Windowpain Posted April 6, 2001 because the idea is to kill the demons without killing all of the people too. 0 Share this post Link to post
Zaldron Posted April 6, 2001 A nuke would put in evidence the lack of destructable enviroments. That´s a weapon more suited for games like Red Faction. Throwing one of those inside a locker, only to discover after the tremendous explosion that the thing´s just a little charred, well, makes the engine look so crap. 0 Share this post Link to post
kain Posted April 6, 2001 Windowpain said:because the idea is to kill the demons without killing all of the people too. damn are you guys fucking mind readers? i was going to put that if you where going to die, that there would be a nuke and the whole complex would blow up with you in it since you are half deada and you would still complete your mission, but that would be no room for a part 4. Hmmm Doom89 sounds good!! 0 Share this post Link to post
Speshul Eddy Posted April 7, 2001 Zaldron said:A nuke would put in evidence the lack of destructable enviroments. That´s a weapon more suited for games like Red Faction. Throwing one of those inside a locker, only to discover after the tremendous explosion that the thing´s just a little charred, well, makes the engine look so crap. yeah, I remember playing the Turok series and wondering why those incredibly destructive looking weapons caused so little...err, destruction(heck, the enemies didn't even gib). Of course, asking for destructible environments in an N64 game would be kind of absurd. 0 Share this post Link to post
Guest Clone999 Posted April 9, 2001 kain said:damn are you guys fucking mind readers? i was going to put that if you where going to die, that there would be a nuke and the whole complex would blow up with you in it since you are half deada and you would still complete your mission, but that would be no room for a part 4. Hmmm Doom89 sounds good!! There's always the idea of getting aniahlated in Doom3, then ending up back in hell in Doom4. That would be sweet. Besides, the good guy doesn't always have to win. I mean, you ARE fighting an immortal. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lengis Posted April 9, 2001 I agree, Nukes kick ass. Turok's nuke weapons looked great but they did shitty damage, I want REAL damage! Also the BFG should be in too. 0 Share this post Link to post
sirgalahadwizar Posted April 9, 2001 I think the BFG is effectivly a nuke in it's own right. If you are talking about a device that blows up if yuo dont disarm it, i dont agree - flynn can run away because this is somewhere else than earth and no collateral damage is to worry about. 0 Share this post Link to post
Guest TheEternalVile Posted April 9, 2001 Clone999 said:There's always the idea of getting aniahlated in Doom3, then ending up back in hell in Doom4. That would be sweet. Besides, the good guy doesn't always have to win. I mean, you ARE fighting an immortal. I haven't seen a decent Nuke in a game. Explosion is not good enough, no shockwave/emp, no radiation, etc. Just Fuck it. forget what i said. forget about nukes 0 Share this post Link to post