Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
DooM_RO

Why was my WAD rejected?

Recommended Posts

I uploaded a wad a week ago, got an e-mail, replied to it but it still got rejected. Why?

Share this post


Link to post

It was D3PRMEXS. I got the e-mail, replied to it but it still got rejected.

Share this post


Link to post

Wed Feb 28 20:54:02 EST 2018 Rejected D3PRMEXS.zip because: no response to verification email after 7 days.

Thu Mar 8 18:29:36 EST 2018 Rejected D3PRMEXS.zip because: no response to verification email after 7 days.

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)

going a little OT but what is these "unmodified ID software resources" that are been taken in consideration for the rejects?

 

Over than blatant copy/paste stuff from the original IWADS I don't have any clue about it...

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Memfis said:

Wed Feb 28 20:54:02 EST 2018 Rejected D3PRMEXS.zip because: no response to verification email after 7 days.

Thu Mar 8 18:29:36 EST 2018 Rejected D3PRMEXS.zip because: no response to verification email after 7 days.

 

I did reply the second time.

Share this post


Link to post

Try messaging Bloodshedder or The Green Herring, they should know more.

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, Walter confetti said:

going a little OT but what is these "unmodified ID software resources" that are been taken in consideration for the rejects?

 

Over than blatant copy/paste stuff from the original IWADS I don't have any clue about it...

That's exactly what it is. IWAD lumps that are byte-for-byte the same.

Share this post


Link to post

But I've seen WADs with IWAD resources included again and they are on idgames, like Ancient Aliens. Or do you have to be well established in the community for your copying to be overlooked?

Share this post


Link to post
Posted (edited)

Is it byte-for-byte, or is it palette altered? (see: BTSX)

Besides which, anybody well established wont be putting IWAD resources in their WAD without a technical purpose anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
17 hours ago, DooM_RO said:


 

I did reply the second time.

You didn't read the verification e-mail very closely.
 

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Bloodshedder said:

You didn't read the verification e-mail very closely.
 

 

Oh...well I feel stupid now.

Share this post


Link to post

What was the email asking for that you missed?

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×