Doom Marine
Senior Member

Posts: 1548
Registered: 09-03 |
While we share a different technological paradigm than cyberdemon butt, he has brought up important points concerning the sacrifice of endurance in the reduction of costs.
1. MLC is acceptable, TLC is approaching toilet paper disposability, no thank you.
2. Which is sooner to happen given similar start-times and regular usage: an SSD running out of write/erase cycles, or a spinning drive fucking up?
Another factor affecting write/erase endurance is the ever-shrinking lithography process. When SSDs were 34nm, their write/erase endurance were rated at 5,000. With current 25nm SSDs, it's reduced to 3,000. TLC makes it even worse, down to 1,000. The question is, at what point will the end-user find it unacceptable?
NAND flash doesn't seem to have a very bright future, given phase-change memory and memristors are on the horizon.
|