Masacre 2

Reviewer #1: Why don't you just stick with Halo if you don't like 'drab'! Reviewer #2: I agree. Reviewer #3: I disagree. In the 90's, wad builders were at least trying their best to create decent wads, albeit some were not good. These days we have a hoard of imbeciles throwing their excrement at us in torrents. This is a good wad with great battles and a decent layout, and for a 'drab' level has some nice architecture. I for one liked it. 4/5

I had fun playing through this. It's relatively challenging because health tends to be scarce, although it did not seem too tough because I made it to the exit on the third try (from scratch). My health was low for long periods, though. The various doors make arch-viles more dangerous because ghost monsters are likely (I was careful and only got 1 imp when I did have rockets). I also liked the simplistic urban architecture. [4/5] ~Chain Mail (9/2008)

Meh it was a bit dull due to the switch hunting.

Meh. It's ok. It's a boring map. It's nothing special.

I love everyone at doomworld. 5/5 easily.

Wow, I really enjoyed it! Challenging, great fights, midschool style, nice places and crates. I love crates!!! 5/5 - Optimus

Great wad.

Not a bad slaughter map, even if it's far from the best.

Naaa, a bit too hard for my taste (even on lower settings), but it is from 1995, so: 3/5

This is dated November 2002. It's s dull warehouse level, where you basically just fight large groups of weak monsters in a series of square rooms. There's a bit of switchhunting and backtracking. The level has a lot of action, and on that level it works, but it just feels like a chore to play through, because it's so monotonous. And drab, too, it looks like something from 1995

PATHETIC

Pretty good, well-choreographed action in a non-monotonous environment. And let's remember that some of the best Doom wads were made in 1995.