Katarhyne Posted November 6, 2002 Well, consider that prices don't really change. What you get does. 0 Share this post Link to post
Radea` Posted November 6, 2002 For some reason I can't seem to properly adjust my resolution...I tried using the 'custom_width/height' commands, but to no avail. =/ If you want to use the r_customwidth/height commands, 1st off r_mode needs to be "-1" (w/out quotes of course). So for 1280x960 r_mode -1 r_customwidth 1280 r_customheight 960 gl_restart (i think thats it :P) Hope that helps, and ill try to post some 640x480 FPS's, but im @ school right now. <Edit> I guess its vid_restart :) </Edit> 0 Share this post Link to post
Fredrik Posted November 6, 2002 vid_restart And I think you can put "-1" in quotes, it shouldn't matter. 0 Share this post Link to post
Disorder Posted November 7, 2002 Well, I just figured out that there's no way in hell that I'm gonna have the money soon to be able to buy all the hardware to get doom III running smoothly. No fucking way. And I hardly have time for a job.. I think I'm gonna shoot myself now. 0 Share this post Link to post
AirRaid Posted November 8, 2002 I have a slower system than you, and I most likely get less money than you. (Blah, except I already have a decent enough GFX card) 0 Share this post Link to post
Use Posted November 8, 2002 Katarhyne said:YES! On a high-speed Athlon system, merely moving from PC133 SDRAM to the same amount of PC2100 DDR SDRAM can give you as much as 15% improvement in performance across the board, and as much as 50% in some things, including Quake-engined games, which traditionally benefit hugely from increased memory bandwidth. It's not unrealistic nor unreasonable to assume that Doom 3 will have similar affection towards huge main memory bandwidth. On Pentium 4s it's even more pronounced. Going from SDRAM to DDR SDRAM can double or even triple...performance in some things, and will generally give a greater-than-fifty-percent increase in performance across the board. Going from DDR SDRAM to Rambus DRAM can give a small performance increase in some things, but it really doesn't justify the cost against the three negative factors to RDRAM... Amazing, someone other than me knows about ram. Yes it's true, anything above a pIII using straight up SDR ram is uselss. You're forcing your fancy pants processor through a peephole. I'm using the lowest speed DDR ram for my board and it's what is slowing my doomIII experience down. Disorder, start mowing lawns! anything! just buy your parts one at a time, and for the sake of god don't be fooled by crappy Dells or Gateways ripoff deals. You'll get a substandared computer for way too much money. Some people i know that don't listen to real computer experts bought a Gateway almost 2 years ago (a PIII 1.2 or something) and they're still paying for it. Don't be one of those poor saps. 0 Share this post Link to post
AirRaid Posted November 8, 2002 I am as of now hoping that Doom3 is delayed so I can get a new motherboard/new RAM by the time it comes out :P 0 Share this post Link to post
Robin Posted November 10, 2002 i get in e3/e3_1 with FULL fx 12-22 fps exploring 2-6 in fighting well i've a p3 1000mhz and a radeon 8500 i think i got a good result. other maps are more slow, especially e3/e3_3 i think due to the map's complexity. 0 Share this post Link to post
Katarhyne Posted November 11, 2002 Sigh. People are unable to read. By the way, all of you people who are getting the same framerates in high and medium detail modes - it's likely because your card doesn't support hardware texture compression. As far as I know, that's all 'high-detail' mode does, is disable compression. 0 Share this post Link to post
doomedout Posted November 12, 2002 My video card is busted up I think, I get 1 FPS in action...Woppdie Do 0 Share this post Link to post
Kain_M Posted November 12, 2002 Hmm.. i started up the demo and behold... 3 fps. Set the thing to 1, 3 fps. What am i doing wrong here? P4 2.53 GHZ Asus-p4t533-r MOBO 512mb RDRAM RIMM4200 1066mhz ATI Radeon 9700 It cannot be my comp... bad drivers maybe? 0 Share this post Link to post
AirRaid Posted November 12, 2002 You get 3 fps with THAT? WTF? Yea try some new drivers or something... ask Kat what drivers she's using. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kain_M Posted November 13, 2002 Silly me, yah, i updated my video card drivers (i recently formatted my HDD's) so they aren't the ones that come on the disc, and now i get about 40-60 fps, average prolly 60.. kinda scared me for a while :D 0 Share this post Link to post
Radea` Posted November 14, 2002 As far as I know, that's all 'high-detail' mode does, is disable compression. Also enables 8X software anisotropic filtering :P. 0 Share this post Link to post
AirRaid Posted November 14, 2002 It also add multiple shadows per object, rather than just one. Check out the Hell Knight at the end of map1 with medium detail, then high. 0 Share this post Link to post
Fredrik Posted November 14, 2002 now i get about 40-60 fps, average prolly 60You get frame rates in the interval 40-60 frames/second, but they average out at 60? Interestingly, that's mathematically impossible. 0 Share this post Link to post
|VaSh| Posted November 25, 2002 amd 2400+ at 2317 mhz fsb at 167 ram 512 ddr 200 radeon 9700 pro oc msi kt 400 8x fps: average of 53. Runs about 60 normaly and 43-56 with action. Durins the sequince with marine dodging bullets had 49 fps. 0 Share this post Link to post