doowrag327 Posted August 10, 2004 Did anyone else find that wasteland review to be ridiculous? I'm not mad because the idiot gave D3 a 4/10, but because it doesn't even seem like he's got his facts straight. He said that the original DOOM's goal was to activate a wind generator? Don't remember that, even if I did only have the shareware of the original. "Cut and Paste" monster models - aka the best looking monsters a video game has ever seen. "It was praised as the best action game since Quake" - Doom 1 came out about 3 years before Quake, so this sentence doesn't even make sense. And Doom II came out in 1994, not 1996. If its a joke I don't get it. 0 Share this post Link to post
Deathmatcher Posted August 10, 2004 Also, the guy doesnt know the correct term behind the abbr. UAC, he mixes up Doom monsters with Doom2 ones, he simply made up an amount of levels for the original Doom, he cannot even count right (Even if Doom2 was released in 1996, that would be 8 years and not 5 from then) And can you tell me where in doom you can find a railgun-wielding Prometeus? *lol* This review cannot even remotely be taken for serious. 0 Share this post Link to post
doowrag327 Posted August 10, 2004 Haha...yeah those were some other flaws I noticed in the review, I was just so pissed and flabergasted at this guys ignorance that I had to post it as soon as possible. On a side note, I'm still pretty early in my Doom 3 stages, I pre-ordered it so I got it the day it came out. I'm in Sector 2 of the Alpha Labs and its been great so far 0 Share this post Link to post
insertwackynamehere Posted August 11, 2004 Nope no windmills. There was never anything that in depth. What a dumbass 0 Share this post Link to post
Grazza Posted August 11, 2004 This review is a pure wind-up. Look at the url. And the reviewer's "name". If you took that review seriously, you may be interested in this site too. 0 Share this post Link to post
