Reisal Posted August 25, 2013 Starting in his own state. This even applies to straight couples too. What a fucking idiot. I'm sorry Mr. Ken, you ain't telling me who I should fuck and how. Fuck off. 0 Share this post Link to post
GreyGhost Posted August 25, 2013 Probably just bitter and twisted because he isn't getting any, so why should anyone else have fun. 0 Share this post Link to post
Technician Posted August 25, 2013 Ha ha! Silly Iran-- hey wait a minute! 0 Share this post Link to post
Joshy Posted August 25, 2013 Looks like a thinly disguised attempt to abolish homosexuality. Seriously, are American politicians that stupid? I thought Australian politicians were bad enough.. (when I say politicians, I'm talking about the bottom of the barrel kind of politicians) 0 Share this post Link to post
Memfis Posted August 25, 2013 Stop stealing ideas from the Russian government. 0 Share this post Link to post
Nomad Posted August 25, 2013 Not constitutional. Even if it passes, it'll be stricken down by the supreme court eventually. 0 Share this post Link to post
Technician Posted August 25, 2013 Joshy said:Looks like a thinly disguised attempt to abolish homosexuality.If so, they behind on the times. I'd assume anal is more popular among heteros than homos by sheer numbers. We live in liberated times. 0 Share this post Link to post
Joshua Schäferhund Posted August 25, 2013 ZOE MAH GAWD, ANYTHIN DAT AINT VAGINUL INTERKOURS IZ DIZGUZZTIN AN UNNATTRUL Fucking stupid homophobic right wing bastard... >:/ 0 Share this post Link to post
40oz Posted August 25, 2013 What are you gonna do? put the prisoners in jail? 0 Share this post Link to post
Joshy Posted August 25, 2013 Technician said:If so, they behind on the times. I'd assume anal is more popular among heteros than homos by sheer numbers. We live in liberated times. Well, I'd agree with the 'behind on the times sentiment' but from such a religious perspective (wiki says Roman Catholic), their perception of homosexuality is merely focalised on the sex act per se, and I also wouldn't be surprised he'd want to reduce heterosexual sexual acts to vaginal sex purely for procreation. He must be thinking 'two birds, one stone' (or a flock of birds, one gatling gun, heh) 0 Share this post Link to post
Jodwin Posted August 25, 2013 Mr. Chris said:Starting in his own state. This even applies to straight couples too. What a fucking idiot. I'm sorry Mr. Ken, you ain't telling me who I should fuck and how. Fuck off. You're more concerned about your dick than the proposition that kids in Utah wouldn't have compulsory education? Whatever. 0 Share this post Link to post
Aliotroph? Posted August 25, 2013 Funny how the country that put men on the moon also regularly produces this kind of crap. It takes a special kind of idiocy to produce laws like this. 0 Share this post Link to post
MFG38 Posted August 25, 2013 What in the name of the Cyberdemon Lord is this nonsense? 0 Share this post Link to post
geekmarine Posted August 25, 2013 How does such a person even get elected to office? I fucking love oral sex, and I'm completely hetero. I don't even know how to respond to this. Dude doesn't like going down on his lady-friend? Doesn't like getting a blowjob? I feel like I'm being a bigot even mentioning my sexuality, but come on - this isn't even about sexual preferences, dude is just like, "Enjoying sex is a crime." Who can support that? 0 Share this post Link to post
Avoozl Posted August 25, 2013 geekmarine said:"Enjoying sex is a crime."I don't think his idea is that enjoying sex is a crime, it's more like he thinks having sex in ways other than the "default" way is a crime. But obviously it's stupid regardless, people should be allowed to do it the way they want to. 0 Share this post Link to post
Jodwin Posted August 25, 2013 Avoozl said:I don't think his idea is that enjoying sex is a crime, it's more like he thinks having sex in ways other than the "default" way is a crime. 0 Share this post Link to post
Technician Posted August 25, 2013 geekmarine said:I feel like I'm being a bigot even mentioning my sexuality, but come onHetero guilt? 0 Share this post Link to post
CorSair Posted August 25, 2013 I really doubt that's gonna get any wind to become real legislation. Unless they have means to install cameras and have persons to check every bedroom least daily basis. Oh, and folks, this is the best you can vote in your country, no refunds. 0 Share this post Link to post
NuMetalManiak Posted August 25, 2013 CorSair said:Oh, and folks, this is the best you can vote in your country, no refunds. Or state, for that matter. I don't like either candidate for governor here in VA, but it looks like the Reps are taking it wayyy too far now. 0 Share this post Link to post
AndrewB Posted August 25, 2013 I thought the supreme court closed this issue 10 years ago. 0 Share this post Link to post
baronofheck82 Posted August 25, 2013 Doesn't matter if it passes or not, people are gonna keep doing it anyway. 0 Share this post Link to post
Da Werecat Posted August 25, 2013 baronofheck82 said:Doesn't matter if it passes or not, people are gonna keep doing it anyway. 0 Share this post Link to post
Maes Posted August 26, 2013 Jodwin said:Every Sperm Is Sacred More like Every Anatomically Correct Figurine Is Sacred, for you :-p 0 Share this post Link to post
SYS Posted August 26, 2013 Methinks he's another Republican closet case. Without the most absurd amount of surveillance, how do they expect to enforce this law on anyone that isn't performing that sort of fucking in public? 0 Share this post Link to post
Quasar Posted August 26, 2013 CorSair said:I really doubt that's gonna get any wind to become real legislation. Unless they have means to install cameras and have persons to check every bedroom least daily basis... 0 Share this post Link to post
Kontra Kommando Posted August 26, 2013 I guess these are the conservatives Rush wants in the GOP. 0 Share this post Link to post
DooM_RO Posted August 26, 2013 @Quasar "I'm afraid I can't let you do that, Dave." 0 Share this post Link to post
Maes Posted August 26, 2013 SYS said:Methinks he's another Republican closet case. Without the most absurd amount of surveillance, how do they expect to enforce this law on anyone that isn't performing that sort of fucking in public? If they really wanted to enable this sort of capillary surveillance, people have been willingly installing webcams and microphones on their PCs for nearly two decades now. Most people own a cell phone (which unlike a hook phone, CAN be remotely activated, if need be). Plus there are all those smartphones with cameras, mikes and GPS...are you 100% certain that those are really off when you think they are off (other than the obvious "pulling the plug" scenario)? http://news.cnet.com/2100-1029-6140191.html http://earthfirstnews.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/fbi-can-remotely-activate-cell-phones-laptop-microphones-and-more/ The only reason they cannot -yet- enable a 1984-like scenario, is that there's no political will or need to do so, plus some technical problems like e.g. actually interpreting ALL those intercepted calls, messages etc., most of which will be useless and trivial chatter, anyway. In East Germany phone line applications were delayed mainly because each phone line had to have its 24/7 dedicated human eavesdropper. But in any case, that would be like trying to find out terrorists by filtering google searches for military lingo and jargon: too many COD and CS script kiddiez by now make it impossible to spot the real deal. Also, hundreds of amateur porn websites, with clips shot God-knows-where and showing things God-would-rather-not-know. Where to start censorship? So, if clip #1 shows anal nigga gangbang but is shot in the nearby state it's A-OK but clip #2 which has the same style of anal nigga gangbang which is shot in your bible belt backwater is not? Yeah, right. 0 Share this post Link to post
Philnemba Posted August 28, 2013 Ken Cuccinelli is a fucking derp if he thinks that shit will happen. 0 Share this post Link to post