fraggle
Super Moderator

Posts: 4231
Registered: 07-00 |
robindegen said:
plus,.. its hard to make a wad file closed source,... impossible.
The issue isn't one of source here, it's about the freedom to copy and redistribute software. Freedoom is free for anyone to copy, download, reuse in their own projects etc.
It's really the same with software as well. The ability to see the source code isn't as important as what you're actually allowed to do with it. It's all very well being able to download the Linux source code for example, but if that source code was available under a restriction that said "you may not modify, redistribute, resell or do anything except look at this", it would lose almost all its usefulness.
In this respect, I'm almost more swayed by the Free Software Foundation's use of the name "Free Software" instead of "Open Source". The key thing here is not the ability to see the source code, but the freedoms you get from using a Free Software license.
Some companies even release source code (you can even get the Windows CE source code for download!), but if it is under a restrictive license, it may not be Free Software or Open Source.
Last edited by fraggle on 06-27-05 at 11:55
|