TimeOfDeath Posted April 21, 2012 I was actually watching that channel 10 minutes after it happened, so I missed the gay porn. :( I was eating breakfast and the news guy said "CHCH would like to sincerely apologize for the inappropriate content that aired at 9:30am. It was aired by someone outside of CHCH and we are investigating it now", so I was like oh shit I missed something good. 0 Share this post Link to post
Aliotroph? Posted April 21, 2012 I find it hilarious. I wish it happened more often. People don't deserve to be sheltered. Also, The Daily Mail is a trash paper. Let's have a different link. 0 Share this post Link to post
GreyGhost Posted April 21, 2012 Super Bowl attracts a much larger audience, so obviously anything that happens there is more significant. 0 Share this post Link to post
Technician Posted April 21, 2012 I missed it. I didn't need to be up early, sadly. I rarely watch the morning new, anyway. 0 Share this post Link to post
DoomUK Posted April 21, 2012 I thought TV networks had some kind of panic button which cuts the broadcast in the event of something like this happening? Apparently they don't, so maybe they should think about setting one up. Not that it's that terrible and shocking, when the news could be reporting the real horrors going on in the world in the first place. But children don't need to be inadvertently exposed to that kind of thing. 0 Share this post Link to post
Doom_Dude Posted April 21, 2012 Haha, this is pretty damned funny. I missed it too but I rarely watch TV. 0 Share this post Link to post
GreyGhost Posted April 21, 2012 DoomUK said:I thought TV networks had some kind of panic button which cuts the broadcast in the event of something like this happening? Apparently they don't, so maybe they should think about setting one up. Probably wouldn't have helped them, looks like the news feed was interfered with after it had left the station. "The station blamed the mixup on a switching error at one of the cable companies that picks up its signal." 0 Share this post Link to post
geo Posted April 21, 2012 Or when the Flintstones on Cartoon Network had 30 seconds of uninterrupted porn sex from Spice network in the late 90s. 0 Share this post Link to post
Fletcher` Posted April 21, 2012 of course this was in related links. go go gadget daily mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2132342/How-internet-porn-turned-beautiful-boy-hollow-self-hating-shell.html 0 Share this post Link to post
AndrewB Posted April 21, 2012 rf` said:of course this was in related links. go go gadget daily mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2132342/How-internet-porn-turned-beautiful-boy-hollow-self-hating-shell.html I still can't comprehend how so much of the world can be this stupid. My brain actually feels like it's melting right now. 0 Share this post Link to post
Eponasoft Posted April 21, 2012 rf` said:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2132342/How-internet-porn-turned-beautiful-boy-hollow-self-hating-shell.html What a stupid article... more blame-shifting from inept parents too fucking lazy to do their job. 0 Share this post Link to post
Belial Posted April 21, 2012 My mom gave me one of dads porn mags when I was 12. Now I'm a sex fiend. Also, nipples are evil. 0 Share this post Link to post
Krispy Posted April 21, 2012 Belial said:My mom gave me one of dads porn mags when I was 12. Awkwardness. I just stole them. 0 Share this post Link to post
Technician Posted April 21, 2012 Ironically, the parents that crusade against "internet perversion" are the same idiots that support "smaller government" and are "anti-nanny state." It also doesn't help that most of these idiot mother don't know anything beyond missionary. 0 Share this post Link to post
PRIMEVAL Posted April 21, 2012 Wardrobe malfunction since it happened to a well known celebrity and Lord knows we'll never hear the end of anything a celeb does. 0 Share this post Link to post
Eponasoft Posted April 21, 2012 Technician said:Ironically, the parents that crusade against "internet perversion" are the same idiots that support "smaller government" and are "anti-nanny state." Sort of like how the same people who whine about Playboy's "exploitation of women" are the first in line to see a Chippendales show? Technician said:It also doesn't help that most of these idiot mother don't know anything beyond missionary. You know, I think that that's half the reason why they don't like internet porn... they're in danger of learning that their own sex lives are pathetic. 0 Share this post Link to post
AndrewB Posted April 22, 2012 Technician said:Ironically, the parents that crusade against "internet perversion" are the same idiots that support "smaller government" and are "anti-nanny state."There are many people that have no problem with "internet perversion" and still support smaller government and are against nanny states. 0 Share this post Link to post
Revved Posted April 22, 2012 This seems really funny to me since I live around the area that station airs, but I never saw it because I was away.... 0 Share this post Link to post
Eponasoft Posted April 22, 2012 I'm all for internet perversion, am anti-nanny-state, and don't care if the government is large or small as long as it's efficient and does what we put those bozos into office for. 0 Share this post Link to post
DuckReconMajor Posted April 22, 2012 I think he put "smaller government" in quotes for a reason. I don't think he thinks they really want smaller government. 0 Share this post Link to post
Eponasoft Posted April 22, 2012 No, these people really do want "smaller government" because that's what their political leaders tell them. What they don't tell them is what "smaller government" ends up meaning... it doesn't mean that they're going to cut out any top executive or legislative positions, it means that they're going to cut lower-level government positions... utilitarians, teachers, social workers, etc... gnawing at the bones rather than trimming the fat. It happened here in PR back when our current governor was elected... he was all like "we're gonna shrink the government!" and what'd he do? Cut almost 17000 civilian jobs. A lot of teachers lost their jobs... and this place is already hurting education-wise. When the GOP talking heads speak about "smaller government", they're talking about cutting out the things that they don't like... cutting jobs for social services, government-funded scientific researchers, stuff like that. They never say something like "we're going to clean up the mangled mess that is the DoD" or "look at all these wasteful defense contracts in foreign countries that are doing our people no good, let's get rid of them". And don't get me started on "job creation"... it's all about the womb police, never about "well shit, our country's infrastructure is thirty years behind the rest of the industrialized world, time to upgrade". 0 Share this post Link to post
eargosedown Posted April 22, 2012 Was it the kind of gay porn where they eat the poo poo? 0 Share this post Link to post
AndrewB Posted April 24, 2012 DuckReconMajor said:I think he put "smaller government" in quotes for a reason. I don't think he thinks they really want smaller government. There isn't a major political party in existence that wants smaller government. Any party that's in power wants to play Santa Claus, and the only way they can do that is by increasing government spending. 0 Share this post Link to post
SaladBadger Posted April 25, 2012 I find it rather amusing that almost every instance of this happening, the footage is pornographic in nature. I don't want to start a conspiracy of some sort, but it just does seem a bit weird to me. Either that or these are the only instances of it you hear about. I'm assuming it's likely this. 0 Share this post Link to post
Xaser Posted April 25, 2012 Shaikoten said:*Max Headroom pirate* Gourddamnit. You beat me to it. You dastard. D: 0 Share this post Link to post
DuckReconMajor Posted April 25, 2012 InsanityBringer said:I find it rather amusing that almost every instance of this happening, the footage is pornographic in nature. I don't want to start a conspiracy of some sort, but it just does seem a bit weird to me.I assume it's because it's the traditional "shock" footage you put up when you want to cause a disturbance. Unless I'm reading your post wrong and you're just being silly. 0 Share this post Link to post