Teabλg_Johnson

with things like this, i'm unsure. i do see alot of posts being "clever" with the way you insult someone, but i think the occasional FUCK is acceptable atleast. or should be

anything. even using a slur, with pure sarcastic background and in friendly tone, is considered trouble. all thanks to a little reality intruding on them.

more ppl = more casualties. more population density = more casualties. more ppl + more density = casualties^2. is this clear enough? or do i need to steep lower to explain simple things yknow it was never intended to be one, yeah? if it was, i'm sure talking about my skeleton penis isn't an argument either that's the kind of optimism i want to see

No. maybe

1) he never said any of this 2) there's no source on how aggressive asian giant hornets are; and their nests are identifiable 3) you're blind if you can't see their nests nothing remotely "goalshifting". the reason why china had ""high"" casualties is because it's super dense country, especially in the north, central and eastern regions. seattle and vancouver don't compare to this the "entire country" had significantly lower casualties and injuries, and they even had some dense areas but not to the extent of china also, if you plan on arguing, try speaking like a human. it shouldn't be much of an offer flamethrowers r 4 pussies. i don't cheat like that

..your own source Li Jiuzhou, deputy director of the Shaanxi Bee and Wasp Industry Association, said that hundreds or even thousands of hornets could live in a single nest. They attack humans only if disturbed, he added. But they are carnivorous and can quickly destroy bee colonies. it isn't that hard to realize china's demographics and setting. condensed population would mean more casualties and injured. the "most affected areas" according to your source are all dense.

is this another cliche rhetoric that adds nothing to conversations

not only are the fatalities (even more) miniscule, but to add more salt you need a buttload of stings AND you have to purposefully disturb them in order for them to attack you. even with such large numbers, i don't think this is anything worth panicking about. as i said, it happens often

if hornets attack me, i'll assure you i'll film my process of eliminating each and every single one of them. i promise you this

it shouldn't exist. it only further divides the people and the state, something libertarians jerk off to. a unity creates productivity, and productivity leads to our common goals. not only does free speech divides the people, but it also means the freedom of false speech roaming; limiting it would result in limiting free speech alone. libertarians are stuck in their shallow beliefs that they can better the state, and people can live in harmony if the state somehow doesn't exist (to some extent, obviously)

i'd see me some papers about this i can club the shit out of every single hornet if they come in my way. there's no point in living if you can't fight something that's smaller than your "left nut", dude

it'd be pretty embarrassing knowing you somehow, some way, in this world, you died to something that is weak and effectively harmless. unless you're an old person that is the reason why shark attacks are low because sharks don't usually swim to coasts, but that doesn't make sharks any less dangerous/incapable. bad analogy

anecdotal of a man with no balls somehow signifies the end of the world?

why are people crying apocalypse? it's literally fucking hornets. as if hornet waves don't happen in the united states during breeding seasons

it's just a little criticism here and there, and in a pandemic you certainly don't have a choice either