Zaldron Posted February 26, 2002 Spam accusations are quality spam too. And no, spam accusations accusations aren't, so don't bother :P 0 Share this post Link to post
Submerge Posted February 26, 2002 accusations of spam accusations are spam, too. So is talking about said accusations, and talking about accusations of said accusations, and so forth. 0 Share this post Link to post
pritch Posted February 26, 2002 accusations of spam accusations are spam, too. So is talking about said accusations, and talking about accusations of said accusations, and so forth. So this is spam? 0 Share this post Link to post
LordTrasher Posted February 27, 2002 (sings the spam song from Monty Python) 0 Share this post Link to post
LorD BaZTArD Posted February 27, 2002 Huh? how did you confuse my sig with BBG's? ah anyhow, yeah fearing BBG is good advice =D, and a few others. So beware ;). 0 Share this post Link to post
LorD BaZTArD Posted February 27, 2002 Huh? how did you confuse my sig with BBG's? ah anyhow, yeah fearing BBG is good advice =D, and a few others. So beware ;). 0 Share this post Link to post
deathz0r Posted February 27, 2002 fearing BBG is good adviceso he can shut his mouth for a few minutes. 0 Share this post Link to post
LordTrasher Posted February 27, 2002 I just looked quickly at the names and didn't look properly. Night all... 0 Share this post Link to post
Kid Airbag Posted February 27, 2002 Huh? how did you confuse my sig with BBG's? ah anyhow, yeah fearing BBG is good advice =D, and a few others. So beware ;).No, BBG is harmless. 0 Share this post Link to post
LorD BaZTArD Posted February 27, 2002 I know that, just messin around. 0 Share this post Link to post
zed044 Posted February 28, 2002 hey would you happen to be the same lordtrasher as the one from the Acmlm boards? ignore this if you dont what im talking about... 0 Share this post Link to post
Naked Snake Posted February 28, 2002 Huh? how did you confuse my sig with BBG's? ah anyhow, yeah fearing BBG is good advice =D, and a few others. So beware ;).No, BBG is harmless. Yeah, harmless as a nuclear missile ;) 0 Share this post Link to post
LordTrasher Posted February 28, 2002 Harmless as a fart in a lift, from what I hear. Now, while this thread's at the top, I'll just get this off my chest: People have been recreating Quake3 and CTF in Doom 2, but why not the obvious one, Team Fortress? 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted February 28, 2002 Now, while this thread's at the top, I'll just get this off my chest:You can start new topics, you know. 0 Share this post Link to post
LordTrasher Posted March 1, 2002 I know, I know. I just feel like adding a little big of controversy (and drunken shouts of "HELL YEH!") to this post... :) 0 Share this post Link to post
Sharessa Posted March 1, 2002 He seems to be fitting in quite nicely. Before long, he will be indestinguishable from the rest of the Doomworlders. :) 0 Share this post Link to post
LordTrasher Posted March 2, 2002 Like other Doomworlders? By just looking at this topic, I wouldn't call that a complement... :) 0 Share this post Link to post
deathz0r Posted March 2, 2002 well yeah, bbg and sleepy_boy do have their stints of retardness. 0 Share this post Link to post
læmænt Posted March 2, 2002 Like other Doomworlders? By just looking at this topic, I wouldn't call that a complement... :)It probably wasn't, but the only reasonable thing a sane person can do in a lunatic asylum is to become insane... 0 Share this post Link to post
pritch Posted March 2, 2002 we cannot actually define ourselves without the existence of others. We define Self by what we are not. Self is impossible without Otherness. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kid Airbag Posted March 2, 2002 we cannot actually define ourselves without the existence of others. We define Self by what we are not. Self is impossible without Otherness.Yeah...weed...n'stuff... 0 Share this post Link to post
Doom-Child Posted March 2, 2002 we cannot actually define ourselves without the existence of others. We define Self by what we are not. Self is impossible without Otherness. Anything that can be defined as a negative can also be expressed as a positive. Therefore, Self is possible without others. DC 0 Share this post Link to post
læmænt Posted March 2, 2002 Anything that can be defined as a negative can also be expressed as a positive.Why do you think so? 0 Share this post Link to post
Doom-Child Posted March 2, 2002 Let's see...the immutable laws of the universe, infinity, mathematics...no reason. DC 0 Share this post Link to post
læmænt Posted March 2, 2002 Unfortunately I don't see what "immutable laws" of anything can provide for such a statement. Say, how do you express "Not God" as a positive? Or, for that matter, "Not number one"? 0 Share this post Link to post
Lobo Posted March 2, 2002 Say, how do you express "Not God" as a positive? Answer: Not(Not God)Or, for that matter, "Not number one"? Answer: Not(Not number one) Simple boolean logic!! BTW: why are you assuming God is positive? Maybe it's already negative... And not number one doesn't have to be negative: could be 2! 0 Share this post Link to post
pritch Posted March 2, 2002 Meh, DC takes on my entire collection of professors and Doctors from University. A brave man. Can you believe people get paid to prove this stuff? I think I'll become an academic, and wear crusty checked corduoys, sounds like fun :) 0 Share this post Link to post
Doom-Child Posted March 2, 2002 No no, not DC, mathefreakingmatics. DC 0 Share this post Link to post
læmænt Posted March 2, 2002 No no, not DC, mathefreakingmatics. DCSo far it seems like you don't know crap about mathefreakingmatics, sorry to say that... Can you please answer my original question? 0 Share this post Link to post