Nightmare Doom Posted August 6, 2010 http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Doom even says a few things about the Doom Community. 0 Share this post Link to post
Csonicgo Posted August 6, 2010 Someone has made that article actually funny. 0 Share this post Link to post
Fletcher` Posted August 6, 2010 there is absolutely no talk about ralphjis or ud, or even linguica. gay. 0 Share this post Link to post
dew Posted August 6, 2010 rf` said:there is absolutely no talk about ralphjis or ud have you tried zdaemon's separate article? 0 Share this post Link to post
Nameless Posted August 6, 2010 I thought the article was going to be more nastier. It was actually rather tame for being ED. I guess the RRRRRAAAAAGEEEE!! just isn't what it used to be. 0 Share this post Link to post
chungy Posted August 6, 2010 ED is barely above Uncyclopedia in entertainment. The writing style of average-retarded-internet-troll gets old fast. 0 Share this post Link to post
Bank Posted August 6, 2010 chungy said:ED is barely above Uncyclopedia in entertainment. The writing style of average-retarded-internet-troll gets old fast. All of these style sites all follow the TV Tropian "we've made up so many terms for things that it's essentially a different language, enjoy the links" writing method. 0 Share this post Link to post
Nameless Posted August 6, 2010 I boycott uncyclopedia and I will never let it befoul my web-browser. End. 0 Share this post Link to post
Abyssalstudios1 Posted August 6, 2010 Doomworld is known for its highly intelligent, calm and reasonable members who certainly don't ragequit over trivial manners. ...The majority of users on Doomworld fucking hate modern games. If you praise Halo, Call of Duty 4, Bioshock, or some other shitty games chances are the oldfags of Doomworld will form an angry mob and take turns raping your sorry ass. I lol'ed. Also, there's a link in that article to Cutman Mike's very own Urban Dictionary definition: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=CutManMike 0 Share this post Link to post
Reisal Posted August 7, 2010 I was amused, particularly by the CJWright portion as well. I also LOLed at the ZDoom link mentioning a gay furry dating sim mod. 0 Share this post Link to post
Nomad Posted August 7, 2010 Nameless said:I boycott uncyclopedia and I will never let it befoul my web-browser. End. What relevance has that to this thread? 0 Share this post Link to post
Kelzam Posted August 7, 2010 Abyssalstudios1 said:...The majority of users on Doomworld fucking hate modern games. If you praise Halo, Call of Duty 4, Bioshock, or some other shitty games chances are the oldfags of Doomworld will form an angry mob and take turns raping your sorry ass. I lol'ed. Pretty accurate tbh. The Tormentor667 section was the best though. 0 Share this post Link to post
Planky Posted August 7, 2010 Someone spent a fair bit of time on it. Needs moar links to over 9000 though. Nomad said:Nameless said:I boycott uncyclopedia and I will never let it befoul my web-browser. End. What relevance has that to this thread? Because chungy mentioned it? chungy said:ED is barely above Uncyclopedia in entertainment. The writing style of average-retarded-internet-troll gets old fast. 0 Share this post Link to post
GreyGhost Posted August 7, 2010 Several someone's have worked on it and at least one is well acquainted with the Doom community. Wonder what name/s they use when posting here? 0 Share this post Link to post
printz Posted August 7, 2010 Hokutonodick = the Doom Marine? Regardless,Eternity Engine is better than Zdoom and has more flexibility for modding ;) 0 Share this post Link to post
Xaser Posted August 7, 2010 FFFFFFUUUUUUUUU~ *ahem*, excuse me. So, an ED link? Meh... at least Uncyclopedia can be witty and spawn a chuckle or two. Because no discussion about one of the two anti-wikis can take place without comparing it to the other, eh? THERE I SAID IT 0 Share this post Link to post
printz Posted August 7, 2010 I've always found Uncyclopedia to be filled with randomness caused by clashing senses of humour. Also, I have low patience reading the opening quotes and don't see much of their point (many of them are attributed to Wylde, by the way). Encyclopedia Dramatica: no mandatory quotes, and a focused sense of humor that's coherent: insulting people. EDIT: Oops, I just misspelled a dead author's name. This is a big one. :o 0 Share this post Link to post
Mr. Freeze Posted August 7, 2010 Uncyclopedia isn't funny at all. Fuck "randumb" humor. ED is a newfag breeding ground and the epicenter of Project Chanology. Nothing to see here, folks. 0 Share this post Link to post
CODOR Posted August 7, 2010 This is probably the most accurate article on Encyclopedia Dramatica. 0 Share this post Link to post
Craigs Posted August 7, 2010 Xaser said:FFFFFFUUUUUUUUU~ *ahem*, excuse me. So, an ED link? Meh... at least Uncyclopedia can be witty and spawn a chuckle or two. Uncyclopedia articles are complete shit. There are the occassional good ones such as the "Me" page, but after a while a bunch of unfunny idiots stumble upon it and fuck it up with stupid shit like this:LOL I AM TEH N00B PWNR. ROFL HA8XOR. MMMM WAFFLES RULE TEH PICKLED WORLD! LOLOLOLOLOL I AM MARRIED AND HAVE NO KIDS! I think the fact that the shitty changes were never reverted and the only thing the staff did was lock editing on that page shows just how incompetent they are as well. ED pretty much summed up my impression of Uncyclopedia http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Uncyclopedia 0 Share this post Link to post
Sharessa Posted August 7, 2010 ED is where I go if a meme pops up on 4chan or elsewhere and I have no idea where it came from. Uncyclopedia is just terrible humor. 0 Share this post Link to post
Prince of Darkness Posted August 7, 2010 GreyGhost said:Several someone's have worked on it and at least one is well acquainted with the Doom community. Wonder what name/s they use when posting here? I might as well raise my hand and see what happens. I was actually thinking of rewriting the page itself in it's entirety, but I don't know if I want to take on such a task again. And no Planky, I will not reference "Over 9000" in the article. Even that gets old. 0 Share this post Link to post
Ralphis Posted August 7, 2010 dew said:have you tried zdaemon's separate article? I'm not in that either! Phew! 0 Share this post Link to post
Xaser Posted August 8, 2010 Craigs said:I think the fact that the shitty changes were never reverted and the only thing the staff did was lock editing on that page shows just how incompetent they are as well. Now there's something hilariously terrible that most of us can appreciate. :P I always did like the AAA article, but never really bothered to surf it much aside from the random "see this!" links I used to get. 0 Share this post Link to post
AndrewB Posted August 8, 2010 I am captivated by this: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Game:Do_NOT_click_any_links!/click 0 Share this post Link to post
SteelPH Posted August 8, 2010 Mr. Freeze said:Uncyclopedia isn't funny at all. Fuck "randumb" humor. ED is a newfag breeding ground and the epicenter of Project Chanology. Nothing to see here, folks. 0 Share this post Link to post