sargebaldy Posted May 28, 2006 So scientists are now saying that the egg came before the chicken. I don't understand why scientists would actually have to research this, because they seem to be simply stating the obvious. I mean, who actually thought it was the chicken? Everyone knows that evolution is a form of genetic mutation, and occurs intergenerationally. Like, which makes more sense: 1. A predecessor of the chicken lays an egg with a mutated embryo we now call the chicken 2. A predecessor of the chicken wakes up one morning magically transformed into a chicken Unless, of course, evolution is a lie and chickens just came magically into being. So maybe the whole "chicken vs. the egg" debate was actually just a metaphor for "creationism vs. evolution". 0 Share this post Link to post
Fredrik Posted May 28, 2006 They didn't "research" anything; they debated it. The debate was sponsored by Disney to promote the movie Chicken Little. Go figure. 0 Share this post Link to post
sargebaldy Posted May 28, 2006 Oh, well maybe I should have bothered reading the article. But everyone knows that the best ideas come at the whims of Disney. And apparently it was a pretty lousy debate if everyone agreed with one another. 0 Share this post Link to post