Baron of Hell
User Profile | Member List | F.A.Q | Privacy Policy | New Blog | Search Forums | Forums Home
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Classic Doom > Source Ports > Fragkit - not worth to care about
 
Author
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:29. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
XCOPY
Member


Posts: 260
Registered: 12-12


Last edited by XCOPY on Jul 3 2015 at 00:26

Old Post Jan 18 2014 04:21 #
XCOPY is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Zed
Senior Member


Posts: 1135
Registered: 10-11



XCOPY said:
The main reason for the existance of this package, is to minimalize this whole source-port fanatism that, in my eyes, hurts the Doom community, also it makes things easier for newbies and possibly veterans. I added Freedoom's IWADs in the package so newcomers wouldn't simply be getting an empty package with an engine only and hopefully that will rise Freedoom's interest, attracting some contributors. I plan to add other free IWADs in this package, like HACX, Megaman 8-bit Deathmatch, Action Doom 2 and others. Enough talk:

>> DOWNLOAD

Let me see if I understand this correctly. You are distributing some Doom utilities (focusing mainly on multiplayer), like some sort of shovelware compilation? Also, I don't understand how can this stop "source-port fanatism", specially given that you limit the compilation to just three ports.*

On a positive criticism, I like the fact that you're including Freedoom. It seriously needs more exposure.

Also, why not include some level/wad editors?

EDIT: * Now that I think about it, since you see to be focusing on multiplayer, it seems logical.

Old Post Jan 18 2014 05:43 #
Zed is online now || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
XCOPY
Member


Posts: 260
Registered: 12-12


Last edited by XCOPY on Jul 3 2015 at 00:26

Old Post Jan 18 2014 07:03 #
XCOPY is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Xaser
Forum Staple


Posts: 2839
Registered: 07-03


The name "IDTech" is kinda taken. By id themselves, no less. :P

Old Post Jan 18 2014 07:37 #
Xaser is offline Twitter account || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
XCOPY
Member


Posts: 260
Registered: 12-12


Last edited by XCOPY on Jul 3 2015 at 00:28

Old Post Jan 18 2014 08:31 #
XCOPY is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
GreyGhost
I have a custom title now!


Posts: 9268
Registered: 01-08



XCOPY said:
I'm concerned about Doom Builder 2's variants, since it requires .net framework 3.5 to run on a XP machine, and that's some huge download.

It's around 250MB, which is large but hardly huge.

Old Post Jan 18 2014 10:15 #
GreyGhost is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Gez
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 12392
Registered: 07-07


250 MB is huge when the rest of the package is less than 1/10th of that.

Old Post Jan 18 2014 10:52 #
Gez is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
GreyGhost
I have a custom title now!


Posts: 9268
Registered: 01-08


So it is, and Win7 users are bound to complain about the bloat.

Old Post Jan 18 2014 12:22 #
GreyGhost is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
purist
Senior Member


Posts: 2348
Registered: 04-04


How about naming it Fragkit since it's a kit to facilitate multiplayer?

Old Post Jan 18 2014 12:58 #
purist is online now || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Jayextee
Darth Jrrr


Posts: 1250
Registered: 10-00


Naming it 'IDTech' is one hell of a misnomer -- sounds like it should be an all-in-one pack to get people started in making content with the engine. Worse still, the lack of a number to designate it as idTech 1 (which is, the Doom engine) could confuse people who just wandered in and downloaded it, possibly expecting the Rage engine or something.

Echoing Purist's suggestion.

Old Post Jan 18 2014 13:17 #
Jayextee is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
XCOPY
Member


Posts: 260
Registered: 12-12


Last edited by XCOPY on Jul 3 2015 at 00:34

Old Post Jan 18 2014 16:33 #
XCOPY is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Gez
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 12392
Registered: 07-07


Nope. They weren't numbered back then. It's while building hype for Rage that they used numbers, saying it would use the id Tech 5 engine. Retroactively, they applied id Tech 4 to the Doom 3 engine, id Tech 3 to the Quake III engine, and id Tech 2 to the Quake II engine.

There is no official "id Tech 1", but by their logic, it'd be the Quake engine. Doom engine is id Tech 0, and Wolf 3D engine is id Tech -1. :p

Old Post Jan 18 2014 20:48 #
Gez is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Quasar
Moderator


Posts: 6453
Registered: 08-00



Gez said:
Nope. They weren't numbered back then. It's while building hype for Rage that they used numbers, saying it would use the id Tech 5 engine. Retroactively, they applied id Tech 4 to the Doom 3 engine, id Tech 3 to the Quake III engine, and id Tech 2 to the Quake II engine.

There is no official "id Tech 1", but by their logic, it'd be the Quake engine. Doom engine is id Tech 0, and Wolf 3D engine is id Tech -1. :p

There was a page on id's website which referred to Quake engine licensees in the list of id Tech 2, indicating that the Quake 2 engine is NOT considered an id Tech iteration, because it is only an incremental improvement and architectural evolution of the same technology base. In particular, Hexen II was referred to as an id Tech 2 game, and is as Quake-1-engine as you can get.

Doom is id Tech 1.

Old Post Jan 20 2014 06:43 #
Quasar is offline Twitter account Youtube Github || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
Blzut3
Member


Posts: 568
Registered: 06-04



Quasar said:
There was a page on id's website which referred to Quake engine licensees in the list of id Tech 2

To provide a link. I suppose the last line should be most convincing:

then download the packages from the QUAKE and QUAKE II sections of our technology downloads page.

Old Post Jan 20 2014 07:06 #
Blzut3 is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
wesleyjohnson
Senior Member


Posts: 1122
Registered: 04-09


250 MB is a large download even for a trip to the library to use their faster connection (150 KB /sec). And it duplicates programs that I already have.

Old Post Jan 21 2014 19:44 #
wesleyjohnson is offline || Blog || PM || Post History || Add Buddy IP || Edit || Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:29. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
 
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Classic Doom > Source Ports > Fragkit - not worth to care about

Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are OFF
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - Doomworld >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.