forum rules (about bumping old threads)

[stoned]

Umm, isn't it better to bump threads, than to make a new thread on the same subject every other week? What's the point on having hundreds of same threads?
Don't bump old threads, make new ones? Now that's just stupid. It's the other way around usually, on most forums anyway...

[Naked Snake]

But they are old, so nobody sees them anyway, so who gives a fuck? Why do you want to bump an old-ass 6 month old thread that's stale as fuck when you could start a new one and maybe even offer a new view or whatever.

[doomaddict]

Tthreads that reach the time limit should automatically be closed.

[Fredrik]

Resurrecting old topics by posting in old threads = bad
Resurrecting old topics by creating new threads = bad

Sorry, nothing can be done to change this law. Just cope.

[Naked Snake]

doomaddict said:

Tthreads that reach the time limit should automatically be closed.

They could hack it in, but it'd be a waste of time.

[Relica Religia]

doomaddict said:

Tthreads that reach the time limit should automatically be closed.

Yet you still post in them anyways.

[doomaddict]

Relica Religia said:

Yet you still post in them anyways.

How can we talk abou the topic then if we can't start a new thread about it?

[darknation]

derail this one with cunning wankshit

[DOOM Anomaly]

doomaddict said:

Tthreads that reach the time limit should automatically be closed.

I thought that after a long time threads automatically close themselves? Correct me if I'm wrong though. Is anyone sure of such information? :D

[Linguica]

DOOM Anomaly said:

I thought that after a long time threads automatically close themselves? Correct me if I'm wrong though. Is anyone sure of such information? :D

Used to, don't anymore.