Doom monster
User Profile | Member List | F.A.Q | Privacy Policy | New Blog | Search Forums | Forums Home
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Classic Doom > Source Ports > decent computer to run todays' source ports?
 
Author
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:16. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
invictius
Forum Regular


Posts: 770
Registered: 03-06


I have a corei7 system and an aging dual core with a cheapo ati radeon (barely better than integrated graphics) that I end up using most of the time for zdoom and risen3d, which runs both really well, despite the fact that it's not set up to be a gaming rig. It's only when 3d models and high-res textures come into the story that I start to see slowdowns. Now I know that something like nuts.wad with 3d models would not run even on the fastest computer in the world, but what is a ballpark figure for what kind of system you really need when using textures and models? The risen3d page isn't all that helpful, just says you should have over 256mb video ram for textures and models.

Old Post Jul 26 2012 17:12 #
invictius is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
NiuHaka
Member


Posts: 593
Registered: 06-10


It seems to me that all you need to upgrade is your video card. BUT I always love building new rigs. If that is what you are looking to do just stick with i7 and the rest should be pretty simple.

Old Post Jul 26 2012 17:27 #
NiuHaka is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Maes
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 13756
Registered: 07-06


The CPU is the dominant factor in most ports, as the rendering is only half the work, actually, so you should be fine. Now, if you crank the effects to eleven and play nuts.wad with light source fireballs or some GZDoom specific mod with tons of effects....then a fast video card would help, too. Otherwise, you'll mostly do just fine.

Old Post Jul 26 2012 17:35 #
Maes is online now || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Gez
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 12468
Registered: 07-07


If you want to use an OpenGL renderer, try to get an Nvidia rather than an ATI (or worse, Intel) since the guys who write ATI drivers tends to neglect the OpenGL side of things.

Old Post Jul 26 2012 18:56 #
Gez is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
DaniJ
Senior Member


Posts: 2298
Registered: 08-03


...and consequently, most developers working on hardware rendered source ports choose NVidia for their dev systems.

Old Post Jul 26 2012 19:04 #
DaniJ is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
_bruce_
Senior Member


Posts: 1347
Registered: 11-07


1 Ghz cpu should be enough.

Old Post Jul 26 2012 19:25 #
_bruce_ is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
GhostlyDeath
Forum Retard


Posts: 1041
Registered: 08-05



Gez said:
If you want to use an OpenGL renderer, try to get an Nvidia rather than an ATI (or worse, Intel) since the guys who write ATI drivers tends to neglect the OpenGL side of things.

Or you can use the open source Gallium3D ATI drivers on Linux and Windows.

DaniJ said:
...and consequently, most developers working on hardware rendered source ports choose NVidia for their dev systems.

When I start doing any OpenGL work, all my systems run either ATI or integrated Intel chips.

Old Post Jul 27 2012 12:50 #
GhostlyDeath is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Maes
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 13756
Registered: 07-06



GhostlyDeath said:
When I start doing any OpenGL work, all my systems run either ATI or integrated Intel chips.

INFIDEL!!!

Old Post Jul 27 2012 15:37 #
Maes is online now || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
printz
CRAZY DUMB ZEALOT


Posts: 9195
Registered: 06-06



Gez said:
since the guys who write ATI drivers tends to neglect the OpenGL side of things.

What a dick move.

__________________
Automatic Wolfenstein - Version 1.0.1 - also on Android (Updated 28/03/2015)

Old Post Jul 27 2012 16:23 #
printz is offline Twitter account Youtube Github || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Porsche Monty
Member


Posts: 454
Registered: 06-10



_bruce_ said:
1 Ghz cpu should be enough.

You'd be surprised how much 1ghz would limit your Dooming on modern software-based engines these days, mostly if we're talking massive, high-detail, FX-ridden user maps.

There's a lot more going on than just graphics, and the CPU has to cope with it all.

Not long ago I started using "use_libsamplerate 5" with Chocolate Doom, which adds like 15 extra seconds to the startup process for doom2.wad alone, and that's on a P4 3.8ghz. You do the math.

__________________
Pirates are nothing but trash. Be a good citizen and support SOPA/PIPA.

Old Post Jul 29 2012 18:58 #
Porsche Monty is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:16. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
 
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Classic Doom > Source Ports > decent computer to run todays' source ports?

Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are OFF
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - Doomworld >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.