Spider Mastermind
Register | User Profile | Member List | F.A.Q | Privacy Policy | New Blog | Search Forums | Forums Home
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Classic Doom > Source Ports > Doom Classic v2.0 source release watch (now released)
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »  
Author
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Yagisan
Mini-Member


Posts: 94
Registered: 01-06



Gez said:

There has been no talk about this. There was talk about not starting legal procedures. I consider that the emails Quasar sent do count as "doing something".


Please quote the sentence in it's entirety. The meaning changes considerably with selective quoting.


Yagisan said:
But really, all this talk about not doing anything to prevent a possible cancellation of a future idtech source release is immaterial to the problem at hand.


You, yourself advocate, not rocking the boat, just in case they cancel future idtech source releases.

As far as I can see, Quasar has done everything reasonable to prevent further escalation. As long as communications remain open between Quasar and Zenimax, there is no need to escalate it further up the legal process.

Finally, some food for thought on licensing:
http://www.fsf.org/news/2010-05-app-store-compliance/
http://www.fsf.org/news/blogs/licen...gpl-enforcement
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-sour...-app-store/8046

Really, the best course of action for all concerned is for Zenimax to negotiate with Quasar and the other rights holders.

Old Post 08-23-11 03:10 #
Yagisan is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Quasar
Moderator


Posts: 6092
Registered: 08-00


Just to be clear I haven't been in touch with anyone from Zenimax yet, nor is it clear that their involvement is required to resolve this issue.

Old Post 08-23-11 16:45 #
Quasar is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Gez
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 11269
Registered: 07-07


I don't think anyone from Zenimax itself is involved in this. Zenimax is neither a developer nor a publisher. It's not Zenimax that is sitting on the source code, they don't have it; it's Id. And contrarily to Doom 3 earlier, Id isn't waiting for an okay from Zenimax, since the Doom and Wolf 3D code was already open before they entered the picture. Id's mobile team isn't waiting for a greenlight from Zenimax.

Furthermore, we know that they aren't against open source: John Carmack did say that they gave the okay to open Doom 3's engine, and that a woman from the Zenimax legal department actually encouraged him to keep opening the code of older games.

Old Post 08-23-11 17:36 #
Gez is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Yagisan
Mini-Member


Posts: 94
Registered: 01-06



Quasar said:
Just to be clear I haven't been in touch with anyone from Zenimax yet, nor is it clear that their involvement is required to resolve this issue.


Gez said:
I don't think anyone from Zenimax itself is involved in this. Zenimax is neither a developer nor a publisher. It's not Zenimax that is sitting on the source code, they don't have it; it's Id.

I respectfully disagree. Id no longer exists - you are dealing with Zenimax. It's clearly listed here http://www.zenimax.com/management.htm

Gez said:
Id's mobile team isn't waiting for a greenlight from Zenimax.
No one knows what they are waiting on - my suspicions are that as there isn't a particular person responsible for ensuring that the open source license they used is being complied with, no one is in fact working on this issue.

Gez said:
Furthermore, we know that they aren't against open source: John Carmack did say that they gave the okay to open Doom 3's engine, and that a woman from the Zenimax legal department actually encouraged him to keep opening the code of older games.
Previously it benefited the shareholders to do such a thing. It built up lots of valuable, but intangible, goodwill. It has also led to this situation, where they have reused code, that was released under an open source license, code that was enhanced, cleaned up, and transformed by community members under that open source license - and they have not complied with the terms of that license.

Old Post 08-23-11 18:03 #
Yagisan is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
DaniJ
Senior Member


Posts: 2137
Registered: 08-03


With all due respect Yagisan, pulling id up on their failure to comply with the GPL license which they themselves applied to the source in question leaves somewhat of a bad taste in my mouth. I understand where you are coming from but lets not loose sight of the fact that without their releasing the source in the first place we wouldn't be in the situation at all and neither would there be source ports of any description.

Going "strong arm" over this is absolutely the right way to encourage Zenimax to decree that supporting the open source community is not in their interest.

Old Post 08-23-11 18:38 #
DaniJ is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Gez
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 11269
Registered: 07-07



Yagisan said:
I respectfully disagree. Id no longer exists - you are dealing with Zenimax. It's clearly listed here http://www.zenimax.com/management.htm

Sophistry. Id may no longer be an independent entity, but it still exists. Its staff is separate from the staff that works at Zenimax itself. Their offices are separate -- Zenimax is in Rockvill, MD; while Id is in Dallas, TX.

Unless you mean that when they bought the company, they imprisoned every member of Id Software and replaced them by demonic dopplegangers? I guess if so we'll have to find the eight scattered parts of the Staff of Chaos and defeat the evil battlemage Jagar Altman.

Zenimax itself isn't involved in this. That Id belongs to them doesn't change this simple fact.

Old Post 08-23-11 18:46 #
Gez is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Mordeth
Administrator


Posts: 1994
Registered: 05-00


OT, but when did Jim Flynn pass away? It sucks to read this; last time I heard he was doing better and recovering :/

Old Post 08-23-11 20:42 #
Mordeth is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Quasar
Moderator


Posts: 6092
Registered: 08-00



Mordeth said:
OT, but when did Jim Flynn pass away? It sucks to read this; last time I heard he was doing better and recovering :/

If that is the case then he may in fact be fine. It was the last *I* had heard that he contracted some sort of hospital infection coming off of an already serious health problem of some sort. I never heard anything more after that so I was forced to assume the worst. Lee Killough was my source for the information I knew, btw. I was asked at the time to keep it hush-hush, but I think enough time has passed now to at least be this open about it.

Old Post 08-23-11 20:59 #
Quasar is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
wesleyjohnson
Senior Member


Posts: 1038
Registered: 04-09


I almost every transaction today we deal with companies owned, partially or wholly by another, without knowing or needing to know. We can deal with Id without considering Zenimax.

Sometimes, it helps to drag the end owner into the discussion just to make them uncomfortable, because that helps to get a compromise decided. This is only needed when it is determined that someone not involved in the negotiation has control and is dragging their feet. For that reason, I think we can ignore Zenimax until such time we believe such things.

There is valid legal reason to make any transgressor aware of your position, and that silence on your part does not mean acceptance on your part, because it can be reasonably argued that such silence was interpreted as tacit acceptance. A simple statement of how you do not accept what they are doing, and that you are waiting to hear from them is enough (in my opinion), to protect your legal position.

Last edited by wesleyjohnson on 08-23-11 at 21:21

Old Post 08-23-11 21:09 #
wesleyjohnson is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Average
Member


Posts: 449
Registered: 05-11


Just thought I'd mention that both Doom and Wolf3D on the iPhone have been updated to 2.1. A few bug fixes and menu tweaks... Maybe this is part of the reason for the delay? Not much point releasing code that's defunct within a week.

PS: Gimmee the Wolf source! :P

Old Post 08-23-11 21:14 #
Average is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Quasar
Moderator


Posts: 6092
Registered: 08-00



Average said:
Just thought I'd mention that both Doom and Wolf3D on the iPhone have been updated to 2.1. A few bug fixes and menu tweaks... Maybe this is part of the reason for the delay? Not much point releasing code that's defunct within a week.

PS: Gimmee the Wolf source! :P


Quite possible, let's wait a bit and see ^_^

Old Post 08-23-11 23:58 #
Quasar is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
kmxexii
Senior Member


Posts: 1202
Registered: 06-10



Quasar said:

If that is the case then he may in fact be fine. It was the last *I* had heard that he contracted some sort of hospital infection coming off of an already serious health problem of some sort. I never heard anything more after that so I was forced to assume the worst. Lee Killough was my source for the information I knew, btw. I was asked at the time to keep it hush-hush, but I think enough time has passed now to at least be this open about it.



Not to interject into a conversation I can only observe in interest, but hearing about Flynn saddens me. I do hope the worst hasn't happened; he contributed a lot to the Doom community in its early stages and I'm really enjoying his Titan series at the moment.

Old Post 08-24-11 00:44 #
kmxexii is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Sodaholic
I feel justified yet disgusted with myself at the same time


Posts: 2901
Registered: 04-07


When did Mordeth and when did Quasar last hear about him? Whichever is more recent is probably more reliable.

Old Post 08-24-11 02:00 #
Sodaholic is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Yagisan
Mini-Member


Posts: 94
Registered: 01-06



DaniJ said:
With all due respect Yagisan, pulling id up on their failure to comply with the GPL license which they themselves applied to the source in question leaves somewhat of a bad taste in my mouth. I understand where you are coming from but lets not loose sight of the fact that without their releasing the source in the first place we wouldn't be in the situation at all and neither would there be source ports of any description.[

It way well leave a bad taste in your mouth, but with the overwhelming opinion in this thread to let one particular license violator continue to do so, just because they own some of the original copyrights, I am compelled to point out the potential ramifications of this. It visibly weakens your position against other license violators, because you can be seen to condone such violations.


DaniJ said:
Going "strong arm" over this is absolutely the right way to encourage Zenimax to decree that supporting the open source community is not in their interest.
It's no different to having any other licenser go after them, except they tend to want monetary compensation, where as we simply wish to enforce the terms.

All I can do is offer my advice in this thread - I am ( thankfully for many of you ) not a party to the legal dispute at hand. No one is forced to take my advice.

Old Post 08-24-11 02:13 #
Yagisan is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Mordeth
Administrator


Posts: 1994
Registered: 05-00



Sodaholic said:
When did Mordeth and when did Quasar last hear about him? Whichever is more recent is probably more reliable.


I initially heard about it the same way Quasar was informed, many years ago. Last mention was Lee K's blurp on a youfailit.net blog on June 12th 2008, stating

Iíve stayed somewhat in touch with Jim Flynn (Boom, Eternal TC), who is doing better now after two years of health problems.


I sure hope he's OK :/

Old Post 08-24-11 09:09 #
Mordeth is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Quasar
Moderator


Posts: 6092
Registered: 08-00



Mordeth said:


I initially heard about it the same way Quasar was informed, many years ago. Last mention was Lee K's blurp on a youfailit.net blog on June 12th 2008, stating


I sure hope he's OK :/


OK what I heard was definitely before 2008. Around 2006 would have been when Lee told me he was doing very badly. However I tried to find out how it turned out a year or so later and Lee told me he had lost touch with Jim and his caretaker at that time, and therefore didn't know how he was doing or if he had even made it through.

If he IS in good health, he's still getting up there in years. He was in his 60's back when they were working on BOOM and I don't think a lot of people realized he was that old ;) I certainly didn't know myself until I read some of his biographic material on his webpage (he was doing hardcore ASM coding on the old "core memory" machines before any of us - or some of our parents even - were thought of).

Either way, here's one for you Jim. BOOM wouldn't have been possible without you.

Old Post 08-24-11 16:42 #
Quasar is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
kmxexii
Senior Member


Posts: 1202
Registered: 06-10



Quasar said:
If he IS in good health, he's still getting up there in years. He was in his 60's back when they were working on BOOM and I don't think a lot of people realized he was that old ;) I certainly didn't know myself until I read some of his biographic material on his webpage (he was doing hardcore ASM coding on the old "core memory" machines before any of us - or some of our parents even - were thought of).

Either way, here's one for you Jim. BOOM wouldn't have been possible without you.



Oh, wow! That's something I never would have guessed.

Old Post 08-24-11 16:59 #
kmxexii is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Quasar
Moderator


Posts: 6092
Registered: 08-00


It appears that the Doom Classic v2.1 source has been uploaded:

http://download.zenimax.com/idsoftw...ios_v21_src.zip

Carmack didn't actually let me know it had been uploaded, I just decided to check myself.

Old Post 09-05-11 20:07 #
Quasar is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
RjY
anARCHy


Posts: 969
Registered: 05-02


Oh, good. I'll remove the barometer from the teacup ;-)

Thanks to Quasar for making polite enquiries and to everyone else for being patient and not thoroughly overreacting and getting lawyers involved.

Old Post 09-05-11 23:13 #
RjY is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Blzut3
Member


Posts: 520
Registered: 06-04


iPhone Wolfenstein source is available as well. Shame it's now on a site that doesn't have an index though.

Old Post 09-05-11 23:37 #
Blzut3 is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Dark Yoda
Warming Up


Posts: 13
Registered: 01-10



Quasar said:
Carmack didn't actually let me know it had been uploaded, I just decided to check myself.


Oh, John forgot to mail you. Bad, bad Carmack no cookies for you! Are you serious?

Old Post 09-06-11 07:02 #
Dark Yoda is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
entryway
Forum Staple


Posts: 2733
Registered: 01-04


:)

http://prboom-plus.sf.net/clip/2011-09-06_11.40.35.png

Most changes since 1.0 look so :)
- Created by John Carmack on 4/13/09.
- Copyright 2009 idSoftware. All rights reserved.
+ Copyright (C) 2009-2011 id Software LLC, a ZeniMax Media company.

Last edited by entryway on 09-06-11 at 10:02

Old Post 09-06-11 09:39 #
entryway is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
chungy
Senior Member


Posts: 1896
Registered: 06-05


If anyone's actually interested in a full diff here it is: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13513277/do...1.0_2.1.diff.gz
(it is big)

Old Post 09-06-11 11:11 #
chungy is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Mr. T
Senior Member


Posts: 1486
Registered: 12-03


They need to hurry up and release Doom2, or give us the promised wad-loading feature ><

Old Post 09-06-11 11:13 #
Mr. T is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
DaniJ
Senior Member


Posts: 2137
Registered: 08-03


Great news about the source release. I've now got something interesting to read over the weekend :)

Old Post 09-06-11 11:29 #
DaniJ is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
cybdmn
Junior Member


Posts: 226
Registered: 06-09


There other stuff missing by far longer. The source for the iPhone port of Hacx is still missing.

http://hacx.generalarcade.com/

The source link lead into 404 since the start of the site.

Old Post 09-06-11 11:57 #
cybdmn is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
DaniJ
Senior Member


Posts: 2137
Registered: 08-03


You'd have to speak to the developers or contact@generalarcade.com about iPhone Hacx.

Old Post 09-06-11 11:59 #
DaniJ is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
GreebCables
Warming Up


Posts: 13
Registered: 09-11



cybdmn said:
There other stuff missing by far longer. The source for the iPhone port of Hacx is still missing.

http://hacx.generalarcade.com/

The source link lead into 404 since the start of the site.



Also, the game "Bastards" seems to be in GPL violation. Check out the bottom of this page

http://www.boxmedia.ro/bastards/

They are clearly simply linking to the original iPhone doom source (http://www.boxmedia.ro/bastards/doo...v1.0_source.zip) rather than making the derivative source code available. Hmm...

Old Post 09-06-11 12:04 #
GreebCables is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Mr. T
Senior Member


Posts: 1486
Registered: 12-03


I wouldn't jump to conclusions. Maybe they didn't even change the source code.

Old Post 09-06-11 13:25 #
Mr. T is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
GreebCables
Warming Up


Posts: 13
Registered: 09-11


Considering the zip file is named exactly the same and the provisioning profile in the project is still set to "John Carmack", it's a conclusion I'm willing to jump to.

Old Post 09-06-11 13:45 #
GreebCables is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »  
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Classic Doom > Source Ports > Doom Classic v2.0 source release watch (now released)

Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are OFF
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - Doomworld >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.