fraggle Posted February 10, 2005 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4252795.stm Prince Charles will marry his long-term partner Camilla Parker Bowles on 8 April, Clarence House says. A civil ceremony will be held at Windsor Castle. Mrs Parker Bowles will take the title HRH Duchess of Cornwall. When the Prince of Wales, 56, becomes King, 57-year-old Camilla will not be known as Queen Camilla but as the Princess Consort, Clarence House added. 0 Share this post Link to post
Janderson Posted February 10, 2005 Gross.... .....just, gross. Wow, looks like everyone in the upper-class are 'utterly delighted.' Why can't she just be known as his significant other? I hope my wedding makes the papers. 0 Share this post Link to post
Szymanski Posted February 10, 2005 When the Prince of Wales, 56, becomes King LOL, not gonna happen 0 Share this post Link to post
Enjay Posted February 10, 2005 I actually don't understand why people find this interesting enough for it to be headline news all over the place. All sorts of far more important things happened all over the world today. This is an absolute irrelevance as far as I'm concerned. 0 Share this post Link to post
TheDarkArchon Posted February 10, 2005 I just don't get it why people make a big fuss whenever Charles andd Camilla even hint at marridge. Most of the media go "OMG CHARLES THE MOTHERFUCKING MARRIDGE WRECKING BASTARD IS INTENDING TO MARRY THAT BITCH CAMILLA. IT MUST NOT HAPPEN SINCE IT IS AMORAL AND STUFF" then a lot of people jump on that shit-stirring bandwagon. 0 Share this post Link to post
Enjay Posted February 10, 2005 TheDarkArchon said:Most of the media go "OMG CHARLES THE MOTHERFUCKING MARRIDGE WRECKING BASTARD IS INTENDING TO MARRY THAT BITCH CAMILLA. IT MUST NOT HAPPEN SINCE IT IS AMORAL AND STUFF" And of course the people saying these things are such paragons of virtue themselves. 0 Share this post Link to post
TheDarkArchon Posted February 10, 2005 Further reason why it pisses me off. Then again, them the media has always been full of hypocrites. (The same goes for politicians but that's another subject) 0 Share this post Link to post
Alboroto Posted February 10, 2005 Anyway, why do we still have royal families??? He can marry Michael Jackson for what I care... 0 Share this post Link to post
Alboroto Posted February 10, 2005 Then why don't they build somekind of Royal Zoo, where you can see them and feed them. 0 Share this post Link to post
Enjay Posted February 10, 2005 TheDarkArchon said:Becuase tourists like them. God save the queen 'Cos tourists are money Sex Pistols "God Save the Queen" - 1977 Alboroto said:Then why don't they build somekind of Royal Zoo, where you can see them and feed them. ROFL 0 Share this post Link to post
Janderson Posted February 10, 2005 Alboroto said:Then why don't they build somekind of Royal Zoo, where you can see them and feed them. Buckingham Palace? It seems to me that the Royal Family serve as a kind of British 'The Osbournes.' We watch figures of apparent status humiliate and embarace themselves as cameras pry into their everyday lives. 0 Share this post Link to post
Alboroto Posted February 10, 2005 This week at Buckingham Palace Live! See prince Harry wear a nazy thong and then say: "It was a poor choice of underwear..." See the Queen impersonating a raisin. Oh wait, she's naked! 0 Share this post Link to post
Naked Snake Posted February 11, 2005 Blearg, he went from Diana to THAT? 0 Share this post Link to post
Submerge Posted February 11, 2005 Alboroto said:Then why don't they build somekind of Royal Zoo, where you can see them and feed them. Alboroto is officially awesome, in my book. But then again my book is scribbled with crayon 0 Share this post Link to post
wildweasel Posted February 11, 2005 Alboroto, that is the funniest thing I've read all night. Have a lemon square. 0 Share this post Link to post
Enjay Posted February 11, 2005 BBG said:Blearg, he went from Diana to THAT? Well, she probably looks quite a bit better than Diana does now. Hmmm, I dunno though. :? 0 Share this post Link to post
TheDarkArchon Posted February 11, 2005 Them Royals always had dodgy taste... 0 Share this post Link to post
Infinite Ammunition Posted February 11, 2005 Alboroto said:Then why don't they build somekind of Royal Zoo, where you can see them and feed them. only problem with that is everyone would just feed them jizz 0 Share this post Link to post
Alboroto Posted February 11, 2005 Thanks for the comment Submerge, that made me feel kinda good... 0 Share this post Link to post
TheDarkArchon Posted February 11, 2005 Infinite Ammunition said:only problem with that is everyone would just feed them jizz It wasn't a problem last time I checked. 0 Share this post Link to post
deathbringer Posted February 12, 2005 To quote someone on the UKIP forum: "Drop the Monarchy? From what height?" 0 Share this post Link to post
Infinite Ammunition Posted February 12, 2005 TheDarkArchon said:It wasn't a problem last time I checked. IT IS NOW 0 Share this post Link to post
skadoomer Posted February 12, 2005 BBG said:Blearg, he went from Diana to THAT? That woman is circus freak ugly. Diana must be rolling in her grave. 0 Share this post Link to post
Relica Religia Posted February 12, 2005 Fuck, who cares about this sort of thing? Giving any kind of a damn about royalty in the 21st. century is just pointless anyway. 0 Share this post Link to post
pilottobombadier Posted February 12, 2005 fraggle said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4252795.stm Seen it, whoop-dee-fuckin-dooed it :P 0 Share this post Link to post
darknation Posted February 16, 2005 she's too fucking ugly to be a princess seriously. I'd barf all over the bank if they tried to give me money with that ugly horse's face on it. 0 Share this post Link to post