Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Kid Airbag

This guy in Maine killed a dude

Recommended Posts

You killed someone?

I've got your IP... I'm contacting the cops!

Share this post


Link to post

"I think the only people who should access to the registry are the police," Stephenson said. "I don't think that the public should have access to it."

Sounds like a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
myk said:

Sounds like a good idea.

Better idea is to just get rid of it entirely.

Share this post


Link to post

So this guy is essentially being a vigilante?

Well, I would have prefered this guy to kill notorious murderers and bank robbers, but killing guys because they had sex with a minor? Hmm... Well, these kinds of guys ARE considered scum of the earth...

Share this post


Link to post

I'm glad they have these registeries in place... People need to be armed with information, especially if they have children close by. Even if it doesn't stop the majority of crimes from happening, any victomization that can be deterred makes it worth having it available. Though I don't advocate murder, I won't be shedding any tears to see a few of these monsters no longer around to hurt anyone else.

Share this post


Link to post
fodders said:

Sounds like a good start.

Right, what we really need, what would keep our children safe and sound, is a registry of all felons. Wouldn't want to unknowingly live next to a car theif, arsonist or burglar would we? Sure, they may have commited those crimes long ago, but you can never be too safe. Also, make it so they cannot dwell within 1000ft or so from public property and distribute their mugshots and profile whenever and whereever they chose to live. That might not be good enough though. Maybe in the future add all misdemeanor offenders on there for good measure.

Last but not least, we should continue to turn a blind eye toward and give (not so) silent approval of vigilantism.

Share this post


Link to post
Scabbed Angel said:

I'm glad they have these registeries in place... People need to be armed with information, especially if they have children close by. Even if it doesn't stop the majority of crimes from happening, any victomization that can be deterred makes it worth having it available. Though I don't advocate murder, I won't be shedding any tears to see a few of these monsters no longer around to hurt anyone else.


Yeah this guy had sex with his 16-year-old girlfriend when he was 19. I mean how depraved can you get.


It's absolutely ridiculous that this guy was a registered sex offender and his personal information was accessible to any nutjob who wanted to go on some personal mission of justice.


And yeah it did kind of hit close to home for me because if my ex's parents had caught me with my dick out just once I'd probably be on this list too, but come on, you can't not see something wrong with this picture.

Share this post


Link to post

Quast said:
Better idea is to just get rid of it entirely.

I can see how there could well be abuse from law agencies as well; not so much as what happened here, but as pressures on the "offender." Though it might depend on the case (since in a way keeping track of an offender can be equated to being on parole), but in any case if the individual is exposed, as these people who were killed, the State, law agencies involved, and any other responsibles, a liable for anything that happens to such people in such a context.

Share this post


Link to post
myk said:

I can see how there could well be abuse from law agencies as well

That isn't what I meant so much although you bring up good points (except the state liability thing).

It's not about who has access to it, but why it exists in the first place. Why create a list of a very broad scope of certain criminals and not others?

Share this post


Link to post

Quast said:
Why create a list of a very broad scope of certain criminals and not others?

It appears to be the practice of applying more or less barbaric (or reactionary) measures on misbehavior deemed "irrational", heightened by the defense of the idea of property (in both this and against "terrorism".) Sexual offense is an attack on "the family" like terrorism is an attack on "the nation".

Share this post


Link to post

while the sex offender list used to be helpful, it's becoming retarded with petty crimes like "downloading child porn".. I know that's pretty fucking low but.. is it worth ruining someone's life because of it? it's not the same as say, a rapist, but they get treated the same. fucking sad.

Share this post


Link to post

Kid Airbag said:
Yeah this guy had sex with his 16-year-old girlfriend when he was 19. I mean how depraved can you get.

what's the age of consent over there?

Share this post


Link to post
Captain Red said:

what's the age of consent over there?


Who cares. If it's not 16, it certainly should be, and some states have a 3-year safety cushion anyway.

A guy still shouldn't die for having consentual sex with his girlfriend because some idiot saw his name on a list of registered "sex offenders."

Share this post


Link to post
Kid Airbag said:

Who cares. If it's not 16, it certainly should be, and some states have a 3-year safety cushion anyway.

A guy still shouldn't die for having consentual sex with his girlfriend because some idiot saw his name on a list of registered "sex offenders."


Well, now that you say he's having consentual sex with his girlfriend... That guy shouldn't have been killed for that.

Share this post


Link to post

Intresting, giving the controversy in the past about the reverse (The public NOT being able to access the register) being in effect here (UK) every time deaths caused by known (and registered) sex offenders.

Share this post


Link to post

I've got a buddy who's living with his girlfriend that he had "relations" with when he was 18 and she was 15. He's now like . . . 23 or something, and as far I can tell there wasn't any harm done, even though I get the feeling that it's generally frowned upon anyway.

Share this post


Link to post

If your information goes into a database because your a pedophile, fair game I say. It's unfortunate this dude himself ended up as a convicted sex offender. But since his girlfriend was still a minor, her parents have the decision in the issue.

They clearly didn't want her fucking him. He could've waited till she was 18. If he couldn't wait, then she wouldn't be worth waiting for at all. The guy is clearly an unfortunate what should be an exception to rule.

But hell, if some physcho wants to rub out an old perverted pedophile, why not let him? Dead pedophile, righteous nutball feels his jail time is justified, Everyone's happy.

Share this post


Link to post
POTGIESSER said:

If your information goes into a database because your a pedophile, fair game I say.

But hell, if some physcho wants to rub out an old perverted pedophile, why not let him? Dead pedophile, righteous nutball feels his jail time is justified, Everyone's happy.

pedophilia is not a crime

Share this post


Link to post

In some areas women can be charged and listed as sex offenders for going topless or for simply owning sex toys. How messed up is that?

Share this post


Link to post

Now that I think about it, I remember a guy who was 19 who was friends with this girl who was like 14 or 15 or something, and she wanted to have sex with him, but he kept telling her no.
Then one time he got really really drunk at some party and went into his room and passed out. She then proceeded to ride his cock like a horse to the next town and just after she got up and left his other friend, another female, came in and said "what did you just do?" He woke up and looked up at her and said "what?" because he had no idea what happened.
Under current law I'll bet you that he could have gone to jail or had been convicted as a sex offender even though he was basically raped.

Share this post


Link to post
Piezo said:

Now that I think about it, I remember a guy who was 19 who was friends with this girl who was like 14 or 15 or something, and she wanted to have sex with him, but he kept telling her no.
Then one time he got really really drunk at some party and went into his room and passed out. She then proceeded to ride his cock like a horse to the next town and just after she got up and left his other friend, another female, came in and said "what did you just do?" He woke up and looked up at her and said "what?" because he had no idea what happened.
Under current law I'll bet you that he could have gone to jail or had been convicted as a sex offender even though he was basically raped.


Sorta but maybe not. It'd be a tough case to prove but if he could prove intoxication to that point, and there is no statute preventing it, SHE could be charged with rape. Some states have no laws about female on male and female on female rape, they are merely called "sexual assault".

Share this post


Link to post

Gaylen Spladd said:
Sorta but maybe not. It'd be a tough case to prove but if he could prove intoxication to that point, and there is no statute preventing it, SHE could be charged with rape. Some states have no laws about female on male and female on female rape, they are merely called "sexual assault".

He's saying that he could have been accused of "abusing" a minor by her parents, or by herself. Without witnesses or elements that prove otherwise evidence of sex between them pretty much makes him a sexual offender.

Share this post


Link to post

I think in some town there's actually a law on the books that technically makes it illegal to even have consensual sex with your wife (or anyone). If anyone was actually arrested for that they would qualify to get listed as well. Megan's Law really includes some messed up stealth legislation by the religious right.

Share this post


Link to post

When I made that comment I really should have said "in this country" in place of "under current law." Since the law defines rape pretty plainly even though the girl's parents could ruin his life over something he didn't have any control over.

Share this post


Link to post

a kid at my high school had to register as a local sex offender for getting head from his 14-year-old girlfriend. he severed ties a little while later and she went to the authorities as vengeance.

these laws are really pretty ridiculous. an ex-con kiddie fiddler has served his debt to society. he deserves the right to deal with his past in the way he chooses, without such blatant invasions of his privacy. i would prefer the state have no business in crime prevention, especially if it means setting negative precedents like megan's law. and i'm sorry, but naming bills after crime victims is so underhanded.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×