Cacodemon
Register | User Profile | Member List | F.A.Q | Privacy Policy | New Blog | Search Forums | Forums Home
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > The Hobbit -- 3 films
Pages (2): « 1 [2]  
Author
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:04. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
DoomCup
Green Marine


Posts: 47
Registered: 11-07


That's not even to mention that for the longest time in human history, there wasn't a copyright. People wrote and sang and stuff anyway. In fact, a lot of the legends that come down to us are multiple stories by multiple authors woven together. The legends of King Arthur and his knights are a good example.

Old Post 09-16-12 23:51 #
DoomCup is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
188DarkRevived
Banned


Posts: 1293
Registered: 06-04



Doom Marine said:
Anyone who complains about this series being too long is not a true fan. I'm looking forward to the 12-hour extended edition marathons.


Avoozl said
They seem to be pulling a "Star Wars" now. :P


If Lucas ever dared to divide Episode3 into at least two parts then I would've been extremely disappointed rather than satisfied, because the rise of Lord Vader has already been done gradually enough.

But he does need to make more films to continue the story of Han Solo and Leia raising their new family. And there's plenty of novels for him to translate to the big screen now. :p
He's lagging behind from the authors.

Old Post 09-17-12 00:58 #
188DarkRevived is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Enjay
ASK ME ABOUT FOOTBALL / STEAM / DEAD CELEBRITIES / THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT


Posts: 6381
Registered: 12-00



DarkJedi188 said:
If Lucas ever dared to divide Episode3 into at least two parts then I would've been extremely disappointed rather than satisfied, because the rise of Lord Vader has already been done gradually enough.

I thought the rise of Vader was far too sudden and that most of the foreshadowing was cursory and discontinuous. My biggest gripe with Ep1-3 is that I think GL started at the wrong point. If Anakin had been about 17 when he was discovered (perhaps as a tearaway teen doing spice runs for smugglers or something that involved actual, you know, piloting), there would have been more time to do justice to his fall and also paint a better picture of his and Kenobi's friendship. It would have also served as a better parallel for Luke's story.

Old Post 09-17-12 19:15 #
Enjay is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
NiGHTMARE
Forum Legend


Posts: 5012
Registered: 05-00


On the other side of things, I've read numerous stories based on the Cthulu mythos that surpass anything HP Lovecraft himself ever wrote.

There are some damned fine Sherlock Holmes stories written by people other than Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, too.

And of course there are also some great Lovecraftian Holmes tales out there... ;)

Old Post 09-17-12 19:28 #
NiGHTMARE is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
hex11
Senior Member


Posts: 2237
Registered: 09-09



neubejiita said:
I have just bought the book of The Hobbit and I will just read that instead of bothering with the movie. I am loving it so far. And it was only 14.95, so I could not turn it down.


Yeah the book is wonderful and very accessible, even for kids. I must have read it a dozen times in my early teens, sometimes restarting at the beginning immediately after finishing it. LOTR was a much harder read and completely different subject matter, even though it takes place in the same world. But I still prefer those books to the films, because I don't much like "real" live actors in that type of high fantasy setting. So in that respect, the old Ralph Bakshi animations were better IMO, even though they're technically light years behind. Btw, I'm sure you can find even cheaper prices if you look for used copies (older editions). These books were printed in the millions...

Old Post 09-18-12 06:32 #
hex11 is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Mr. T
Senior Member


Posts: 1486
Registered: 12-03



Enjay said:

I thought the rise of Vader was far too sudden and that most of the foreshadowing was cursory and discontinuous. My biggest gripe with Ep1-3 is that I think GL started at the wrong point. If Anakin had been about 17 when he was discovered (perhaps as a tearaway teen doing spice runs for smugglers or something that involved actual, you know, piloting), there would have been more time to do justice to his fall and also paint a better picture of his and Kenobi's friendship. It would have also served as a better parallel for Luke's story.



I agree with this, except I think it should have started even later.

Imagine how much cooler the prequels would have been if they'd started with or just before Darth Vader "killing" Anakin, and had been about Darth Vader flying around the galaxy wasting Jedi. With actual scenes on Alderaan. It could even be actually dramatic if it had scenes where Obi-Wan and Vader meet, with the former slowly coming to the realization that the later is beyond redemption, then going to hide his ass on Tatooine.

Or how much better ROTJ would have been if they'd stuck with their plan and had a huge battle between Wookies and AT-STs on the Wookie planet instead of god damn Ewoks. Fuck you, George Lucas!!!

Old Post 09-18-12 07:08 #
Mr. T is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3841
Registered: 04-04


Plinkett said everything I could possibly say about the SW prequel trilogy.

They're a terrible mess of a film saga which needlessly fuck around with things that have been established in the OT.

Old Post 09-18-12 08:55 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Belial
Senior Member


Posts: 2270
Registered: 09-05



DoomUK said:
Plinkett said everything I could possibly say about the SW prequel trilogy.

I had more fun watching the reviews than when I tried watching episode 1.

Old Post 09-18-12 09:20 #
Belial is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
LakiSoft
Banned


Posts: 192
Registered: 09-12


No, no, no this again!

I hate song "They're taking the hobbits to Isengard!"
God please don't let these people to make more movies about freakin hobbits.

Old Post 09-27-12 13:54 #
LakiSoft is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Enjay
ASK ME ABOUT FOOTBALL / STEAM / DEAD CELEBRITIES / THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT


Posts: 6381
Registered: 12-00


Heh, my biggest problem with the LotR films is that I don't give a damn about those annoying parochial Hobbits or their shire. Yes, I understand the symbolism and all they are supposed to represent but, to me, they just come across as small minded, mired in the past, smug, self-congratulatory, annoying bumpkins with hugely limited horizons and annoying "couthie"* songs. And they're short with hairy feet. What sort of hero is half the height of a regular person and has hairy feet?

Ask me about Hobbits. :P



couthie (Scots)
adj. Of people or their qualities: agreeable, sociable, friendly, sympathetic. Of things or places: comfortable, snug, neat. Pleasant, agreeable.

Old Post 09-27-12 21:44 #
Enjay is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
LakiSoft
Banned


Posts: 192
Registered: 09-12


Enjay, whatever you said, i totally 100% agree with you. Stupid hobbits. :P

Old Post 09-27-12 21:47 #
LakiSoft is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
188DarkRevived
Banned


Posts: 1293
Registered: 06-04



Mr. T said:
Or how much better ROTJ would have been if they'd stuck with their plan and had a huge battle between Wookies and AT-STs on the Wookie planet instead of god damn Ewoks. Fuck you, George Lucas!!!

I've always liked both Ewoks and Wookies equally. They're like cousin species, in a way. Almost like the Romulans and the Vulcans in Star Trek. Got the same anatomical and cultural roots deep down.
And yes, they're all more fascinating than hobbits. :p

Old Post 09-28-12 02:12 #
188DarkRevived is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
CODOR
Forum Regular


Posts: 836
Registered: 02-06



fraggle said:
They can't use anything from the Silmarillion or any of the other writings because they don't have the rights to it.
That's unfortunate, I was hoping "The Quest Of Erebor" from Unfinished Tales could be used to link the War Of The Dwarves And Orcs as told in the Appendix of LOTR to "The Hobbit". Or at least explain why Gandalf wanted Bilbo to go with the dwarves and how he managed to convince the dwarves to take him...

Old Post 09-28-12 02:27 #
CODOR is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
chungy
Senior Member


Posts: 1833
Registered: 06-05


Did you guys hear about Bilbo being murdered last night by the Blair Witch? Poor guy, didn't even get to play Football Manager 2012 he was downloading from Steam at the time.

True story.

Old Post 09-28-12 03:27 #
chungy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
hex11
Senior Member


Posts: 2237
Registered: 09-09



LakiSoft said:
No, no, no this again!

I hate song "They're taking the hobbits to Isengard!"
God please don't let these people to make more movies about freakin hobbits.



How about some hobbit rap?
http://lordsoftherhymes.com/

Old Post 09-28-12 03:30 #
hex11 is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3841
Registered: 04-04



Enjay said:
Heh, my biggest problem with the LotR films is that I don't give a damn about those annoying parochial Hobbits or their shire. Yes, I understand the symbolism and all they are supposed to represent but, to me, they just come across as small minded, mired in the past, smug, self-congratulatory, annoying bumpkins with hugely limited horizons and annoying "couthie"* songs. And they're short with hairy feet. What sort of hero is half the height of a regular person and has hairy feet?

For me, the hobbits in the films aren't as bad as their original book incarnations. And even they are nowhere near as grating as Tom Bombadil. Yes, I know, he appears to be the most powerful entity in Middle Earth. So powerful the One Ring has no effect on him. But everything about the character is so nauseatingly twee, and I'm not just talking about those songs of his.

The only part of his chapter I liked was the incident with the barrow-downs. It's a pity they couldn't have been worked into the films somehow, maybe giving a less saccharin version of Tom a short cameo.

Old Post 09-28-12 11:40 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DooM_RO
Senior Member


Posts: 1532
Registered: 02-11



DoomUK said:

For me, the hobbits in the films aren't as bad as their original book incarnations. And even they are nowhere near as grating as Tom Bombadil. Yes, I know, he appears to be the most powerful entity in Middle Earth. So powerful the One Ring has no effect on him. But everything about the character is so nauseatingly twee, and I'm not just talking about those songs of his.

The only part of his chapter I liked was the incident with the barrow-downs. It's a pity they couldn't have been worked into the films somehow, maybe giving a less saccharin version of Tom a short cameo.



The Tolkien fans would have raged even more, we're a very sensitive bunch :P although I really like the movies(unlike so many others)

Old Post 09-28-12 14:09 #
DooM_RO is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3841
Registered: 04-04



DooM_RO said:
The Tolkien fans would have raged even more, we're a very sensitive bunch

Yeah I get that his absence from the films upset some people.

Honestly, if the character was portrayed anything like he's described in the books then it just wouldn't have worked.

Old Post 09-28-12 14:16 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
LakiSoft
Banned


Posts: 192
Registered: 09-12



hex11 said:


How about some hobbit rap?
http://lordsoftherhymes.com/



NO NO NO NO! PLEASE DON"T KILL ME! I HATE HOBBITS! PLZ REMOVE THAT LINK!

Old Post 09-28-12 14:20 #
LakiSoft is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Enjay
ASK ME ABOUT FOOTBALL / STEAM / DEAD CELEBRITIES / THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT


Posts: 6381
Registered: 12-00



DoomUK said:
For me, the hobbits in the films aren't as bad as their original book incarnations. And even they are nowhere near as grating as Tom Bombadil...

Agreed, so agreed.


chungy said:
Did you guys hear about Bilbo being murdered last night by the Blair Witch? Poor guy, didn't even get to play Football Manager 2012 he was downloading from Steam at the time.

True story.


I C WAT U DID THAR. ;)

Old Post 09-28-12 17:38 #
Enjay is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
chungy
Senior Member


Posts: 1833
Registered: 06-05



LakiSoft said:
NO NO NO NO! PLEASE DON"T KILL ME! I HATE HOBBITS! PLZ REMOVE THAT LINK!

Relax. They're not so bad, look:

Old Post 09-28-12 17:49 #
chungy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
LakiSoft
Banned


Posts: 192
Registered: 09-12



chungy said:

Relax. They're not so bad.



I am just kidding. :) And that song "They're taking the hobbits to Isengard" are something funny and something crap in same time. ;)

Old Post 09-28-12 18:25 #
LakiSoft is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
hex11
Senior Member


Posts: 2237
Registered: 09-09



DoomUK said:

For me, the hobbits in the films aren't as bad as their original book incarnations. And even they are nowhere near as grating as Tom Bombadil. Yes, I know, he appears to be the most powerful entity in Middle Earth. So powerful the One Ring has no effect on him. But everything about the character is so nauseatingly twee, and I'm not just talking about those songs of his.



It's not some innate or magical power, but rather his lack of character flaws that makes him impervious to the ring. Others, even powerful beings like Gandalf, elf lords, etc. all have some form of character weakness it can exploit, and they're wise enough to realize this. But Tom has no fears, ambitions, desires, etc. The ring doesn't have anything to work with. At least that's how I understand it (and it's been a long time since I read the books).

IRL nobody can completely escape corruption, and so Tom seems like an unrealistic character. But then again, so are wizards, elves, hobbits, etc... This type of character is not something to resent though, but rather strive for, as it can only bring more inner peace. It's something that religions and philosophies recognized ages ago (but of course, religions have their own corruption too, just like any other human social structure).

Old Post 09-28-12 20:03 #
hex11 is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3841
Registered: 04-04



hex11 said:


It's not some innate or magical power, but rather his lack of character flaws that makes him impervious to the ring. Others, even powerful beings like Gandalf, elf lords, etc. all have some form of character weakness it can exploit, and they're wise enough to realize this. But Tom has no fears, ambitions, desires, etc. The ring doesn't have anything to work with. At least that's how I understand it (and it's been a long time since I read the books).

IRL nobody can completely escape corruption, and so Tom seems like an unrealistic character. But then again, so are wizards, elves, hobbits, etc... This type of character is not something to resent though, but rather strive for, as it can only bring more inner peace. It's something that religions and philosophies recognized ages ago (but of course, religions have their own corruption too, just like any other human social structure).


Yes, you're right. He's still a ridiculous character though.

Old Post 09-28-12 20:15 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Enjay
ASK ME ABOUT FOOTBALL / STEAM / DEAD CELEBRITIES / THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT


Posts: 6381
Registered: 12-00



DoomUK said:
He's still a ridiculous character though.

Yes,
http://i.imgur.com/B63Ga.jpg
yes he is.

Old Post 09-28-12 23:46 #
Enjay is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Hellbent
Forum Bellend


Posts: 4782
Registered: 06-00


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...d-of-myths.html

By Christopher Howse -- 7:00PM BST 29 Sep 2012

The tale of The Hobbit will survive the film (with Billy Connolly as a dwarf warrior and Stephen Fry as the mayor of Lake-town) in the same way that the Iliad survived the film Troy (with Brad Pitt as Achilles). For The Hobbit, published 75 years ago, is not a fantasy-adventure as it is being described, but a myth, or part of a mythology.

J R R Tolkien’s telling of The Hobbit in 1937 was just one way that the story could have been told. Its narration is quite different from that of The Lord of the Rings. The Hobbit is joky, domestic and aimed at children. Tolkien happily illustrated it himself, unlike his more serious work, and the mysterious runes on the dustjacket are simply a transliteration of the English: “The Hobbit or There and Back Again, being the record of a year’s journey made by Bilbo Baggins…”

Peter Jackson’s film trilogy of The Hobbit – the first a royal performance in December – will iron out some of these differences. Film is only another form of story-telling. If you don’t like Tolkien’s prose (as many do not), then rewrite it in Latin hexameters if you wish. Someone once did that to Milton’s Paradise Lost in the vain hope of improving it.

People such as Billy Connolly find Tolkien “unreadable”, as he says, because they suppose it to be a fantasy of the dungeons and dragons genre. Tolkien’s aim was immeasurably higher – to provide England with the mythology it had lost. He may have been no great stylist (though his high, biblical register in The Lord of the Rings is often inattentively read, as attempts to parody it demonstrate). But he was an astonishing mythopoeist.

Tolkien’s starting point was the same as that of the Grimm brothers, whose work is in vogue once more: language. The Hobbit falls in the genre called Märchen, house-tales, or, in the misleading English translation, fairy tales. But it began with a word, Hobbit, for which Tolkien had to find an origin. For him, origins of words went to the mythic roots of the people who used them, even when those people were imaginary.

Old Post 10-01-12 04:02 #
Hellbent is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:04. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]  
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > The Hobbit -- 3 films

Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are OFF
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - Doomworld >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.