Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Remilia Scarlet

Synthy poll

Which kind of synth?  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Which kind of synth?

    • Software Synth (Rebirth/Reason/Microsoft GM synth)
      4
    • Only VA Synths (Virtual Analog...like a Nord Lead)
      0
    • Only True Analogs (like Moogs)
      2
    • Only Digitals (most synths today)
      2
    • Any kind of hardware synth (VA, true, or digital).
      4
    • VA and True Analogs only
      0
    • VA and Digital Only
      0
    • True Analog and Digital Only
      0
    • Some other combination (specifiy, please).
      1


Recommended Posts

Ok, I'm in a synth mood. I just have to know:

Which do you all prefer?

Me? Hardware all the way. I have an extreme dislike for software synths. If I had the money, I'd be True Analog all the way. Now, where to find a MiniMoog...

Most of the synths listed can be found at either sonicstate.com or synthmuseum.com

Share this post


Link to post

Whatever sounds the best.

90% of the time it's hardware, but there are also some excellent soundfonts available which sound far better than any hardware I've ever heard.

BTW, mine.

Share this post


Link to post

Yamaha's XG synths. I don't have a hardware one at the moment. But my software one with a 2MB wavetable sounds a lot better than a Creative synth with a 40MB soundfont.

Demos and fun shit at yamaha-xg.com

Share this post


Link to post

Despite my knowlege and love of music, I don't know much about synths. That's why I'm going to school to learn such things. :P Moogs own though.

Share this post


Link to post

I have about 500MB of soundfonts. Some of them are great, my problem is mainly that I can't set per-channel treble and reverb levels with MIDI :\

Share this post


Link to post
Python_Junkie said:

What I prefer: Hardware...doesn't get any better than that

What I can afford: Software

Ditto.

Heh...Fruity Loops!!!1

Share this post


Link to post

This topic is more and more making me want to buy my friend's synthesizer and interface it with my computer...after hearing that, I've got a feeling I'd cream my jeans hearing a DOOM MIDI on that ;)

Share this post


Link to post

FM/PSG, whatever that falls under.

Of course I like wavetable for MIDI. I have an SBLive (which I've been disappointed with, but Yamaha stuff is expensive) and I also have WinGroove, which is a pretty good, light software synth.

Share this post


Link to post

all I have really is the GM wavetable on my comp, no reverb or chorus effects. I wanna buy my school's Roland Juno 106, they never use it, and it's a killer classic synth.

Share this post


Link to post

i'll use whatever works for what i'm needing at the moment (within my budget, of course), but i perfer hardware over software. yamaha's xg is great, my sis got a yamaha rxg500 for her birthday and it's quite useful. still, i can usually only afford software, i'm just glad that i got a yamaha synthesiser for my laptop, MIDI just doesn't sound the same without it. i'm trying to find a yamaha qy70, my friend's got one and they're the shit. i'd like a 100 though seeing as the MIDI overdriven guitar sucks.

oh yeah, Reznor says to buy a G5 if you can afford it. :)

Share this post


Link to post

Anyone seen an OPL3 emulator? I miss FM midi. The last computers with those chips were made in about 1999. I have emulators for Adlib and SID but not OPL3.

Share this post


Link to post

analog synth as heard in goa and psytrance is much superior to digital and software synths... software analog simulators are nowhere near perfect. There are some decent digital synths but I still believe analog is much better. Hopefully in the future the quality of software synths improves.

Share this post


Link to post

Most software that emulates some kind of hardware is written in a high-level way that emulates what it outputs vs. what it actually does. For example, Ken Silverman's Adlib emulator has rather short code and there's no way it actually emulates the chip. If it did, he wouldn't be complaining about some of it sounding weird.

The best way to emulate an analog synth would be to literally emulate the electronics. Would be a much fatter and processor-intensive program though.

I still miss my FM midi and I can't put an old SB16 or whatever in my laptop. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Aliotroph? said:

The best way to emulate an analog synth would be to literally emulate the electronics. Would be a much fatter and processor-intensive program though.

The thing with analog is that you really can't fully emulate it. Once you digitize a sound wave, in any way, you still introduce error due to the inablility to be precise. If you were able to zoom in on a sine wave close enough, you'd see stair stepping due to the 1s and 0s that, in the base form, make up a digital sound wave. After this, it has to pass through a DAC (Digital to Analog Converter), which takes 1s and 0s and connects the dots.

In a true analog synth, the sound is produced by a VCO (Voltage Controlled Oscillator). Since it is a true oscillator, using the fluctuations in voltage rather than 1s and 0s to produce the waves, it's precise enough to loose the stairstepping, causing a smooth, natural wave, something a computer can't do. Sure, there are different levels of precision for the oscillators. Some are more precise than others. But, they aren't digital, so they aren't stairstepped.

Computers will never be able to emulate them in software 100%. Thus, computers and digital synths will never have the warmth true analog has.

See here for a more detailed explination: http://www.iaekm.org/archive/p11.html

Share this post


Link to post
Aliotroph? said:

Anyone seen an OPL3 emulator? I miss FM midi. The last computers with those chips were made in about 1999. I have emulators for Adlib and SID but not OPL3.


Hell, I'm still looking for a CMF player that works on a newer machine.

Share this post


Link to post
TeamKill said:

The thing with analog is that you really can't fully emulate it.

Computers can and do emulate analog sound digitally to the point that it is indistinguishable from the "real thing" to human ears.

Share this post


Link to post
Fredrik said:

Computers can and do emulate analog sound digitally to the point that it is indistinguishable from the "real thing" to human ears.

I beg to differ. I can tell by sound the difference between the two.

Share this post


Link to post
TeamKill said:

I beg to differ. I can tell by sound the difference between the two.

For low quality digital sound, obviously.

Share this post


Link to post
Fredrik said:

For low quality digital sound, obviously.

nope, Digital synth, 16-bit 44kHz vs. analog directly coming out of a speaker. I'm the sound specialist where I work.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×