Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Sign in to follow this  
Macro11_1

How do I use line-type 255

Recommended Posts

Hi all there again, here with another editing question.

In Boom format for Doombuilder, I am trying to create a scrolling wall with line-type 255.

It reads in Doombuilder "Scroll wall using Sidedef offsets", and in the Tutorials posted on DoomWorld @ this link http://www.doomworld.com/tutorials/boom3.php
It says the same thing, yet with more words.

Heres what I am doing, I give the line the type 255, and set its Texture 's X offset to 128.

Nothing happens.

Am I doing anything wrong, or can some one give me a step by step way to do this? I really hope some one can help me with this.

If you want me to post an example, just ask.

P.S. This map is for boom, but I am testing in zdoom, And no, I cannot change it since it is for a public project with the requirement of the map being boom compatible.

Share this post


Link to post
Macro11_1 said:

If you want me to post an example, just ask.

http://www.doomworld.com/idgames/index.php?id=9461
Linedef 244

Macro11_1 said:

Heres what I am doing, I give the line the type 255, and set its Texture 's X offset to 128.

Nothing happens.

Maybe length of your line is 128 and uncapped framerate (interpolation between frames) is switched off

Share this post


Link to post
Macro11_1 said:

Heres what I am doing, I give the line the type 255, and set its Texture 's X offset to 128.

128 would be extremely fast, try just 1 instead, and test it with PrBoom.

Share this post


Link to post
Ajapted said:

128 would be extremely fast, try just 1 instead, and test it with PrBoom.

Like moving 128 pixels every tic!
35 in a second :P

Share this post


Link to post
doom2day said:

Like moving 128 pixels every tic!
35 in a second :P


Yeah. The reason why 128 looked like it wasn't working was because it was moving 128 units per tic, and most Doom textures are either 64 or 128 units wide, so it'd look like it was staying completely still.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
×