Who`s the third Anti-Christ?

I was wondering, who you Doomers think is the new Anti-Christ.
Following the prophecy of Nostradamus, the first AC was Napoleon; the second was Adolf Hitler and the third would among us right now.
It wouldn`t be long untill he`ll show his true face...

PS
Don`t try and be funny saying you are new AC, because the real Anti-Christ would hide his true identity!

Share this post


Link to post

I forgot my greek, if you put world and power together you get the equivalent of 666. The World power when that thing about the beast was written was the Roman Empire. Don't get fooled by Nostredamus, like anyone else, no one can forsee the future. The same book (revelation) also strongly suggested to use your higher intellect when searging for the meaning of the number!

Share this post


Link to post

The Canarias Isles. No I'm not kidding. Ever heard of mega-tsunamis?

Share this post


Link to post

I'm suprised no one was a dumbass and reply with "Marilyn Manson."

Nostradamus prophesied that the last (and most devestating) Anti-Christ would come from one of the Arab nations. No kidding.


Bin Laden? nah......

Share this post


Link to post

I've got a pretty good idea where Nostradamus can shove his prophecies. I believe that inividuals and mankind are free to chart their own course, free from any sort of pre-determined destiny. I also believe that "prophecies" can be twisted and massaged to fit any sort of situation.

Share this post


Link to post

We may expect the following:

His age may be 30 to 50, when he comes forth-ref Lk 3:23
He is the son of Satan-ref Gen 3:15
He uses his own name-ref Jn 5:43
The number of his name is 666-ref Rev 13:17,18
He may be a member of the EEC at this time-ref Dan 9:26
He could hold a position of importance in the EEC-COV
He may be good-looking-ref Ezek 28:12
He may be very charismatic and dynamic-COV
He may be a diplomat of some type or diplomatic-COV
He should be single-ref Dan 11:37-COV (Jesus was single; it would
be very difficult for the Jews to receive a married person as
being God and their Messiah)
He may be an Assyrian-ref Mic 5:6; Isa 30:31
He should be a Jew-ref Dan 11:37 (it would seem he would have to be
a Jew to be accepted by the Jews as their Messiah)
He could come from the tribe of Dan-ref Gen 49:17; Rev 7
He comes forth out of the revived Roman Empire-ref Dan 9:26
He will be extremely intelligent-ref Ezek 28:12
He will be very proud and confident-ref Dan 8:25; 11:37
He will be bold-COV
His look will be very stout or intimidating-ref Dan 7:20
He will have the characteristics of his father, Satan-ref Gen 3:15;
COV
He will be very evil, a liar, deceitful, cunning, and persuasive-COV
He will be able to lie and deceive the masses-ref Rev 13:8-COV
People will eventually be positive that he is wonderful and truthful- COV
People will eventually be positive that he is the Christ-ref Rev 13
People will eventually be positive that he is God-ref 2 Thes 2:4;
Rev 13

I agree with Fodder; Sharon is doing evil, but I don`t think he is the AC. He`s just to old. Maybe Satan put him on Earth to make a foundation for the real AC, who is still to reveal himself. The AC will pretend to act in the name of God, but will deny Jesus, as will his followers. It makes sense the AC would claim to be Jewish, and Satan is preparing his arrival by psyching up the Jews in Isreal with the help of Sharon.

Then again it`s just a theory, not to be taken to seriously!

Share this post


Link to post
m0l0t0v said:

We may expect the following:
Then again it`s just a theory, not to be taken to seriously!

good, you got me worried there for a moment!

Share this post


Link to post

I think its iether Sharon, Bush, or the op who just quieted me in #zdoom for no reason. Fucker.

m0l0t0v said:

The number of his name is 666-ref Rev 13:17,18

Hmm, actualy my Bible says:
(REV 13:16)Also, it (the beast) causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom: let him who is understanding rekon the number of the beast, for it is a human number, its number is six hundred and sixty-six*.

*Other anchient authorities read six hundred and sixteen


Hmm...very interesting.

Anyway, I don't believe any of this is true since I'm not religious or anything. But it is kinda fun.

Share this post


Link to post

i thought i read somewhere that bill gates' full name adds to 666 or something...i'll have to look into that (fade out with an ominous elipsis)

...

Share this post


Link to post

Well, umm, if you say he should be around us at this time I'm thinking it's Bin Laden.

Share this post


Link to post

Barney the dinosaur is the anti-christ... I saw this thing once where if you take CUTE PURPLE DINOSAUR and change the appropriate letters to Roman numerals, they will add together to 666

Share this post


Link to post
Rellik said:

I'm pretty sure it's Marilyn Manson.

And that's exactly what he wants you to believe.

Share this post


Link to post

Heh...so many anti-christs, so little time.

If anyone is the true anti-christ, its probably me.

Share this post


Link to post
m0l0t0v said:

PS

Don`t try and be funny saying you are new AC, because the real Anti-Christ would hide his true identity!

Ok, then i'm NOT the new Antichrist :P

Share this post


Link to post
m0l0t0v said:

----> BARNEY (6) PURPLE (6) LIZARD (6)

It seems we all have our own Anti Christs...

Burney was a dinosaur not a lizurd!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
orion said:

Burney was a dinosaur not a lizurd!!!!!

Dinosaur... from Greek deinos terrifying + sauros lizard . LIZARD LIZARD LIZARD

Share this post


Link to post

that's language, has nothing to do with the scientific fact:
lizards != dinosaours.

Share this post


Link to post
orion said:

that's language, has nothing to do with the scientific fact:
lizards != dinosaours.


Dinosaurs are lizards you ass!

Share this post


Link to post

Dinosaurs were named that because people THOUGHT that they were huge, terrifying lizards, however, it is now believed that the dinosaurs were not lizards - they were in fact huge, primitive birds.
Latest resarch results state that dinosaurs wore feathers and their skeletons have a lot in common with the modern bird.

In other words: The name doesn't matter shit - officially, dinosaurs were birds, not lizards.

Share this post


Link to post

You people can't expect that a single human fucks up the whole World. Nature is by far a most dangerous menace.

Share this post


Link to post

huge birds? that's the first time i've heard that...I wish elephant birds were still alive: They stood 11 feet tall and were stocky like cassowaries. I'd ride one around and get it to dig it's beak thru peoples' skulls :)

Share this post


Link to post
BBG said:

Dinosaurs are lizards you ass!

dsm said:

Dinosaurs were named that because people THOUGHT that they were huge, terrifying lizards, however, it is now believed that the dinosaurs were not lizards - they were in fact huge, primitive birds.
Latest resarch results state that dinosaurs wore feathers and their skeletons have a lot in common with the modern bird.

In other words: The name doesn't matter shit - officially, dinosaurs were birds, not lizards.

If I'm the ass you can eat my shit. =P

Share this post


Link to post

Dinosaurs were either all hot-blooded or all cold-blooded.

Mesozoic dinosaurs were not "warm-blooded" like modern mammals, nor were they "cold-blooded" like modern lizards. Most specialists believe that dinosaurs were "dinosaur-blooded", a condition that combines certain aspects of "warm-bloodedness" with a changing metabolism over the animal's lifetime.


The word dinosaur means "terrible-lizard."

Actually it was originally defined to mean "fearfully-great lizard", by Richard Owen in 1842. The greek word "deinos", when used as a superlative, means "fearfully-great" (as used by Homer in THE ILIAD). It became simplified over time, as a simple adjective, to mean "terrible". Dinosaurs are neither terrible nor are they lizards!

Share this post


Link to post

fod, other than looking smart your post says nothing new, or nothing that makes any difference in the fact dinosaurs aren't lizards. =P

Share this post


Link to post
dsm said:

Dinosaurs were named that because people THOUGHT that they were huge, terrifying lizards, however, it is now believed that the dinosaurs were not lizards - they were in fact huge, primitive birds.
Latest resarch results state that dinosaurs wore feathers and their skeletons have a lot in common with the modern bird.

In other words: The name doesn't matter shit - officially, dinosaurs were birds, not lizards.

Well I don't want to complicate the confusion any futher but I think I will. Finally I can brag about my knowledge of Biology. Here it comes... prepare yourself...
Read the following article:

A Molecular Phylogeny of Reptiles S. Blair Hedges, Laura L. Poling
It comes from Science magazine vol 283 12 Feb 1999
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/283/5404/998?

It states that birds are reptiles.

It is quite possible you won't get in this site. Sciencemag has a thing against just anyone getting in. However if you can't get in and want to see the article just tell me and I'll mail it to you. (this off course is illegal, but what the hey!)

Share this post


Link to post

Ah... its simple: the first cloned human will be a third AC... It will non God's creature...

The true is that Britney Spears is a Babylonian Whore; Mr. Bean is a Dragon; and real AC is president of Ghana!!!

Share this post


Link to post
This topic is now closed to further replies.