myk Posted September 1, 2004 (two mile long posts deleted) Hey Godshatter, learn to link stuff; do not cut and paste whole articles on the Forum. 0 Share this post Link to post
Godshatter Posted September 1, 2004 my bad, i shall link btw, how do i hyper link? gokuma i think ur full of shit http://forum.protestwarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=25002&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 start reading at the 2nd post 0 Share this post Link to post
Gokuma Posted September 2, 2004 Wow you love to just ignore hard facts and present just a bunch of statistics which are subject to change at any time. I'm still wondering where this supposed weapons program is. A few lone sarin shells reportedly something like fifteen years old don't constitute a current program. When that one was fired, they didn't even know what they were firing. US authorities saw fit to leave plenty of radiological material in Iraq. They removed stuff they say "could have potentially been used" to make a dirty bomb or for a weapons program, but not that there was any program. There's no recent evidence of a nuclear weapons program. Meanwhile Bush's testing of mininukes is poisoning people out in the west/midwest as winds carry the fallout. (EDIT: Bush is pushing for new nukes). Also CNN is shit. They're not as bad as Fox News but they have history of censoring information damaging to Bush. and learned to type or ur a shithead n a republicoksux0ring won @ that lol!!!!1111one11 0 Share this post Link to post
Linguica Posted September 2, 2004 Gokuma said:Meanwhile Bush's testing of mininukes is poisoning people out in the west/midwest as winds carry the fallout.Exsqueeze me? Baking powder? Bush is TESTING NUKES in America? Source? 0 Share this post Link to post
Arioch Posted September 2, 2004 So that's why I've been losing hair and going blind. DAMN THAT BUSH. 0 Share this post Link to post
Grimm Posted September 2, 2004 Heh, well its not like nukes havent been tested in America before. But still, now we have all of Iraq for that 0 Share this post Link to post
david_a Posted September 2, 2004 Linguica said:Exsqueeze me? Baking powder? Bush is TESTING NUKES in America? Source? I can't find any source saying that testing is actually occuring (I would think that would make the major news sources), but I did find some grumblings that they are considering them: http://www.impeach-bush-now.org/Articles/CampaignMore/bunker.htm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2780521.stm I had never heard of this before. However, I have my doubts that even Bush would start up nuclear weapons again. 0 Share this post Link to post
Gokuma Posted September 2, 2004 http://downwinders.org/ Somewhere I read in tests of their so-called bunker busters they only penetrated 1 meter deep when they were supposed to go 6 meters. And supposedly 6 meters is deep enough to contain the fallout but it's just a lie and it's not. Ok, it seems recent tests didn't actually have a mininuke payload. It's the old nuclear tests and more recent dumping of waste that's poisoned people. But check out the links on this site and you can see they're really pushing ahead for new nukes in their ultimate hypocrisy. 0 Share this post Link to post
Arioch Posted September 2, 2004 So wait, these are COLD WAR ERA nuke tests? Cry me a river. 0 Share this post Link to post
Sephiroth Posted September 2, 2004 there have been no nuke tests in the US sence 1992. actually i think in 1992 they were preparing to do a test, but ended it. besides all the moderns tests where done under ground. sadam was too busy building palaces and fucking whores to even try and start a weapons program. 0 Share this post Link to post
darknation Posted September 2, 2004 so I assume it's cool if you are detonating nukes anywhere else but on american soil? You make the fuckers, you blow up your own damn country if you want to see if they work. And while you are at it, stop burying your toxic shit in international waters. 0 Share this post Link to post
SYS Posted September 2, 2004 Sephiroth said:sadam was too busy building palaces and fucking whores to even try and start a weapons program. He idolized Joseph Stalin. Notice the similarity in their appearance? I can just imagine him now, "Over here we build a palace and we fill it with whores. Upon completion of that palace, we place one here, and we fill that one with twice as many whores. Then we put yet another one in this region, and fill it with, YES YOU GUESSED IT! TRIPLE, the amount of whores!" *fires off his AK, smokes big cuban* 0 Share this post Link to post
fodders Posted September 2, 2004 Full-fledged nuclear tests are off limits but scientists quietly continue to test plutonium's power by exploding small, potent packages 1,000 feet beneath the Nevada desert. Since 1997, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have unleashed a series of tests -- called Bagpipe, Oboe and Clarinet -- attempting to gain new insight into how plutonium behaves under extreme conditions. Next in the series is Piano, a test so powerful scientists may abandon their cost-cutting measure of confining the explosives to a 55-gallon barrel lowered into an underground alcove. They suspect Piano would tear through the inch-thick steel skin of a barrel, so the experiment next year may be detonated directly in the alcove, which then would be sealed. The tests are allowed under the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty because they are subcritical, meaning no critical mass is formed and there is no chain reaction. 0 Share this post Link to post
Ralphis Posted September 2, 2004 fodders said:Full-fledged nuclear tests are off limits but scientists quietly continue to test plutonium's power by exploding small, potent packages 1,000 feet beneath the Nevada desert. Cool, where can I get tickets? 0 Share this post Link to post
gatewatcher Posted September 2, 2004 david_a said:http://www.impeach-bush-now.org/Articles/CampaignMore/bunker.htm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2780521.stm What non-biased sources you have there. 0 Share this post Link to post
Bucket Posted September 2, 2004 The better to amuse you with, my dear. (As if labeling a source 'biased' gives carte-blanche to steamroll through any given evidence or logic without having to rebut.) 0 Share this post Link to post
Scuba Steve Posted September 2, 2004 gatewatcher said:What non-biased sources you have there. Number one yeah... but the second is the BBC, they're usually pretty reliable. 0 Share this post Link to post
deathbringer Posted September 2, 2004 Number one yeah... but the second is the BBC, they're usually pretty reliable. That bloke probably reckons the only reliable source is godhatesfags.com..or FOX 0 Share this post Link to post
Gokuma Posted September 2, 2004 Heh, impeach Bush? While that would be great, it's pretty funny. Who is going to impeach him? The forces the republicans own? 0 Share this post Link to post