---

Alwaysdoomed said:
Those are actually really impressive, though please make the monsters look more sinister and evil. And what impboy4 said is true, if you're going to remake doom then make sure your models look different from the sprites and dont make the maps like exactly like the originals.

Other than what impboy4 said i think you should continue this project because it looks very promising.

I look forward to seeing how the arachnotron and spidermastermind turn out.

---

---

Impboy4 said:


Um, making the models different from the sprites but still act like the monsters is still illegal.

---

---

Impboy4 said:


Um, making the models different from the sprites but still act like the monsters is still illegal.

---

---

Impboy4 said:
I hate to break it to you, but you're going to get a cease and desist letter from id Software if you continue this. Just warning you.

---

---

Memfis said:

Why? How is this different from hires texture packs, 3d models for jDoom, etc? Or are these illegal too?

---

---

bcwood16 said:
As for that floor, looks great, but I noticed its a actual detailed model.

---

---

GooberMan said:

As your your comment, I noticed it's quite uninformed and shows a lack of understanding of both Unity's heirarchy browser and geometry shaders.

---

---

GooberMan said:

As your your comment, I noticed it's quite uninformed and shows a lack of understanding of both Unity's heirarchy browser and geometry shaders.

---

---

Sahkan said:
therefore this is more efficient to use a low poly model with texture and bump map on it.

---

---

Memfis said:

Why? How is this different from hires texture packs, 3d models for jDoom, etc? Or are these illegal too?

---

---

Impboy4 said:
That's different. Those still require the original game to use. I'm talking about something that could happen to this project like this one.

---

---

GooberMan said:

Nope. Because if you're making a Doom remake, you want to apply that material to arbitrary surfaces. And to do that, you're going to have to instance render each mesh instance if you want any reasonable performance out of it, and then you'll have problems with overlapping walls etc.

Compared to, say, LOD'ing your geometry shader, making models out of all your textures is the long and convoluted way to do it. It's also scalable - you can use a parallax shader for slower machines, and a tesselation shader for faster machines if you just make it a material.

---

---

Sahkan said:
My doom remake project !
I did put it originaly on fan pics forum but this is more belong in here .

---

---

kristus said:

No it doesn't. It's not a Classic Doom mod. It's not even using any form of the various Doom engines. If anything it belongs where you first put it. Because it is a fan creation. Optionally, in the Everything else forum.

---

---

Reinchard666 said:
Don't worry about him and keep up the good work. Too shame that some people can't appreciate your hard work and just complain.

---

---

Memfis said:

I see... Then how about a game that doesn't use Doom's resources but still requires doom(2).wad to run (via hash check or something), would that work?

---

---

PRIMEVAL said:
The model looks cool, though the movement is odd. Left a comment on your vid. Texture looks neat. If things look well, I can possibly help in remaking the music for you. Good luck!

---

---

Sahkan said:
The new floor with a parralex shader instead a model .
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/...loorprallex.jpg
so this is like 8 triangles vs 296~ triangles for each tile .
I baked the normal map and the height map from the model i made before, so in order for it to look good i guess i will have to model each texture .
Please comment and let me know what you think and feel free to give me new ideas, Thanks .

---