TheDarkArchon
Forum Staple
Posts: 2047
Registered: 08-04 |
Ho boy, deconstruction time:
What???!!!? Doom's dead!!!!!! Since when???? I mean this is dated 11 fucking years ago and yet the reviewer claims that Doom is dead!
Compare Doom at it's peak popularity to the situation back then: Player numbers were a lot lower even back in 1997.
Uhhhhhhhh, the un-maker is very effective when used correctly, and the reviewer can blame him self if he sucks with it!
The unmaker only comes into it's own when the demon keys are found: If you don't find the demon keys, you may as well use the other cell weapons (Granted this falls under the sucks category, but for a different reason)
Is Doom 64 true 3D?!?!!
Not quite, but closer than any other Doom engine variant to that point.
Because this is Doom, if you want free look and the ability to jump then go play quake.
...I don't really need to say anything about this one, aside from Doom 64 EX. Which has both, even if the latter has to be unlocked first.
Last time i checked, Doom 64 is an "entirely new game".
Any credibility your argument had is immediately lost as anyone with this one as it is obvious the reviewer is referring to creating a new IP rather than use an old one.
I don't call there being any MODS for Doom or Doom 2 that has its own engine, or even resembles Doom 64 in any way. And besides that i though that guy called Doom "dead" earlier in the review, what does he know about community MODS?
...and you look even dumber here: Even things like Doomsday of the UAC and Aliens TC were impressive at the time, considering the era and the fact both weren't made by professionals. Also, the mod scene for Doom was big back in the day, so he would've probably known about the mod scene back in the day.
That said, the score is harsh but your counterarguments assume everyone is you, which is where everything collapses.
|
07-14-08 01:58
