AOL Girls Museum

29/M/CAN

This level gave me a mid-life crisis.

This is dated March 1997. It's a wood-panelled museum with some crude, angular architecture. The women are pretty rough-looking "reader's wives" amateurs. There is no nudity. There's an advert for card-net.com, which is long dead. The map is large but very simple; just a bunch of corridors with poor-quality pictures. The baddies are a mixture of imps and former humans, with a mancubus as the "boss".

Very hot!!!

Basically pics of women in thier underwear idgames needs something like post hell (call it wad hell) for shit like this to go.

TERRIBLE architecture.
TERRIBLE gameplay.
TERRIBLE balance.
NO originality.

Funny level with lots of provocative women... But nothing more.

picante,pero aburrifo a la larga.

I thought AOL Girls were all balding men pretending to be 16/F/NYC? Anyway...just another standard WAD from the Clinton era. I give it one star for the apparently deliberate HOM effect in one of the halls - well played! Another star is added for the pinup art. But at day's end, it's Just Another WAD. No further stars are warranted.

shouldn't something like this be in x rated

C'mon, it's not that bad. And it's not in x-rated because there's no nude pics included. -- 3/5

Uh...wasn't there a gay-themed wad with a very similar premise?