Maes
I like big butts!

Posts: 10163
Registered: 07-06 |
As if anything released after DX9 managed to become relevant to game development. DX9 is still king, through continuous updates spanning nearly a decade, almost like Windows XP.
Can you think of any exclusive e.g. DX 10/11 titles that you ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY can't enjoy unless you have Windows Vista/7? Or any developers that would take that gamble because they simply cannot live without DX10 features? The broken deliberately-locked Vista-only version of Halo doesn't count ;-)
kristus said:
Makes you wonder how they think at Microsoft. Here we have an OS from them. Windows 7 that people generally seem to really like. So they decide to make a new one to compete with it where they remove some key functionality, seemingly just to fuck with their users.
Maybe they don't want another Windows XP-like situation to develop, with a 10 year old-OS still clinging to a solid 30% of the market.
Their previous OSes (95/98/Me) were simply too flimsy and buggy to continue being used that long, but with XP they reached a "critical mass" that made long-term support viable. Only that long-term support and new OS sales don't go along very well.
The only way out is to artificially "kill" their own OSes, something which in the past happened automatically thanks to their infamous bugginess. Of course, sometimes the result can be FORCED and PAINFUL e.g. Vista. Touted as the ultimate "XP killer", forced down everybody's throat, it ended up being superseded by XP's SP3, and quickly patched up in order to become Windows 7...which ALSO is perhaps TOO good for its own, well, good.
Last edited by Maes on 11-13-12 at 17:35
|