Vegeta Posted January 17, 2005 Can someone post a link to that game thar requires 96 kbs of hard drive space, and has quality close to the most modern fps? 0 Share this post Link to post
Johnatone Posted January 17, 2005 I like the concept of the game, but I couldn't get it to run. Anybody have any suggestions, know any places that have tech info? (Other than the main site, I found it useless). 0 Share this post Link to post
Vegeta Posted January 17, 2005 Thanks, and what about a link to the web site of the game? 0 Share this post Link to post
Donce Posted January 17, 2005 That was just a bit of googling to find the game. Even less googling was needed to find its homepage. 0 Share this post Link to post
Shaikoten Posted January 20, 2005 The team said it themselves, this game isn't fun... at least not yet. But it still goes down as amazing in my book. (Smaller than UT2K4's readme, and comparable graphics to the 5gb or so game) 0 Share this post Link to post
Lord FlatHead Posted January 20, 2005 Shaikoten said:and comparable graphics to the 5gb or so game Said it before and will say it again: graphics does not equal number of instructions per pixel. It's obvious man-years of artist time went into UT2k4; this 96k game, while being technically impressive, honestly doesn't look very impressive graphically. 0 Share this post Link to post
spank Posted January 21, 2005 People seem to forget the difference between graphics and artwork. The latter is more important. Just look at Warcraft 3 for example. Is there a prettier game than that? 0 Share this post Link to post
Sharessa Posted January 22, 2005 spank said:Is there a prettier game than that? World of Warcraft is. 0 Share this post Link to post
-Jk- Posted January 22, 2005 I still like Diablo II. That is some nice artwork. 0 Share this post Link to post