates in any way a good idea? It's exaggerated, and way too much as well.

11-22-11 16:50 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

chungy
Doomworld is so about bullshit excuses

Posts: 1458
Registered: 06-05

I thought I explained it in my post -- the frequent release schedule doesn't lend itself well to the traditional version numbers. Rather than essentially having the browser in feature freeze for 1 or 2 years until the next major version, Mozilla is just rolling out new features as they're ready (well, to the tune of 3 months, but it's much better). All of these releases are going to seem "minor" compared to the old concepts of what a major version number was -- if the old system was stuck to, we'd never leave the 4.x series, and the "4." part would essentially become meaningless; all Mozilla has really done, is get rid of the useless part of a version number, there's only going to be one number that gets updated frequently anyway.

11-22-11 17:12 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

hex11
Senior Member

Posts: 1481
Registered: 09-09

http://slackware.com/faq/do_faq.php?faq=general#0

Gotta keep up with the joneses. ;)

11-22-11 18:12 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Blzut3
Junior Member

Posts: 210
Registered: 06-04

Many major projects come to the conclusion of dropping the major version number. One early example that comes to mind is Java which despite being at version 1.7 is commonly referred to as Java 7.

Another recent example is the Linux kernel where the major version number was also dropped since it would indefinitely be in 2.6.X. Linus just decided to make the major number arbitrary and move the X to the minor position. Hence why we have Linux 3.0, 3.2, etc.

Chungy explained it quite well I think. They aren't really copying anyone, the traditional version scheme just doesn't work anymore. These days you see two dominant formats. One is to drop the idea of major/minor. The other is to version by date (Ubuntu style). If the rapid version number increases bother you, just tack a 4. in front of it (so Firefox 4.8.0) since that's really all that happened.

11-22-11 18:17 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Cyanosis
Member

Posts: 650
Registered: 10-10

I'm on 3.6.20 and refuse to update. I did try out 4 which was nearly immediately updated to 5 and I was like what? Strange problems I had with a couple of sites I did not experience before and the performance/CPU usage seemed to be worse. As a side effect I can't upload files to MediaFire anymore because they use some shitty new interface method that isn't compatible with my version of FF so I have to use another one to bypass it.

I wish everything would just stop downgrading itself. Just about every program I've ever used has had a horrible recent revision. And what gets me even more is you are forced to update whether you like it or not (unless you disable updates but this does not apply to all applications) and whatever didn't need fixing before winds up getting broken in the new version. Hideous mess some of these browser/software have become.

11-22-11 18:37 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Mr. T
Senior Member

Posts: 1270
Registered: 12-03

4 was a decent update IMO. 3.x was as slow as shit. TBH FF still has it's ups and downs, but still deserves an internet medal for sinking IE.

11-22-11 20:59 #

Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy

IP || Edit/Delete || Quote

Creaphis
I will deliberately take a contrary position just for the sake of writing incredibly long arguments

Posts: 3991
Registered: 10-05

I guess that the rapidly-incrementing version numbers make sense if that's just how things are done nowadays. It annoys me a little bit, though, because I've been conditioned to associate version number increases with major improvements, but the only change I've noticed is that I'm actually having more issues with Firefox eating memory than I used to.

I just noticed that Skulltag is also doing things Google's way. The latest update is simply "98b."

11-22-11 21:52 #