MrHofmann

Cool

Alleged pedophile.

Forgot the question marks. Edited them in. That was after shit already hit the fan. What does any of that have to do with Dr. Disrispect vs The Internet. The two videos that I posted are the only ones that I watched from Asmongold You are free to leave If you don't give a shit, or are not having fun. :)

Like defending himself when accused of that shit. No? Bro, I'm not defending anyone. I'm just asking questions. You are correct. But we (the internet) should also ruin his life without any knowledge of wrongdoing because we can?

Honestly I don't know who that guy is. Or what's his story. I had heard of him though

That is correct. But what did he do wrong morally or legally? Texting a minor? Since when is that illegal or morally wrong? As I said "inappropriately" can mean anything. It could mean that he acted like a douche because that is his Dr. Disrespect character. You are filling in missing context as if you know what went on. He was even accused of trying to meet with the minor at TwitchCon. Like Twitch streamers don't communicate and meet with their underaged fans at TwitchCon.

Well then it should be innocent until proven guilty. Not the other way around. But that's how the Internet works I guess.

So many people with lack of critical thinking or reading comprehension. First of all his statement was "leaning towards inappropriate" and "inappropriately" does not necessarily mean sexual content. It could mean anything. An investigation was conducted, no wrongdoing was found, no criminal charges brought despite the "evidence" twitch had. Apologist? The guy wasn't even charged let alone convicted of a crime.

Why? He wasn't charged or convicted. He was reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. An investigation was conducted and no wrongdoing was found. This is exactly the problem I was trying to point out. Everyone is so eager to throw the man in jail based on hearsay. Like the entire Internet agreed that he is a guilty predator pedophile despite that no charges had been brought against him. I don't get it.

Not a fan of the guy, but this story caught my attention. I think there is more to it than everyone thinks they know. This is his last tweet on the issue: https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1805668256088572089 In my opinion Asmongold has the fairest take on the matter: What do you guys think?

CREATE A FUCKING SUB FFS. Please

Metroid Prime?

Yes, you are wrong, but I understand why it might seem that way. It is not hypocritical because I'm not saying that I don't give shit and then post lengthy responses and neither am a moderator so I can't delete the thread. Also, my stance is neutral so my contribution to this shit is minimal. My criticism is aimed only at the community with the goal of reducing the division. I like Doomworld, I want it to remain peaceful.

Maybe I have expressed myself poorly, English is not my native language. But I hope you get most of the points I am trying to make. I was only trying to shift the blame away from Marty a bit because the entire internet seems to be biased against him, because evil corporation bad by default. Also, I was trying to show that given the facts and lack of evidence you can make the case against Mick as well and therefore conclude that you can't really blame either Mick or Marty. But apparently the majority of the internet didn't even look critically at Mick's "evidence", the term they are all using is 14000 word (or whatever the number is) article, as if the length of the article in terms of number of words is some sort of metric for reliability. These people are tearing the community apart and should be called out. This is how you make developers not listen to the community anymore. No wonder games are cash grabbing shit and people don't get what they want for some time now. Also, influential people (e.g. youtubers) should learn to take the blame for the shit they are causing and learn to take some responsibility because they are influencing a lot of people. Instead they are the ones who immediately pick "sides" because they want to align themselves with the popular opinion so they don't ruin their stats on the platform. It is true that Mick's comments cannot be classified as incitement, but you cannot deny the fact that they caused the initial shitstorm aimed at id. Of course I don't blame him for that. How could have he predicted the shit it caused? Tough I suspect he was fine with it because he did nothing to address the issue and at least try to fix shit. A simple "guys chill out, stop harassing Chad" would be enough and would certainly not be considered as breaching NDA. Just because Mick's actions were not malicious it does not mean that their consequences didn't happen. And if it affected id the way Marty said, then Marty did in fact respond appropriately. Yes, this is his stance after his response, which was not that clear before he was called out. Again, I'm not arguing whether Mick is innocent or not, but only that Marty's actions are completely justified. But at the same time I understand why the majority can't seem to understand that. They are missing important details in the events of the entire situation, either intentionally or unintentionally, because of their bias towards Mick. As far as I'm concerned, this entire thread can be purged. Nobody gains anything from this. It only contributes to the shitshow.

Some facts: 1. Marty's response was not a shitstorm and was not an attack on Mick. It was a thoughtfully and comprehensively written letter for the community. 2. The letter was not a response to Mick's comments, but an attempt to calm the community for giving Chad and the rest of id a hard time because of Mick's comments. 3. It is not either Mick's or Marty's fault this shit happened. It is the community's fault for overreacting. 5. There are no sides. We are all on the same side.