Archvile
Register | User Profile | Member List | F.A.Q | Privacy Policy | New Blog | Search Forums | Forums Home
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > First GMO babies born.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Author
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:50. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
neubejiita
Member


Posts: 663
Registered: 02-09


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread932197/pg2

Is this the start of the Gattaca revolution? What have we done? These babies will be the first of a new species of genetically perfect humans free of disease. How soon until we have genetically engineered Ultramarines to fight the Xenos in some future war?

Old Post 03-11-13 01:06 #
neubejiita is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
fraggle
Filled with the code of Doom


Posts: 7483
Registered: 07-00


"abovetopsecret.com" in a forum called "General Conspiracies". Seems like a legit source.

Old Post 03-11-13 01:10 #
fraggle is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Scet
Member


Posts: 516
Registered: 05-06


How about an actual article and not a blurb on some crackpot conspiracy website?

Old Post 03-11-13 01:14 #
Scet is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
buttspit
Member


Posts: 561
Registered: 04-11


I get more worked up from the masses that cry foul whenever GMO is brought up than what GMO can offer.

Old Post 03-11-13 01:39 #
buttspit is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Kirby
Senior Member


Posts: 1548
Registered: 10-04


Indeed, how about the actual article? How can anyone on that site take those blurbs seriously when there's no confirmation of where it came from?

Old Post 03-11-13 01:43 #
Kirby is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
188DarkRevived
Banned


Posts: 1293
Registered: 06-04


How many years left until the attack of the clone army? :p

Old Post 03-11-13 01:54 #
188DarkRevived is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Platinum Shell
Forum Regular


Posts: 772
Registered: 08-11


I smell salad...of a rutabaga variety.

Old Post 03-11-13 02:20 #
Platinum Shell is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Nomad
Not dumb enough to get a custom title


Posts: 2664
Registered: 04-04



buttspit said:
I get more worked up from the masses that cry foul whenever GMO is brought up than what GMO can offer.


THIS. Jesus christ this topic really brings the idiots out of the woodwork.

Also, pretty sure we've been doing genetic manipulation for quite a while now; choosing baby's eye color, etc.

Last edited by Nomad on 03-11-13 at 04:05

Old Post 03-11-13 03:58 #
Nomad is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
GreyGhost
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 8585
Registered: 01-08



Scet said:
How about an actual article and not a blurb on some crackpot conspiracy website?
Here you go - direct from that bastion of journalistic credibility, the Daily Mail.

Old Post 03-11-13 04:42 #
GreyGhost is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Aliotroph?
postCount++


Posts: 2583
Registered: 03-02


If the article is accurate (stupid Daily Mail) then this is pretty neat. It sounds as if the eggs may contain mitochondria from both mothers. I don't have nearly enough knowledge of biology to speculate on what effect that might have.

Old Post 03-11-13 07:47 #
Aliotroph? is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
printz
CRAZY DUMB ZEALOT


Posts: 8780
Registered: 06-06


What is this GMO you speak of?

__________________
Automatic Wolfenstein - Version 1.0 - also on Android

Old Post 03-11-13 14:09 #
printz is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Scet
Member


Posts: 516
Registered: 05-06



The babies were born to women who had problems conceiving. Extra genes from a female donor were inserted into their eggs before they were fertilised in an attempt to enable them to conceive.


Hardly sounds like the evil mutant clone army that abovetopsecret.com is going on about.

Old Post 03-11-13 14:18 #
Scet is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3841
Registered: 04-04



printz said:
What is this GMO you speak of?

Best guess.

Anyway, the smell of bullshit here is so pungent it could render you unconscious.

Old Post 03-11-13 14:40 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
printz
CRAZY DUMB ZEALOT


Posts: 8780
Registered: 06-06


Nice. If they can't do human cloning, at least they should be able to do this.

__________________
Automatic Wolfenstein - Version 1.0 - also on Android

Old Post 03-11-13 16:42 #
printz is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
yukib1t
Will DDR for food


Posts: 2512
Registered: 06-02



neubejiita said:
How soon until we have genetically engineered Ultramarines to fight the Xenos in some future war?
A few ten thousand years. In the meantime, we need moar dakka.

Old Post 03-11-13 19:07 #
yukib1t is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Clonehunter
Forum Staple


Posts: 3618
Registered: 03-10


oh shit clones what are we gonna do





go science




Though granted, actual cloning I think would be something rather interesting.

Old Post 03-12-13 13:33 #
Clonehunter is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
chungy
Senior Member


Posts: 1829
Registered: 06-05


it's like gggmork but with better English.

Old Post 03-12-13 21:57 #
chungy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Technician
Still no custom title


Posts: 7829
Registered: 08-04



Clonehunter said:
Though granted, actual cloning I think would be something rather interesting.
Why? Clones aren't rare in nature, or for humans, even.

Now if we're talking about duplicating somebodies brain patterns, maybe...

Old Post 03-12-13 22:11 #
Technician is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
hardcore_gamer
Fáviti Member


Posts: 2338
Registered: 03-07


I fail to see what is wrong with creating more stronger humans with genetic tampering.

I hate it whenever people use that horrible "but the Nazis wanted this also, so its bad" crap. The Nazis wanted a lot of things, like laws that banned animal abuse and awerness campaigns against the dangers of smoking. Simply pointing out that the nazis did something doesn't automatically make it evil.

Old Post 03-14-13 02:25 #
hardcore_gamer is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Joshy
Forum Regular


Posts: 964
Registered: 07-08


Oh yeah, GMO rocks cos genetically modified crops are doing sooooo well for us *cough*dyingbees?*cough*. Consider me a skeptic here, I'm against it for ethical reasons, the fact that I don't like science going beyond its boundaries particularly to accommodate business/economic needs rather than our needs (although that is quite a blurred line), and particularly as a Deaf person who is totally comfortable with his own 'disability' despite its inherent difficulties, (which has helped me harden against life's follies and existential crises) and would rather see the deaf community (and humanity in general) naturally thrive.

If I had to put it in a layman's term, I'd say, have a root, and raise what you've got. Go natural dudes!

Old Post 03-14-13 08:34 #
Joshy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
hardcore_gamer
Fáviti Member


Posts: 2338
Registered: 03-07



Joshy said:
Oh yeah, GMO rocks cos genetically modified crops are doing sooooo well for us *cough*dyingbees?*cough*. Consider me a skeptic here, I'm against it for ethical reasons, the fact that I don't like science going beyond its boundaries particularly to accommodate business/economic needs rather than our needs (although that is quite a blurred line), and particularly as a Deaf person who is totally comfortable with his own 'disability' despite its inherent difficulties, (which has helped me harden against life's follies and existential crises) and would rather see the deaf community (and humanity in general) naturally thrive.

If I had to put it in a layman's term, I'd say, have a root, and raise what you've got. Go natural dudes!



I really hate this bullshit about there being such a thing as a "natural" and a "un-natural life".

Naturality is a socially created construct. There is no such thing in actual nature. I mean life existing at all in the first place is because of un-natural things happening. Originally there were no people or animals, but then because of some freak mutations life evolved into new species and then humans. There is no such thing as natural anything when it comes to living things. We are all the result of some mutation that made us different from earlier generations of life.

I personally find the general notion that there is such thing as "science going beyond its boundaries" to be nothing but the non-sensical crying of people who just aren't comfortable with any kinds of change happening. "Science is evil" is something that only belongs in the minds of religious fundimentalists and nowhere else.

If future generations of humans can benefit from genetic tampering, then there isn't any good reason for why we should not do this. It honestly makes me want to kill myself when I hear someone claim that they would rather have their children be born with some horrible decease or handicap rather then have their genes tampered with because they would rather have sick but "natural" children rather then healthy but "un-natural" children.

Last edited by hardcore_gamer on 03-14-13 at 08:56

Old Post 03-14-13 08:49 #
hardcore_gamer is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Joshy
Forum Regular


Posts: 964
Registered: 07-08



hardcore_gamer said:
I really hate this bullshit about there being such a thing as a "natural" and a "un-natural life".

You're splitting hairs with the semantics of naturalness. Wow it's a social construct, duh, but that's not the point. It is bleeding obvious that genetically modified crops is not ideal. And yes, not everything is natural, but we have to live with it. I'm saying don't push it any further. There are mutations obviously, but GMO is NOT mutation. Darwin would be rolling in his grave. And just because I am against GMO does not mean I am against science. That's a horrible inference dude.

I'm really braindead right now, and was only wanting to share my opinion. But I'll say this: I'd suggest you actually contemplate about the actual issues at hand before you say anything; you spurt out a lot of silly naive generalisations and counterproductive comments. I'd make sure you wouldn't be studying ethics, and I don't mean that as an insult.

Old Post 03-14-13 09:03 #
Joshy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3841
Registered: 04-04



Joshy said:
[I] would rather see the deaf community (and humanity in general) naturally thrive.

You're not making the reasoning behind your views particularly clear.

Do you wear a hearing aid? If yes, then science was behind that. Nature* had nothing to do with it, and it's not going to be able to repair an irreversibly damaged eardrum by itself any time soon (or whatever misfortune was behind your "disability"). While it's wonderful that something so obviously detrimental to life as deafness doesn't appear to have affected you too negatively, I could see how it's easy for people to get the impression that you're being anti-science when you pontificate the superiority of pure resolve and nature's capabilities over science's helping hand.


*What constitutes something being natural is an interesting question. You could argue that everything in the world that's man-made is natural, whether it's good or bad for the environment around it, because purely biological forces were originally behind it. You can't have a watch, a car, a computer, an oil refinery, or indeed a hearing aid without someone's brain and hands organising its design and manufacture. What will become of this idea when we have man-made clones of ourselves making things, I don't know ;)

Last edited by DoomUK on 03-14-13 at 10:47

Old Post 03-14-13 10:25 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
kristus
Megablast!


Posts: 10605
Registered: 07-00



Joshy said:
Oh yeah, GMO rocks cos genetically modified crops are doing sooooo well for us *cough*dyingbees?*cough*.

Dying bees aren't because of genetically modified crops. But predominantly because of the pesticides that has been used around the world.

Old Post 03-14-13 10:43 #
kristus is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Joshy
Forum Regular


Posts: 964
Registered: 07-08



DoomUK said:

You're not making the reasoning behind your views particularly clear.

Do you wear a hearing aid? If yes, then science was behind that. Nature* had nothing to do with it, and it's not going to be able to repair an irreversibly damaged eardrum by itself any time soon (or whatever misfortune was behind your "disability"). While it's wonderful that something so obviously detrimental to life as deafness doesn't appear to have affected you too negatively, I could see how it's easy for people to get the impression that you're being anti-science when you pontificate the benefits of pure resolve and nature's capabilities over science's helping hand.


I didn't say anywhere that I refute science wholly, just to be clear in general. I dislike Plato but I like philosophy. If it's reasonable and the motivations are within ethical considerations, I don't see why not.

I can understand why people would be baffled when I advocate for the deaf community. I do wear hearing aids, but my reason for wanting to see the Deaf community flourish is not motivated by anti-science, but a way of accepting difference. Science can be used rather inhumanely especially when there is no consideration of the implications, such as possible diseases, pollution, etc, etc. For the Deaf, it's basically ethnicide, when people cannot see the upside in sign language and a healthy minority community that is naturally occurring, and rather them to speak and hear. Why mess with it? To satisfy the need to cure everyone, for everyone to become superbabies? It's no different to assimilating Australian Aborigines into a Western society that is completely incompatible with their beliefs. At the moment, their community is just shattered and confused.

Say hypothetically, the Deaf community doesn't exist. There would be no domain for natural language embodiment for deaf babies. No fucking way I'm learning philosophy by lip-reading, let alone babies attempting to learn through forced cultural/scientific values. To be quite frank, I wouldn't care less if my hearing aids broke. I'd still turn out the same provided I can embody a rich language naturally, and learn English alongside. When science (and/or ignorant idiots) threatens that naturally occurring cultural phenomenon, it really grates my backside. Obviously I plan on writing more about this topic as it is very relevant to a lot of issues currently around the world, but I don't think a gaming forum would be a good place for it. :P

To clarify my thoughts: GMO is definitely something quite farfetched, and we haven't exactly seen the benefits of genetically modified crops nor long term consequences (so far, it isn't sounding too good); I can't see how genetically modified babies are going to be any better. Indeed you could propose a teleological argument that we are meant to develop technology/science to bypass our disadvantage of not having teeth and claws to survive. But we've progressed far enough to be able to know when to draw the line, to start questioning what may happen in terms of ethics, to consider all variables (especially the environment) and if it is worth the investment in the long run. Who knows, GMO babies and clones could turn into zombies and threaten the existence of the human race before any meteors could have to chance to do so. :P

Old Post 03-14-13 10:52 #
Joshy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Joshy
Forum Regular


Posts: 964
Registered: 07-08



kristus said:

Dying bees aren't because of genetically modified crops. But predominantly because of the pesticides that has been used around the world.

Don't mean to be argumentative, but from what I've read around the place, it has also been said GMO is affecting bees as well, although I'm not sure if that has been properly refuted. It's hard to tell, it's all correlations from what I see.

Old Post 03-14-13 11:03 #
Joshy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3841
Registered: 04-04



Joshy said:
For the Deaf, it's basically ethnicide, when people cannot see the upside in sign language and a healthy minority community that is naturally occurring, and rather them to speak and hear. Why mess with it? To satisfy the need to cure everyone, for everyone to become superbabies?

You make a reasonable case with the language argument, but the usefulness of being able to hear isn't limited to conversation, is it? There's sensible reasons why nature at least intends us to be able to hear what's going on around us, even if it screws up on occasion. I don't recommend you take your hearing aids off and walk into a hazardous environment as an experiment, even if you can use your eyes to see what dangers are directly in front of you.

Old Post 03-14-13 11:17 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
kristus
Megablast!


Posts: 10605
Registered: 07-00



Joshy said:
Don't mean to be argumentative, but from what I've read around the place, it has also been said GMO is affecting bees as well, although I'm not sure if that has been properly refuted. It's hard to tell, it's all correlations from what I see.
Would be nice if you could be more specific of what you are talking about there as EVERYTHING we grow and eat has been genetically modified. It's really easy to do, you don't need a lab to do it. You just perform directed evolution where you choose the strands you prefer to propagate. Humans has been doing this ever since they first started farming. Even if it was unwittingly at the time they directed the evolution of their livestock and grain by picking the ones more suited for their needs.

Old Post 03-14-13 11:22 #
kristus is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Joshy
Forum Regular


Posts: 964
Registered: 07-08



DoomUK said:

You make a reasonable case with the language argument, but the usefulness of being able to hear isn't limited to conversation, is it? There's sensible reasons why nature at least intends us to be able to hear what's going on around us. I don't recommend you take your hearing aids off and walk into a hazardous environment as an experiment, even if you can use your eyes to see what dangers are directly in front of you.

I understand why you query this. Indeed, it's not just limited to conversations, although it is the main problem in our society for the time being.

I can list a few non-language things though. It's been known that deaf people are actually better drivers. We're much more visually in tune to our surroundings and notice a lot of things people seem to miss. Better yet, not everyone is deaf, so we can always take note in how people around us respond, which we can respond to easily. I could go on, these are known traits proudly embraced by the community, but I can't say it's easy to prove it scientifically! Simply put, we don't have our hearing to take for granted, so we make up for it with extra alertness and precise perceptions. It's not like we would just wander into a factory and put ourselves into grinding machineries :P. Our behaviour and survival comes with practice, proper guidance/parenting, and unrestricted usage of our bodies, to practice orientating ourselves to the world. It's like girls throwing like girls. They do that due to lack of practice; it's not a biological phenomenon. And we can't really know what nature 'intended' for us to do, guess that's why we're discussing GMO babies then. :)

Old Post 03-14-13 11:29 #
Joshy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Joshy
Forum Regular


Posts: 964
Registered: 07-08



kristus said:
Would be nice if you could be more specific of what you are talking about there as EVERYTHING we grow and eat has been genetically modified. It's really easy to do, you don't need a lab to do it. You just perform directed evolution where you choose the strands you prefer to propagate. Humans has been doing this ever since they first started farming. Even if it was unwittingly at the time they directed the evolution of their livestock and grain by picking the ones more suited for their needs.
True that, a lot of food are already GM, totally slipped my mind! I am thinking particularly the soyabeans that have been heavily modified, not the kind that involves picking out a particular strand and planting it. I think this this documentary (hoping it's the right one) that would better pinpoint my concerns.

Maybe a better example I am more familiar with would be hybrid seeds compared to organic seeds. You cannot regrow using hybrid seeds while an organic seed can continuously regrow. A seed that is modified to be infertile after one use... We don't know what happens if we keep creating hybrid seeds, nor what it does to our bodies. Not a comforting thought.

Old Post 03-14-13 11:45 #
Joshy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:50. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > First GMO babies born.

Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are OFF
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - Doomworld >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.