Xyzzу Posted December 5, 2017 Ah I see, the same thing can be observed in my map. If you use the yellow door from the start, it won't display the "You need the yellow key to open this door" message because there is a linedef special right in front of it. 0 Share this post Link to post
NeedHealth Posted December 6, 2017 The safe distance is 16 map units between two lindefs or you might get undefined behaviour. 0 Share this post Link to post
Big Ol Billy Posted December 9, 2017 Exhitionism v4 Ok, I think I've fixed the issue. Caught some other stuff, mostly visual, as well. Thanks for testing and continuing to move things along @Phade102, sorry I overlooked this. This map has been so finicky, but I was just starting to explore "advanced" Boom techniques back when I made it, so whaddaya gonna do... Original post on page 6 has been updated as well. 0 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted December 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Big Ol Billy said: Exhitionism v4 Ok, I think I've fixed the issue. Caught some other stuff, mostly visual, as well. Thanks for testing and continuing to move things along @Phade102, sorry I overlooked this. This map has been so finicky, but I was just starting to explore "advanced" Boom techniques back when I made it, so whaddaya gonna do... Original post on page 6 has been updated as well. Its no problem Billy, thank you for fixing it as quick as you have. I'm having help from other people on the project right now as i'm a bit busy, it should be out later this month! 1 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted December 15, 2017 Updated main thread with final list of maps and corresponding authors. 1 Share this post Link to post
floatRand Posted December 15, 2017 (edited) Perhaps I should figure a better name for my map, though. "Going Up", "Love in Elevator", "Central Elevator Shaft" or "Destination Dispatch". Or something. No idea. I am bad at naming. By the way, has anyone tried it out yet? 1 Share this post Link to post
R1ck Posted December 30, 2017 I'M ON THE MAP01? I CAN'T TELL HOW HONORED AM I. on serious note, I'm looking forward to play these maps :D 1 Share this post Link to post
rehelekretep Posted December 30, 2017 On 15/12/2017 at 9:03 PM, floatRand said: Perhaps I should figure a better name for my map, though. "Going Up", "Love in Elevator", "Central Elevator Shaft" or "Destination Dispatch". Or something. No idea. I am bad at naming. By the way, has anyone tried it out yet? Shafted Up The Shaft Shaft Love Destination: Shaft ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 4 Share this post Link to post
Dragonfly Posted December 30, 2017 On 15/12/2017 at 9:03 PM, floatRand said: By the way, has anyone tried it out yet? Sorry, totally forgot to reply to this. I did! It's honestly one of my favourites in the pack, complete with a really fun to find secret exit! :D I did feel the midi was out of place, but that's a personal-taste thing. 0 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted December 31, 2017 22 hours ago, R1ck said: I'M ON THE MAP01? I CAN'T TELL HOW HONORED AM I. on serious note, I'm looking forward to play these maps :D Haha, your map was the easiest by far, but still quality. There were only two maps removed and they were both SArais's 0 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted January 2, 2018 I apologise for the delay in the map launch! The wad was uploaded to /idgames today, but of course, being a first time uploader I didnt realize it would take a few days for it to upload! It will be up very soon, and I will post the link in the original post when that happens. 2 Share this post Link to post
floatRand Posted January 2, 2018 You could give non-idgames mirror meanwhile. 0 Share this post Link to post
Misty Posted January 2, 2018 Or doomshack link,which is permament in case if it's gets rejected. 0 Share this post Link to post
riderr3 Posted January 2, 2018 I'm glad this project is finally released. It's like a relief after constipation. 0 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted January 3, 2018 I will be providing a temporary link later today. I want people to enjoy the project as soon as possible. 2 Share this post Link to post
cacomeme Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) Excited to finally play this! Hope you get a link up soon bud :) Edited January 3, 2018 by cacomeme 0 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted January 4, 2018 I am so sorry there isnt a link yet! The project is 100% done and ready to go, the IDGames link just hasn't come though yet and I'm going to be uploading it later today! I am So sorry to everyone for the delay! 1 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted January 4, 2018 Updated the original post with a temporary download link. Will be changed to the /idgames link once its avaliable. I hope everyone enjoys, please post feedback! 0 Share this post Link to post
Bauul Posted January 4, 2018 Congratulations on the release guys! I look forward to trying this out! 1 Share this post Link to post
SGS Man Posted January 4, 2018 Congratulations on the release! It was an honor working with you folks. 1 Share this post Link to post
Misty Posted January 4, 2018 Why cc4-tex isn't merged with compilation?I just read text file and tested wad. I believe that final stuff must be merged with all texture sets in one with maintenance afterwards, because not everyone will read text file and be sure that they loaded that texture pack. Sorry for being nitpicky. 1 Share this post Link to post
Dragonfly Posted January 4, 2018 I completely disagree. Why merge a texture pack into the project when it's one that a large quantity of doomers already have on their harddrive? I agree that an 'alternate merged version' could be an option but it's not uncommon for projects that make use of a single texture pack (especially CC4) to simply say 'requires xxxxxxxx.wad'. :) 0 Share this post Link to post
Misty Posted January 4, 2018 (edited) For outsiders mostly. Because beyond of this forum there are lots of people who play custom doom content and they won't search cc4-tex to play this wad and for those who doesn't do maps, this pack would be waste of space after they done with this community compilation. 1 Share this post Link to post
grrfield Posted January 4, 2018 (edited) I'd like to see it merged too. When i test a file before i host a wad, i just fire it up and discard it if it does not work "out of the box". Why? Because there can be so many reasons why it does not work: - it is not intended for the source port i always use (which is zandronum - and this forum is not entirely dedicated to zandronum) - it may not be compatible with the mods i constantly use - it may be just, well, .... not so very well made so it just breaks... - it uses some obscure other features that i'm not aware of - it may require other files that i overlooked in the first place...(which is the case we are dealing with here). When i play on other servers it won't normally pose a big problem, since cc-tex will be dl'd automatically (if for some obscure reason you don't already have it on your harddrive somewhere), but in setting up a server myself i select wads on there "availability to use out of the box". I am sure many people think like me when they fire up a server on TSPG or whatever other platform. Call it laziness, but it is what it is.... Don't break the great work you did in making this stuff and just merge all necessary things into the wad. It'll guarantee more success 0 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted January 4, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, grrfield said: I'd like to see it merged too. When i test a file before i host a wad, i just fire it up and discard it if it does not work "out of the box". Why? Because there can be so many reasons why it does not work: - it is not intended for the source port i always use (which is zandronum - and this forum is not entirely dedicated to zandronum) - it may not be compatible with the mods i constantly use - it may be just, well, .... not so very well made so it just breaks... - it uses some obscure other features that i'm not aware of - it may require other files that i overlooked in the first place...(which is the case we are dealing with here). When i play on other servers it won't normally pose a big problem, since cc-tex will be dl'd automatically (if for some obscure reason you don't already have it on your harddrive somewhere), but in setting up a server myself i select wads on there "availability to use out of the box". I am sure many people think like me when they fire up a server on TSPG or whatever other platform. Call it laziness, but it is what it is.... Don't break the great work you did in making this stuff and just merge all necessary things into the wad. It'll guarantee more success It will also bloat the file size by a large amount. The text file clearly states you need cc4 tex, if you wish to discard it I completely understand, but spending a minute reading to see "Oh this needs cc4 tex, something I have" isn't too much to ask for. Plus, if you also look in the original thread, it clearly states it uses cc4 tex, so it means you would need it if it doesnt come with. I'm sorry that you won't try the wad, because there are a lot of great maps in here, but I understand your reasoning. It was either increase the file size massively, or add cc4 tex to the zip file, which I would not do even if I were allowed. 0 Share this post Link to post
grrfield Posted January 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Phade102 said: It will also bloat the file size by a large amount. The text file clearly states you need cc4 tex, if you wish to discard it I completely understand, but spending a minute reading to see "Oh this needs cc4 tex, something I have" isn't too much to ask for. Plus, if you also look in the original thread, it clearly states it uses cc4 tex, so it means you would need it if it doesnt come with. I'm sorry that you won't try the wad, because there are a lot of great maps in here, but I understand your reasoning. It was either increase the file size massively, or add cc4 tex to the zip file, which I would not do even if I were allowed. We are both right and wrong, i guess. You're right when you say that reading the txt isn't too much asked. Since i know now, i will include the cc4.tex ofc. My point just is that there are a lot of people out there that are not following any forums or don't practic online doom. They will dl the wad from idgames and ... it won't work. Tough choices... Best of luck though 0 Share this post Link to post
Misty Posted January 4, 2018 With texture maintenance file size shouldn't go bloat that much. If people can't handle few more megabytes in wad, it will be their problem. Have you ever removed unused textures, flats and patches from your own wads? Same thing goes with this compilation. Heck I even used bigger texture set for speedmapping session few weeks ago and with removed unused things file size didn't increase so much. Mostly you need take care of animated textures, because prboom+ won't run wad if one frame is missed. 0 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted January 4, 2018 20 minutes ago, grrfield said: We are both right and wrong, i guess. You're right when you say that reading the txt isn't too much asked. Since i know now, i will include the cc4.tex ofc. My point just is that there are a lot of people out there that are not following any forums or don't practic online doom. They will dl the wad from idgames and ... it won't work. Tough choices... Best of luck though You are actually complete right in one aspect. I should have made it more clear in the text file that it needs CC4-tex to run 0 Share this post Link to post
Phade102 Posted January 4, 2018 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Myst.Haruko said: With texture maintenance file size shouldn't go bloat that much. If people can't handle few more megabytes in wad, it will be their problem. Have you ever removed unused textures, flats and patches from your own wads? Same thing goes with this compilation. Heck I even used bigger texture set for speedmapping session few weeks ago and with removed unused things file size didn't increase so much. Mostly you need take care of animated textures, because prboom+ won't run wad if one frame is missed. the project is released. I dont have the time to go back and redo all that, plus, with all the varied mapping styles here Its unlikely there are a lot of textures to remove, since so many would have been used. I'm sorry that you aren't happy, but theres nothing I can do at this point. EDIT: I have updated the original post to state it needs cc4-tex to run. If people are not willing to get that, then I dont know what to suggest. 0 Share this post Link to post