96 kb game?

[Vegeta]

Can someone post a link to that game thar requires 96 kbs of hard drive space, and has quality close to the most modern fps?

[Donce]

Try here

[Johnatone]

I like the concept of the game, but I couldn't get it to run. Anybody have any suggestions, know any places that have tech info? (Other than the main site, I found it useless).

[Vegeta]

Thanks, and what about a link to the web site of the game?

[Donce]

That was just a bit of googling to find the game. Even less googling was needed to find its homepage.

[Shaikoten]

The team said it themselves, this game isn't fun... at least not yet. But it still goes down as amazing in my book. (Smaller than UT2K4's readme, and comparable graphics to the 5gb or so game)

[Lord FlatHead]

Shaikoten said:

and comparable graphics to the 5gb or so game

Said it before and will say it again: graphics does not equal number of instructions per pixel. It's obvious man-years of artist time went into UT2k4; this 96k game, while being technically impressive, honestly doesn't look very impressive graphically.

[spank]

People seem to forget the difference between graphics and artwork. The latter is more important. Just look at Warcraft 3 for example. Is there a prettier game than that?

[Fredrik]

Yes.

[Sharessa]

spank said:

Is there a prettier game than that?

World of Warcraft is.

[-Jk-]

I still like Diablo II. That is some nice artwork.

[Fletcher`]

doesnt work. gay