DuckReconMajor Posted April 21, 2009 Lol we watched this in my English class as an example of pathos (emotional proof). Oh and lol @ 0:47 "A Rainbow Coalition" 0 Share this post Link to post
Captain Red Posted April 21, 2009 Stop interfering with my rights to interfere with other peoples rights! 0 Share this post Link to post
alexz721 Posted April 21, 2009 How sweet would it be if lightning bolts took them all out 0 Share this post Link to post
Technician Posted April 21, 2009 And every one of those people also want to ban evolution I'm sure. 0 Share this post Link to post
Captain Red Posted April 21, 2009 DuckReconMajor said: "A Rainbow Coalition" They made this shit too easy. 0 Share this post Link to post
Sharessa Posted April 21, 2009 The same-sex advocates want to do what now? [CITATION NEEDED] 0 Share this post Link to post
destx Posted April 21, 2009 A lot of the related videos are fucking gold. 0 Share this post Link to post
Bashe Posted April 21, 2009 Just needs some Raunchous Brothers blasting in the background and it's the perfect anti-gay video. And that's bad. Why do these people even exist 0 Share this post Link to post
Georgef551 Posted April 21, 2009 For those of you who say I kiss ass of the Elephant, here's one for you: Dead wrong. These groups should not interfere with anyone's right to marriage, or a civil union if it makes everyone happy. I think if a church want to be homophobic and not practice same-sex marriage, then that's fine, but condemning others that support same-sex marriage is not right. They are scared.......Yeah, traditional marriage isn't going away, gays and lesbians want marraige too, and that's all they're asking for. Suddenly, those not like them (the straight elephants) are evil, and will ruin the world as we know it...... Bull. You saw it, me in support of a libral idea. Gay marriage should be allowed. 0 Share this post Link to post
Julian Posted April 21, 2009 Georgef551 said:You saw it, me in support of a libral idea. Still have some trouble spelling it... I can understand, can be painful ;) More seriously, I don't really understand who would be stupid enough to give into any of this NOM video. And THANK YOU COLBERT, you definitely deserve your name in space now! 0 Share this post Link to post
Georgef551 Posted April 21, 2009 Die-hard religous wackos would. :) That, and Texas. 0 Share this post Link to post
Butts Posted April 22, 2009 Wow, what a totally great video that is totally right about everything. I wasn't so sure what I was thinking before, I was totally planning on voting no on "prop 8", but this video made me change my mind. I had a feeling that gay people were responsible for "Katrina" and causing people depression, and... Unemployment? Every time a gay couple gets married, a kitten dies. Do you want to save the kittens, or are you a cruel freak who cares not for the rights and life of anyone or anything? Stop killing innocent kittens and ban gay marriage! I'm cereal. Super duper cereal. 0 Share this post Link to post
DuckReconMajor Posted April 22, 2009 So, if my reasoning is correct, that means for every gay couple kept from getting married, a post gets deleted from Everything Else. Count me in. 0 Share this post Link to post
glaber Posted April 22, 2009 These people are going to have to learn the hard way. Gay's CAN'T reproduce. If nature intended for us to be gay, women would not exist. 0 Share this post Link to post
DuckReconMajor Posted April 22, 2009 glaber said:These people are going to have to learn the hard way. Gay's CAN'T reproduce. If nature intended for us to be gay, women would not exist. I am confused as to your stance on the issue. 0 Share this post Link to post
Bank Posted April 22, 2009 glaber said:These people are going to have to learn the hard way. Gay's CAN'T reproduce. If nature intended for us to be gay, women would not exist. The hard way? What's that, listening to your blather? 0 Share this post Link to post
Csonicgo Posted April 22, 2009 Bank said:The hard way? Oh this is too easy. 0 Share this post Link to post
skadoomer Posted April 22, 2009 I find this matter interesting. Not in any practical terms, its just interesting. Interesting because its over a technicality in a religion full of technicality's. Interesting because somehow this changes everything. Because if people see something, they'll try it without thinking about whether they'll like it or not right? If nature intended for us to be gay, women would not exist. Maybe, and maybe god will come back and take all the women away. 0 Share this post Link to post
AndrewB Posted April 22, 2009 glaber said:These people are going to have to learn the hard way. Gay's CAN'T reproduce. If nature intended for us to be gay, women would not exist. If nature intended for everyone to have nipples, men wouldn't exist. 0 Share this post Link to post
GreyGhost Posted April 22, 2009 glaber said:If nature intended for us to be gay... Men wouldn't exist and humanity would use parthenogenesis as it's reproductive strategy. 0 Share this post Link to post
Infinite Ammunition Posted April 22, 2009 glaber said:These people are going to have to learn the hard way. Gay's CAN'T reproduce. If nature intended for us to be gay, women would not exist. the "natural" and "normal" arguments are a nice way to fall back on appeals to emotion without casual observers catching it, no? 0 Share this post Link to post
Stupid Bunny Posted April 22, 2009 glaber said:These people are going to have to learn the hard way. Gay's CAN'T reproduce. If nature intended for us to be gay, women would not exist. And maybe, perhaps...it's possible that people can live out their lives happy and fulfilled without ever reproducing? Defying nature's intent isn't that hard and I doubt most gay couples care what nature wants. (They definitely don't care what a bunch of ultra-conservative yoyos say God's intent is.) 0 Share this post Link to post
Xenaero Posted April 22, 2009 glaber said:These people are going to have to learn the hard way. Gay's CAN'T reproduce. If nature intended for us to be gay, women would not exist. I'm not sure what you're getting at here. Who's got to learn the hard way? I think it's fairly obvious to everyone that gay and lesbian couples can't reproduce, at least not directly with each other. That doesn't stop them from their pursuit of happiness, though. Can you define 'natural' for me? While you're at it, might as well tell me what 'normal' is, too. Note: They're both subjective in the context you are using them, and as such, cannot be applied to the spectrum of peoples and cultures, some of which would otherwise be branded by individuals like yourself as immoral or unnatural. Your theory of women not existing is instantly debunked by the fact that there's gays out there in our society, and women still do exist, believe it or not! Thus your belief on what is or is not natural does not hold water in reality. 0 Share this post Link to post
Technician Posted April 22, 2009 Butts said:I'm cereal. Super duper cereal. Excelsior! 0 Share this post Link to post
Captain Red Posted April 22, 2009 Gays can't get married because water is wet. You're just going to have to learn the hard way. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kirby Posted April 22, 2009 Captain Red said:Gays can't get married because water is wet. You're just going to have to learn the hard way. The water is dry dammit! In any case, I agree with what Xenaero said. Pursuit of happiness is the equal right of all peoples, and I don't really see the point in denying that. To me this feels more like a seperation of church/state issue and where you feel marriage falls under. 0 Share this post Link to post
Sharessa Posted April 22, 2009 glaber said:Gay's CAN'T reproduce. Yep, helps to solve overpopulation. Actually, there is a theory out there that homosexuality exists in nature as a means of population control. Makes sense. Also, nice troll. Got like half the forum with that one. 0 Share this post Link to post