dew, I wasn't saying the war would serve to distract the entire world from Occupy Wall Street protests, but rather the American world, if you know what I mean, ofcourse I'm quite sure that quite a big percentage of the world doesn't really give a shit about it, if anything starting this war would probably bring more international attention toward America's economy. It would serve to distract Americans who's world does revolve around America, and ofcourse America has a huge impact on any country that has an oil reserve in the middle east.
Sure, ahmadinejad might be a twat, but so are most politicians, including and not limited to Netanyahu, Mcain, and Jacob Zuma but using a politician's personality to smear and generalize a whole nation is bullshit propaganda at it's finest, and is what I'm talking about.
The report is too vague to be of any real, definitive and clear evidence, also add to this it contains no new information, and claiming a country to have a nuclear bomb when the report contains no definitive information of a nuclear bomb is also a bold statement. The only thing it uncovered was a few explosives tests, which is worthless because every country has done explosives tests, and some of it's evidence has been recycled such as using computer data that dated back to the last inspection. Nothing points towards the making of an actual nuclear bomb. You know what other report was vague? The report they did in Iraq and it turned out there was no nuke there either. If there were actual nukes they would have been found because Iran invited inspectors and some organizations even offered a huge reward for anyone that can come up with information that can lead towards the finding of real evidence of a nuke, because nukes can't be hidden without atleast 400 people knowing about them, and with zionist spies infiltrating Iran and America hacking their computer systems and engaging in internet terrorism I'm pretty sure someone would have actually come up with information if there was actually any. And while we're talking about nukes, what about the double standards? When was the last time Israel allowed IAEA to do an inspection there? And who was the only country to ever use nukes, not only against an army, but against a civilian city as well? America, and no, IAEA might not work for Israel interests but to rule out that the report wasn't open to biased interpretation is nonsense. Since Iran has been accused of having nukes for about 15 years now, surely there would be more damning and concrete evidence other than ahmadinejad's personality alongside a bullshit assassination "attempt", a few explosives tests and some out of date recycled data that was the same data used in the last report and has been untouched since? And still keep in mind that the last time a country was cut down for being a "nuclear threat", the punchline was that there was no nuke. And also keep in mind that Iran is not a threat to USA, they'd get wiped off the face of the earth if they tried to engage Nuclear Warfare anyway.
But hey, sorry I might have turned this into an unnecessarily long essay again and I have an 2 exams coming up in a row next week so I'll need to work until the 19th of November on trying to pass those and I'll give you another reply then if you choose to respond. :)
Anyway, it seems inbred Fox news and Mcain are already screaming for Blood and are criticizing Obama for not jumping blindly into war with Iran by now. I hope this doesn't lead to war.
Last edited by DeathevokatioN on Nov 11 2011 at 02:20