zzz Posted May 12, 2002 http://developer.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=pp_Lighting_ogl download bumpmapping and pixel lighting demo from nvidia's site, i got 30 fps with my GeForce2ti 0 Share this post Link to post
Fredrik Posted May 12, 2002 Damn, there goes my hope of playing Doom III on this card :( 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted May 12, 2002 You can probably still play it - just not with great graphics. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lord FlatHead Posted May 13, 2002 Calling this demo "Doom 3 graphics" is an insult to Doom 3. 0 Share this post Link to post
mmnpsrsoskl Posted May 14, 2002 FlatHead said:Calling this demo "Doom 3 graphics" is an insult to Doom 3. Calling this anything is beyond stupid. 0 Share this post Link to post
Naked Snake Posted May 14, 2002 I don't need no stinkin' test thingy! I already know that my GeForce 4 ti 4600 with 128 ram is gonna kick some ass. I bought it just for Doom 3....well...my dad bought it for me...same thing... 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted May 14, 2002 bigbadgangsta said:I don't need no stinkin' test thingy! I already know that my GeForce 4 ti 4600 with 128 ram is gonna kick some ass. I bought it just for Doom 3....well...my dad bought it for me...same thing... Hm, Carmack once said that the GeForce 3 would run Doom 3 better than the GeForce 4. Besides, it would've been a lot smarter if you waited until Doom 3 went gold and then purchased a "GeForce 5" (or equivalent) for it, 'cause the GeForce 4 wont allow you to run Doom 3 smoothly with the really cool features turned on. 0 Share this post Link to post
zzz Posted May 14, 2002 no no, Geforce4 MX sux like my gf2 titanium , not 4600 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted May 14, 2002 zzz said:no no, Geforce4 MX sux like my gf2 titanium , not 4600 Hm, did I miss something? 0 Share this post Link to post
Zaldron Posted May 14, 2002 Yes. The GeForce 4 beats the crap out of the GF3. The GF4 MX sucks. 0 Share this post Link to post
Dark-tenshi Posted May 14, 2002 /awaiting for new card to run DOOM3 like dream. 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted May 14, 2002 When did the "real" GeForce 4 come out? The last thing I remember to come out of Nvidia was the GeForce 4 MX. Oh well, I'd still wait until Doom 3 comes out before I buy a new card - buying the newest and best NOW is a great way to get rid of a lot of your money, when you can buy a card which is well able to run Doom 3 at high settings at a lower price when the game is out. 0 Share this post Link to post
zzz Posted May 14, 2002 geforce4 MX is worst shit of Geforce4 series the best of geforce4 series is Geforce4ti 4600 0 Share this post Link to post
Weedster Posted May 14, 2002 Hey guys, wanna feel DooM 3 graphics?Then look at some damn screenshots :P, if you're like me and have a cheap POS of a computer, that is. 0 Share this post Link to post
nxn Posted May 15, 2002 freaking fucking FLUCK i WAS GOING TO HAVE THAT ONE!!! 0 Share this post Link to post
Amanichen Posted May 15, 2002 dsm said:When did the "real" GeForce 4 come out? You're a few months behind. They came out in January. DirectX 8.1 / OpenGL 1.3: GF4 Ti4600 GF4 Ti4400 GF4 Ti4200 DirectX 7.0 / OpenGL 1.2 (Limited OpenGL 1.3 functions): GF4 MX460 (planned, but as of yet unreleased) GF4 MX440 GF4 MX420 The MX models of the GF4 are significantly slower and less capable than the Ti series. It's not to say that they're slow (even the MX 440 rips a new asshole in a GF2 Ultra and a GF3 Ti200 in DirectX 7 stuff) but they lack hardware vertex and pixel shaders that are required to run the neato features in DX 8.0+ and OpenGL 1.3 apps. 0 Share this post Link to post
Weedster Posted May 15, 2002 orion said:freaking fucking FLUCK i WAS GOING TO HAVE THAT ONE!!! You must be high(per), buddy boy ;) 0 Share this post Link to post
dark santaclaus Posted May 16, 2002 i heard once that the geforce4 was worst for doom 3 than the geforce 3 ti500, but then i heard that the geforce 4 4600 is the same as the ge force 3 ti 500 plus the tv in and out, and the speed a little bit 0 Share this post Link to post
Burzum Posted May 16, 2002 If you own a GF3 it would be complete stupid to buy a GF4. The performance isnt that much faster as it could be a reason to buy a GF4. But lets wait and c what we will get in autum. 3D Labs have a great new graphic technologie researched. The first cards (not for sale) reached the double filltrate (!) of a GF4 with much cheaper RAM on board. And you can code EVERYTHING on this chip :) Its FULL programmable, so you can create whatever you want. But read more here... http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1614 0 Share this post Link to post
Amanichen Posted May 19, 2002 Burzum said: If you own a GF3 it would be complete stupid to buy a GF4. True. Burzum said: The performance isnt that much faster as it could be a reason to buy a GF4. False. Even the low end Ti model, the GF4 Ti4200, is faster than the GF3 Ti500. The Ti500 debuted with a $500 MSRP. The Ti4200 is around $200. Did I mention you also get faster AA, dual monitor support, and much improved image quality (this actually has to do with the VGA filters that the card manufacturers put on the graphics cards, not NVIDIA's processor.) 0 Share this post Link to post
nxn Posted May 19, 2002 Weedster said:You must be high(per), buddy boy ;) I don't want to talk aobut it. 0 Share this post Link to post