printz
CRAZY DUMB ZEALOT
Posts: 6129
Registered: 06-06 |
myk said:
What's with that seemingly trollish "myk is so concerned" sig, anyway? It's ironic in any case, since I'm "concerned" about the situation of a community project or with community aspects, whilst you are (apparently) concerned about my (personal) concerns. And what are you trying to say, that copyright matters and issues should be ignored?
Relax, it's not really trollish, do you think I'm such an idiot to troll my doom? It's just the fun of this phrase, extracted from someone's speech, that looks a bit odd here: myk is so concerned. Take it as an attention. What, are you offended because I noticed something? It's a joke. Do I really have to put in :) or :D? You thought it has a special meaning to attack you? Fine, fine, to stay fair, I'll add "leileilol said:". This discussion should continue via PMs, too, because it's offtopic. Just don't loser or disgrace me before doing the explanation, as you've done with others (and if you haven't, sorry), because of my acting odd.
I'm not concerned you're concerned either. I only liked how you quoted leileilol and kept that quote as a reminder. Fine, I'll add "myk quoted" for utter total convenience.
Or forget both narrations. It'll simply be appended with (it wasn't I who thought that).
Before that, myk said:
No one's talking about patents here. And "worthy enough" is not an attribute of copyright. It's not like you can say "I think this poem is lame, I don't think is merits copyright protection". It only matters whether its a written (or equivalent) part of the creative work which isn't public already in some way. So to address why it's not copyright worthy you'd have to point out how it's free to use or not part of the creative work.
I hope you know what I really mean by patents (okay, copyrights, call them what you want) and worthy enough, because I'm not 100% of the time keen on precision. Most patches, which can be negligibly considered all, are placed in the textures in a natural way, that even if we were to put them ourselves, we'd likely reach a (very) similar configuration. I hope you get what I mean. What, is there a clause forbidding playing with textures freely? Well if there is, then these copies should be burned <g>. And if it's still wrong to keep TEXTURE1 as it is, then I'll see the solution of using different patterns for skull-head-on-wood-or-brick-or-slad walls, kickable-not-pressable switches, other-way-around-overlapped-horizontal-trails-or-metal-supports, occasionally-completely-different-design. It's a bit saddening for the creator, but necessary for honour -- and clean hands.
EDIT: again you removed it. Can't you take a nonmalicious joke.
Last edited by printz on 12-06-07 at 15:09
|
12-04-07 13:01 
