Reisal Posted January 6, 2003 Can't we have at least 50x50? 35x35 is squintable on my 1280x1024 res 0 Share this post Link to post
Ichor Posted January 6, 2003 Actually, it's 36x36. 71 pixels make aaaaall the difference, doesn't it, heheh? 0 Share this post Link to post
Grazza Posted January 6, 2003 Mr. Chris said:Can't we have at least 50x50?I guess you've never tried connecting to Doomworld via a mobile phone. Even some of the fancier 36x36 avatars cause an irritating delay. 0 Share this post Link to post
Remilia Scarlet Posted January 6, 2003 I didn't know phones could check out webpages. Then again, I have a crap phone. My question is, can a PDA like a Palm Pilot connect to webpages? I'd like to see 60x60 avatars, but I understand people with slower connections. Why not enable 60x60 ones, then have an option to automatically shrink them? Like, if you access it with one of these phones, let the user set an option to shrink them and set it in a cookie. Then again, I'm not even sure if this is possible. 0 Share this post Link to post
IMJack Posted January 6, 2003 Upping the avatar size would simply be the first step down a path of teh retardedness. Linguica wouldn't like it. 0 Share this post Link to post
nxn Posted January 6, 2003 Grazza said:I guess you've never tried connecting to Doomworld via a mobile phone. Even some of the fancier 36x36 avatars cause an irritating delay. You've browsed the forums using a cell phone before? I consider the cell phone the key to social freedom... and you're using it to browse the forums. Your right to use the cell phone is taken away, I now expect you to ship it over here to me where it can be used for the many ways of making money. (meep meep) Anyway, back on topic, I support bigger avatars as well, 50x50 is nice and sexy, plus many people already did something to their current avatar to make it that size in order for it to fit in as your buddyicon on aim.Upping the avatar size would simply be the first step down a path of teh retardedness. No, the first and only step to teh retardedness which already exists was banning Lüt.Linguica wouldn't like it. I hate to break it to ya, but ling doesn't give a rat's ass anymore, and I doubt he would have before either. 0 Share this post Link to post
Amaster Posted January 6, 2003 Mr. Chris said:Can't we have at least 50x50? 35x35 is squintable on my 1280x1024 res Im running at the same resolution and it looks fine to me. Why do you need such a huge avatar? EDIT: 50 by 50 would look ridiculous and cluttered. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lizardcommando Posted January 6, 2003 At first, I didn't like how the size limit for Avatars are 36 x 36, but I've gotten used to it. It's better to have tiny avatars then to have none at all. :p 0 Share this post Link to post
Silverwyvern Posted January 6, 2003 I'd like a bigger avatar too.. so I can see what the heck mine is ;) *is working towards having a custom one someday* 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted January 6, 2003 Mr. Chris said:Can't we have at least 50x50? 35x35 is squintable on my 1280x1024 res Lower your screen resolution - it's that simple. 0 Share this post Link to post
Captain Red Posted January 6, 2003 nxn meephead I'd hate to sound as stupid as... I am, but is this our favorite druggy under a new name? 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted January 6, 2003 Judging by the fact that Mr Druggie also went under the nick NXN elsewhere, I'd say yes. And I don't like to see larger avatars than 36x36 on DW - having so little space to work with is good practice for me when I want to do fishie avatars and yup, bigger avatars will lead to increased retardation imo. 0 Share this post Link to post
Shaviro Posted January 6, 2003 The avatars are not for looking at. They simply put a little personality into it and makes it easier and faster to recognize the poster. Bigger avatars would look incredibly stupid. 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted January 6, 2003 Shaviro said:The avatars are not for looking at. They simply put a little personality into it and makes it easier and faster to recognize the poster. Bigger avatars would look incredibly stupid. Of course, making a prettier looking avatar is always fun...No, the first and only step to teh retardedness which already exists was banning Lüt. If you had been the Webmaster and someone blocked you from your own website I think you'd ban the person and generally be pissed at him. Maintaining a website like this is friggin' hard and complicated work. I think Ling got pissed because suddenly he had to spend forever working his ass off just to get back on the site. So this "retardedness" you implied really came from Lüt if you ask me - I don't blame him though, seeing as I eventually got tired of being a nice, helpful person myself (that's why people now think I'm too strict, which I probably am too). 0 Share this post Link to post
AirRaid Posted January 6, 2003 Mr. Chris said:35x35 is squintable on my 1280x1024 res I'm in 1600x1200 and the 36x36 ones are fine... 0 Share this post Link to post
Julian Posted January 6, 2003 Mr. Chris said:Can't we have at least 50x50? 35x35 is squintable on my 1280x1024 res There will be no size increase. We're happy with how our forums look so far. Big avatars distract attention. As Shav pointed it, avatars are just here to personalize/help figuring out who's posting quickly. 0 Share this post Link to post
FirebrandX Posted January 6, 2003 I personally don't care if the avatars never get any bigger on Doomworld, however, I do want to point out that forums I moderate use 100x100 avs and it looks perfectly fine. No clutter and no complaints thus far. Of course, if you really want to have fun with avs, check Doom Depot's forums. You can make huge animated avs to your heart's content. 0 Share this post Link to post
Bloodshedder Posted January 6, 2003 FirebrandX said:Of course, if you really want to have fun with avs, check Doom Depot's forums. You can make huge animated avs to your heart's content. Likewise on the Doomcenter forums, but I doubt reducing avatar size would reduce retardedness of content in that case. 0 Share this post Link to post
Fredrik Posted January 6, 2003 Avatars = dumb. It's the content of your posts that matters. lolkekekekekekekekekLoolprrrrrrrrfffff~~~sdfglk*:E 0 Share this post Link to post
Darkstalker Posted January 6, 2003 Fredrik said:lolkekekekekekekekekLoolprrrrrrrrfffff~~~sdfglk*:E Fredrik's title: Total Retard Custom title also helps to see what kind of person is talking :P 0 Share this post Link to post
nxn Posted January 6, 2003 Yeah, it is me, teh or1n, comming at you live from an ugly basement in PA.dsm said:Of course, making a prettier looking avatar is always fun... If you had been the Webmaster and someone blocked you from your own website I think you'd ban the person and generally be pissed at him. Maintaining a website like this is friggin' hard and complicated work. I think Ling got pissed because suddenly he had to spend forever working his ass off just to get back on the site. Heh, not this discussion again, it was an obvious joke, and this "working his ass off" you speak of, I'm pretty sure it took less than 2 minutes. Ling just needs to re-adjust his sence of humor. So this "retardedness" you implied really came from Lüt if you ask me - I don't blame him though, seeing as I eventually got tired of being a nice, helpful person myself (that's why people now think I'm too strict, which I probably am too). Now this I must argue. How could it have came from him if he was banned? I do recall the forums being in excellent shape before his banning, so if anything his lack of presence is what caused the forums to pretty much be like they are at this moment. And you know perfectly well they aren't as good as they used to be, otherwise all those people would have never left. Back on topic, I fail to see how a few (well 1204) pixels would cause this forum to go out of control and start a spontanous generation of retards. I really couldn't picture there being anyone here that would start running around with their genitals out just because they have a little bit more freedom. Shit, honestly I couldn't even picture myself doing that if I won the cannabis cup (my new goal in life). =P Actually, I suppose you could say large bright images would attract more youth over here, but still, I don't think 50x50 is large, I only want it because it's a more practical size, and maybe because my moose fish's antler seems to be cut off right now. I guess that's of no concern to you people though, so I'll end my bitching. 0 Share this post Link to post
Fletcher` Posted January 6, 2003 nxn said:No, the first and only step to teh retardedness which already exists was banning Lüt. Wrong. Darkstalker said:Custom title also helps to see what kind of person is talking :P Heh. :) 0 Share this post Link to post
nxn Posted January 6, 2003 ravage said:Haven't you seen him on lately? Wake up. By banning I also meant demoding, him just posting here has no effect on everyone else's behavior, him modding this place would. Now don't make me stuff my pillow down your throat. =P 0 Share this post Link to post
Fletcher` Posted January 6, 2003 I made a mistake. I usually don't think before I speak. Oh, and your pillow wouldn't last very long. ;) 0 Share this post Link to post
Amaster Posted January 7, 2003 While we're on the subject, where's a good place to upload my custom avatar? 0 Share this post Link to post
nxn Posted January 7, 2003 Assmaster said:While we're on the subject, where's a good place to upload my custom avatar? Get someone to upload it for you on their server for 5 minutes, then log into the user acount and specify the URL. After that the image is stored on dw and the person that's storing that image can delete it. I'd do it for you, but I lost access to /demise =P 0 Share this post Link to post