Sir Blastalot

The game I hated the most would have to be...Earth 2150. It had the potential to be allow tremendus replay value, and it came out sucking. Other than that (and maybe the SNES version of DOOM), all the other games I have played are ok. Some are great, but none have any true originality anymore. I want something new and chock-full of goddies, not something that we've seen 12,495.5 times in a row. O yeah, lets not even mention the game Postal 2...that one sucks more than thirty whores working 24/7 for six weeks!

I dont like the Hellknights scream either...they left the ending part (with the low growl) but the shriek sucks. I want something that sounds bigger and meaner than me. However, I do think that it would be cool if the Hellknight screamed like that when you killed him...that would, as Cartman would say, KICKASS!

**wonders if this is the first time in the doomworld forums history that someone has made 3 threads, one on top of the other...** Anyway, to answer your question, I would give the guy an arm that is basicaly a hand-turned-into-biting-thing-of-death type of thing. Basicaly, you smash it into your opponent, and it bites them to death. That simple...that goory...and that much FUN!

1)Max Payne (Jack Slate = jackass) 2)Tom Vercetti 3)Master Cheif 4)Snake 5)007 6)Bloodrayne

I just LLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEE those ambient sounds. Espicially that wierd, beast-like noise that apparently is the sound of the HK (makes me think of a supermutant-evil T-rex...on a good day). But, alas, I tried going on ua-corp.com, but it appears the site is experiencing "technical difficulties."

Might wanna add the 5th Dark Tower book, me friend. Its come out on hardback just a few days ago, so hope to get the softback soon, as I wish I could get. Anyway, my wishlist goes like this: -Newest gaming compuer I can afford (I hope I win some sort of contest) -Alot of CDs -Alot of cool FPS Games -Alot of Stephen King stuff -A good bass guitar w/amp -A gf -Some mojo and coolness -and some good old fashioned RTS Games Yeah, my list is short...but I did forget the XBox...and Halo...and other stuff unmentionable...

What I wanna know is: Why, after knowing what a Cybie can do, does the box art of D2 suggest fighting the Cybie off with a shotgun? Or even the slighest notion that it's a good idea to fight the Cybie with anything weaker than a "Plasma Gun/Rocket Launcher/and, Hell, maybe even a Chaingun" combo?

Damn. I stand corrected :( There's a lesson to be learnt today---Stupidity shows worse than an orange tan. Anyway, I really think there should'nt be a name for the Dooguy. Hell, I know no-one who's had a problem with it before, so why change it now?

Um, that would be first person. 3rd person is when you are playing as a character with a name and are not seeing from their pov. 2nd is when you are playing as a character with a name and you are seeing from their pov. 1st person is the exact same thing as 2nd, execpt the character has no name.

Damn skippy. BTW, I third that. So lets close this topic before the guys in white suits come and try to steal me away to their secret lab agian.

This is probably a better definition from the same webpage that Fredrik provided:

My favorite weapon is the incredible, edible chainsaw. Too bad there isn't a Sawrocket! Rocket Launcher + Chainsaw = SawRocket! Not only does it saw thorugh enemies, but after 2-3 seconds of sawing, it BLOWS UP! Anyway, their's just something about the chainsaw that's...satisfying. I mean, what could be better than making Demon-Spaghetti?

I agree. Society may pressure us, yes, and we may do it. But it's our decision. And who could forget the fact that we are society? Our decisions are like ripples in a pond: the world is the surface, and what we do changes the shape of it. We decide what society thinks is "hot" or "not". Anyway, getting back to the subject, I believe that God used evolution so that it would fit the scientific rules. All things are explainable-you just need enough information. However, I think that by limiting us into this level of exsistance (and therefore limiting us to the laws of science) caused us to gain the ability of free will. This was interpreted by the ones who wrote the Bible as the "Serpant," but it is nothing more than the restraints that God put in this universe so that it would function. And, to those who say He planned things, I doubt he would make a universe just for us if he didn't want other beings for us to share it with (it is the golden rule; do unto others as you want done unto you, aka meaning share!). I just think that because of this, there was an error that He could have changed, but I probablly would have meant the destruction of what was there. God loved what he made, and most likely didnt want to have to recreate all he made. Now, for something new. I have always wondered why God had to rest on the seventh day? Im sure creating a universe is tireing, but if he is perfect he would not have strained himself or done things to "tire" him out. And 2, He's God! It would be impossible for something (or someone) like Him to become tired. Dont like what I said? Post your complaint. Im just speaking my mind.

Im sorry. Its my fault for your misunderstanding of what I have said. What I meant to say was that I wouldnt just rip theories out of books and such and believe them wholeheartedly. I rather read alot of those books, then ponder about the things they bring up, the differences between them, and the similarites between them. Then I add my own ideas and thoughts to the mix, and then edit the new theory untill it is in it's final draft. Except im constantly editing it, adding new ideas, new thoughts. Just as everyone else in this disscussion should be.

Ouch. That was colder than a bologna sandwich in the freezer in the polar ice caps!