myk Posted August 18, 2009 Visplane Overflow said: he doubts the existence of the Wikipedia Jews... There are many Jewish people editing the Wikipedia, and my reaction was to using such a generalized (arguably racist) term to refer to some who have an overdeveloped zeal about anything Israelite or Jewish coupled with the tendency to mark anything critical of those as anti-semitic. And there are people on other departments who are also pretty thick like that, but might not stand out as much because few topics are as controversial as politics related to Israel these days. 0 Share this post Link to post
Super Jamie Posted August 18, 2009 I knew replying to this topic was a bad idea. I don't care. 0 Share this post Link to post
Jonathan Posted August 18, 2009 And where are the top links from on Super Jamie's Google search link? encylopediadramatica.com thewhiterealist.net www.trollkingdom.net analogkid12.wordpress.com www.stormfront.org robertlindsay.wordpress.com wwewrestling2008.blogspot.com Well, I'm convinced! No wait, I meant to say you're a credulous moron. 0 Share this post Link to post
Creaphis Posted August 19, 2009 I'm glad that Myk is contributing to Wikipedia and Ducon isn't. 0 Share this post Link to post
ducon Posted August 19, 2009 myk, English is not my native language, that’s why my posts are so short and maybe cryptic. If it was in French, I might be longer and say exactly what I want to say. When I was a sysop in the French wikipedia, I was appreciated, but I left because in fact I didn’t agree with the policy. I did not flame nor vandalized, I just explained my views, tried to debate, tried to modify the policy (of course, not alone like a vandal) and saw that I had nothing to do here. 0 Share this post Link to post
Sharessa Posted August 19, 2009 Visplane Overflow said:Furthermore : IMG The response to the man saying his child died in his arms should have been. "That's original research, so that doesn't count!" 0 Share this post Link to post