Guest Duke Nukem Posted July 17, 2000 Hey Julian, instead of using Boom for RORDoom why dont you use Zdoom? Im sure it wouldnt be that hard although i dont know crap about codes. Just think about it, cuz alot of people use Zdoom more than Boom today. 0 Share this post Link to post
boris Posted July 17, 2000 I'm not sure about this, but I think I once said that he uses BooM because many other ports are based on it, and so it should be easier to implement rorDooM in other ports. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted July 17, 2000 Because ZDoom is sssslllloooowwww. Doing it for Boom makes it easy to copy the rorDoom features into anything else based off Boom, including ZDoom, although I would much rather see this feature in MBF first. 0 Share this post Link to post
Jon Posted July 17, 2000 NO GOD PLEASE NO The whole thing about rordoom is that its done by someone who believes in fast, clean open source code, like aurikan and the #doomroom 'clique', and zdoom goes totally against that ideal. Also boom == C, zdoom == C++ 0 Share this post Link to post
Julian Posted July 18, 2000 boris said:I'm not sure about this, but I think I once said that he uses BooM because many other ports are based on it, and so it should be easier to implement rorDooM in other ports. That's exactly why I work on the Boom source... I've taken a look at SMMU and MBF, and I think it will be easy to add ror support in them. I've also talked with Randy and he seemed interested in ror support for ZDoom, tho I think EDGE node support was in project (but I dunno really). Don't see rorDoom as a real port, it's rather an experimental piece of software usable for other coders. That explains the use of Boom I think. 0 Share this post Link to post
