Kid Airbag Posted April 6, 2002 Heh, I think Lüt's embezzling money :P 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted April 6, 2002 Archvile64 said:Heh, I think Lüt's embezzling money :P The forums should have postcount taxes implemented. 100 per week should be fine for most regulars. I'd collect most of those, naturally. But with 7 mods/admins it's easy to split up 50 or 100 posts between us. It could promote spamming, but it'd be reserved for senior members. Of course there should be a registration tax, so everybody would start with -100, and once they get to 0 they can start paying taxes. Or, 1 I suppose. Negative numbers would = "in debt" instead of "on probation". Great idea, huh? 0 Share this post Link to post
Naked Snake Posted April 6, 2002 Lüt said:The forums should have postcount taxes implemented. 100 per week should be fine for most regulars. I'd collect most of those, naturally. But with 7 mods/admins it's easy to split up 50 or 100 posts between us. It could promote spamming, but it'd be reserved for senior members. Of course there should be a registration tax, so everybody would start with -100, and once they get to 0 they can start paying taxes. Or, 1 I suppose. Negative numbers would = "in debt" instead of "on probation". Great idea, huh? That sounds like a good idea (No) 0 Share this post Link to post
Kid Airbag Posted April 6, 2002 Sounds good, except maybe it should be done like a set percentage of posts in a week. Like 50%, so if you do make 100 in a week, 50 will be taken away, instead of just 100 flat per week. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted April 6, 2002 Archvile64 said:maybe it should be done like a set percentage of posts in a week.I suppose that could work, but we'd have to round the total up to something divisible by the number of mods who would claim profit. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kid Airbag Posted April 6, 2002 Well, with seven mods, 49% would work. Each of you would get seven percent. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted April 6, 2002 Archvile64 said:Each of you would get seven percent. No, I meant the number of posts taken. 7% could still turn out to be something like 23 posts, in which case we'd have to round up to 28. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted April 6, 2002 How would we divide 24 evenly amongst 7 people? 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted April 6, 2002 Bah, you're just bitter because I'm back in full swing now. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kid Airbag Posted April 7, 2002 Lüt said:How would we divide 24 evenly amongst 7 people? 21, you frad :P It's closer to 23 than 28 is. 0 Share this post Link to post
TheHighestTree Posted April 7, 2002 i personally have no idea what any of you are talking about 0 Share this post Link to post
TheHighestTree Posted April 7, 2002 BTW, when am i gonna be able to use my Atrocity guy as an avatar? 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted April 7, 2002 Archvile64 said:21, you frad :PNo, that would require rounding down. People shouldn't be allowed to cheat the tax system like that. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kid Airbag Posted April 8, 2002 Lüt said:No, that would require rounding down. People shouldn't be allowed to cheat the tax system like that. I said round to the nearest. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted April 8, 2002 Archvile64 said:I said round to the nearest. Right, which is cheating us out of our rightful dues. 0 Share this post Link to post