Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Sign in to follow this  
LordTrasher

Hello all. I appear to be new.

Recommended Posts

Spam accusations are quality spam too. And no, spam accusations accusations aren't, so don't bother :P

Share this post


Link to post

accusations of spam accusations are spam, too. So is talking about said accusations, and talking about accusations of said accusations, and so forth.

Share this post


Link to post

accusations of spam accusations are spam, too. So is talking about said accusations, and talking about accusations of said accusations, and so forth.

So this is spam?

Share this post


Link to post

Huh? how did you confuse my sig with BBG's? ah anyhow, yeah fearing BBG is good advice =D, and a few others. So beware ;).

No, BBG is harmless.

Share this post


Link to post

hey would you happen to be the same lordtrasher as the one from the Acmlm boards?

ignore this if you dont what im talking about...

Share this post


Link to post

Huh? how did you confuse my sig with BBG's? ah anyhow, yeah fearing BBG is good advice =D, and a few others. So beware ;).

No, BBG is harmless.


Yeah, harmless as a nuclear missile ;)

Share this post


Link to post

Harmless as a fart in a lift, from what I hear.

Now, while this thread's at the top, I'll just get this off my chest:

People have been recreating Quake3 and CTF in Doom 2, but why not the obvious one, Team Fortress?

Share this post


Link to post

Now, while this thread's at the top, I'll just get this off my chest:

You can start new topics, you know.

Share this post


Link to post

I know, I know. I just feel like adding a little big of controversy (and drunken shouts of "HELL YEH!") to this post... :)

Share this post


Link to post

He seems to be fitting in quite nicely. Before long, he will be indestinguishable from the rest of the Doomworlders.

:)

Share this post


Link to post

Like other Doomworlders? By just looking at this topic, I wouldn't call that a complement... :)

It probably wasn't, but the only reasonable thing a sane person can do in a lunatic asylum is to become insane...

Share this post


Link to post

we cannot actually define ourselves without the existence of others.

We define Self by what we are not. Self is impossible without Otherness.

Share this post


Link to post

we cannot actually define ourselves without the existence of others.

We define Self by what we are not. Self is impossible without Otherness.

Yeah...weed...n'stuff...

Share this post


Link to post

we cannot actually define ourselves without the existence of others.

We define Self by what we are not. Self is impossible without Otherness.


Anything that can be defined as a negative can also be expressed as a positive. Therefore, Self is possible without others.

DC

Share this post


Link to post

Unfortunately I don't see what "immutable laws" of anything can provide for such a statement.

Say, how do you express "Not God" as a positive? Or, for that matter, "Not number one"?

Share this post


Link to post

Say, how do you express "Not God" as a positive?

Answer: Not(Not God)

Or, for that matter, "Not number one"?

Answer: Not(Not number one)

Simple boolean logic!!

BTW: why are you assuming God is positive? Maybe it's already negative...
And not number one doesn't have to be negative: could be 2!

Share this post


Link to post

Meh, DC takes on my entire collection of professors and Doctors from University. A brave man.

Can you believe people get paid to prove this stuff? I think I'll become an academic, and wear crusty checked corduoys, sounds like fun :)

Share this post


Link to post

No no, not DC, mathefreakingmatics.



DC

So far it seems like you don't know crap about mathefreakingmatics, sorry to say that... Can you please answer my original question?

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
×